ai4scientist/nano-scientist/dse-loop

Claude Code and agent skill by ai4scientist/nano-scientist

Trust tier 2
  • community
LLM review pending
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Autonomous design space exploration loop for computer architecture and EDA. Runs a program, analyzes results, tunes parameters, and iterates until objective is met or timeout. Use when user says \"DSE\", \"design space exploration\", \"sweep parameters\", \"optimize\", \"find best config\", or wants iterative parameter tuning.

Install

npx vskill@latest install ai4scientist/nano-scientist/dse-loop

SKILL.md

DSE Loop: Autonomous Design Space Exploration

Autonomously explore a design space: run → analyze → pick next parameters → repeat, until the objective is met or timeout is reached. Designed for computer architecture and EDA problems.

Context: $ARGUMENTS

Safety Rules — READ FIRST

NEVER do any of the following:

  • sudo anything
  • rm -rf, rm -r, or any recursive deletion
  • rm any file you did not create in this session
  • Overwrite existing source files without reading them first
  • git push, git reset --hard, or any destructive git operation
  • Kill processes you did not start

If a step requires any of the above, STOP and report to the user.

Constants (override via $ARGUMENTS)

ConstantDefaultDescription
TIMEOUT2hTotal wall-clock budget. Stop exploring after this.
MAX_ITERATIONS50Hard cap on number of design points evaluated.
PATIENCE10Stop early if no improvement for this many consecutive iterations.
OBJECTIVEminimizeminimize or maximize the target metric.

Override inline: /dse-loop "task desc — timeout: 4h, max_iterations: 100, patience: 15"

Typical Use Cases

ProblemProgramParametersObjective
Microarch DSEgem5 simulationcache size, assoc, pipeline width, ROB size, branch predictormaximize IPC or minimize area×delay
Synthesis tuningyosys/DC scriptoptimization passes, target freq, effort levelminimize area at timing closure
RTL parameterizationverilator simdata width, FIFO depth, pipeline stages, buffer sizesmeet throughput target at min area
Compiler flagsgcc/llvm build + benchmark-O levels, unroll factor, vectorization, schedulingminimize runtime or code size
Placement/routingopenroad/innovusutilization, aspect ratio, layer configminimize wirelength / timing
Formal verificationabc/sbybound depth, engine, timeout per propertymaximize coverage in time budget
Memory subsystemcacti / ramulatorbank count, row buffer policy, schedulingoptimize bandwidth/energy

Workflow

Phase 0: Parse Task & Setup
  1. Parse $ARGUMENTS to extract:
  • Program: what to run (command, script, or Makefile target)
  • Parameter space: which knobs to tune and their ranges/options (may be incomplete — see step 2)
  • Objective metric: what to optimize (and how to extract it from output)
  • Constraints: hard limits that must not be violated (e.g., timing must close)
  • Timeout: wall-clock budget
  • Success criteria: when is the result "good enough" to stop early?
  1. Infer missing parameter ranges — If the user provides parameter names but NOT ranges/options, you MUST infer them before exploring:

a. Read the source code — search for the parameter names in the codebase:

  • Look for argparse/click definitions, config files, Makefile variables, module parameters, #define, parameter (SystemVerilog), localparam, etc.
  • Extract defaults, types, and any comments hinting at valid values

b. Apply domain knowledge to set reasonable ranges:

Parameter typeInference strategy
Cache/memory sizesPowers of 2, typically 1KB–16MB
AssociativityPowers of 2: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16
Pipeline width / issue widthSmall integers: 1, 2, 4, 8
Buffer/queue/FIFO depthPowers of 2: 4, 8, 16, 32, 64
Clock period / frequencyBased on technology node; try ±50% from default
Bound depth (BMC/formal)Geometric: 5, 10, 20, 50, 100
Timeout valuesGeometric: 10s, 30s, 60s, 120s, 300s
Boolean/enum flagsEnumerate all options found in source
Continuous (learning rate, threshold)Log-scale sweep: 5 points spanning 2 orders of magnitude around default
Integer counts (threads, cores)Linear: from 1 to hardware max

c. Start conservative — begin with 3-5 values per parameter. Expand range later if the best result is at a boundary.

d. Log inferred ranges — write the inferred parameter space to dse_results/inferred_params.md so the user can review: ```markdown # Inferred Parameter Space

ParameterSourceDefaultInferred RangeReasoning
CACHE_SIZEconfig.py:4232768[8192, 16384, 32768, 65536, 131072]powers of 2, ±2x from default
ASSOCconfig.py:434[1, 2, 4, 8]standard associativities
BMC_DEPTHrun_bmc.py:1510[5, 10, 20, 50]geometric, common BMC depths

```

e. Boundary expansion — during the search, if the best result is at the min or max of a range, automatically extend that range by one step in that direction (but log the extension).

  1. Read the project to understand:
  • How to run the program
  • Where results are produced (stdout, log files, reports)
  • How to parse the objective metric from output
  • Current/baseline configuration (if any)
  1. Create working directory: dse_results/ in project root
  • dse_results/dse_log.csv — one row per design point
  • dse_results/DSE_REPORT.md — final report
  • dse_results/DSE_STATE.json — state for recovery
  • dse_results/inferred_params.md — inferred parameter space (if ranges were not provided)
  • dse_results/configs/ — config files for each run
  • dse_results/outputs/ — raw output for each run
  1. Write a parameter extraction script (dse_results/parse_result.py or similar) that takes a run's output and returns the objective metric as a number. Test it on a baseline run first.
  1. Run baseline (iteration 0): run the program with default/current parameters. Record the baseline metric. This is the point to beat.
Phase 1: Initial Exploration

Goal: Quickly survey the space to understand which parameters matter most.

Strategy: Latin Hypercube Sampling or structured sweep of key parameters.

  1. Pick 5-10 diverse design points that span the parameter ranges
  2. Run them (in parallel if independent, via background processes or sequential)
  3. Record all results in dse_log.csv:

`` iteration,param1,param2,...,metric,constraint_met,timestamp,notes 0,default,default,...,baseline_val,yes,2026-03-13T10:00:00,baseline 1,val1a,val2a,...,result1,yes,2026-03-13T10:05:00,initial sweep ... ``

  1. Analyze: which parameters have the most impact on the objective?
  2. Narrow the search to the most sensitive parameters
Phase 2: Directed Search

Goal: Converge toward the optimum by making informed choices.

Strategy: Adaptive — pick the approach that fits the problem:

  • Few parameters (≤3): Fine-grained grid search around the best region from Phase 1
  • Many parameters (>3): Coordinate descent — optimize one parameter at a time, holding others at current best
  • Binary/categorical params: Enumerate promising combinations
  • Continuous params: Binary search or golden section between best neighbors
  • Multi-objective: Track Pareto frontier, explore along the front

For each iteration:

  1. Select next design point based on results so far:
  • Look at the trend: which direction improves the metric?
  • Avoid re-running configurations already evaluated
  • Balance exploration (untested regions) vs exploitation (near current best)
  1. Modify parameters: edit config file, command-line args, or source constants
  1. Run the program: execute and capture output
  1. Parse results: extract the objective metric and check constraints
  1. Log to `dse_log.csv`: append the new row
  1. Check stopping conditions:
  • Timeout reached? → stop
  • Max iterations reached? → stop
  • Patience exhausted (no improvement in N iterations)? → stop
  • Success criteria met (metric is "good enough")? → stop
  • Constraint violation pattern detected? → adjust search bounds
  1. Update `DSE_STATE.json`:

``json { "iteration": 15, "status": "in_progress", "best_metric": 1.23, "best_params": {"cache_size": 32768, "assoc": 4, "pipeline_width": 2}, "total_iterations": 15, "start_time": "2026-03-13T10:00:00", "timeout": "2h", "patience_counter": 3 } ``

  1. Decide next step → back to step 1
Phase 3: Refinement (if time allows)

If the search converged and there's still time budget:

  1. Local perturbation: try ±1 step on each parameter from the best point
  2. Sensitivity analysis: which parameters can be relaxed without hurting the metric?
  3. Constraint boundary: if a constraint is nearly binding, explore near-feasible points
Phase 4: Report

Write dse_results/DSE_REPORT.md:

markdown
# Design Space Exploration Report
**Task**: [description]
**Date**: [start] → [end]
**Total iterations**: N
**Wall-clock time**: X hours Y minutes
## Objective
-**Metric**: [what was optimized]
-**Direction**: minimize / maximize
-**Baseline**: [value]
-**Best found**: [value] ([improvement]% better than baseline)
## Best Configuration
| Parameter | Baseline | Best |
|-----------|----------|------|
| param1 | default | best_val |
| param2 | default | best_val |
| ... | ... | ... |
## Search Trajectory
| Iteration | param1 | param2 | ... | Metric | Notes |
|-----------|--------|--------|-----|--------|-------|
| 0 (baseline) | ... | ... | ... | ... | baseline |
| 1 | ... | ... | ... | ... | initial sweep |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| N (best) | ... | ... | ... | ... | ★ best |
## Parameter Sensitivity
-**param1**: [high/medium/low impact] — [brief explanation]
-**param2**: [high/medium/low impact] — [brief explanation]
## Pareto Frontier (if multi-objective)
[Table or description of non-dominated points]
## Stopping Reason
[timeout / max_iterations / patience / success_criteria_met]
## Recommendations
-[actionable insights from the exploration]
-[which parameters matter most]
-[suggested follow-up explorations]

Also generate a summary plot if matplotlib is available:

  • Convergence curve (metric vs iteration)
  • Parameter sensitivity bar chart
  • Pareto frontier scatter (if multi-objective)

State Recovery

If the context window compacts mid-run, the loop recovers from DSE_STATE.json + dse_log.csv:

  1. Read DSE_STATE.json for current iteration, best params, patience counter
  2. Read dse_log.csv for full history
  3. Resume from next iteration

Key Rules

  • Work AUTONOMOUSLY — do not ask the user for permission at each iteration
  • Every run must be logged — even failed runs, constraint violations, errors. The log is the ground truth.
  • Never re-run an identical configuration — check dse_log.csv before each run
  • Respect the timeout — check elapsed time before starting a new iteration. If the next run is likely to exceed the timeout, stop and report.
  • Parse metrics programmatically — write a parsing script, don't eyeball logs
  • Keep raw outputs — save each run's full output in dse_results/outputs/iter_N/
  • Constraint violations are not improvements — a design point that violates constraints is never "best", regardless of the metric
  • If a run crashes, log the error, skip that point, and continue with the next
  • If the same crash repeats 3 times with different configs, stop and report the issue

Example Invocations

# Minimal — just name the parameters, let the agent figure out ranges
/dse-loop "Run gem5 mcf benchmark. Tune: L1D_SIZE, L2_SIZE, ROB_ENTRIES. Objective: maximize IPC. Timeout: 3h"
# Partial — some ranges given, some not
/dse-loop "Run make synth. Tune: CLOCK_PERIOD [5ns, 4ns, 3ns, 2ns], FLATTEN, ABC_SCRIPT. Objective: minimize area at timing closure. Timeout: 1h"

This is the start of the file. Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
100
Repository forks
16
7-day trend score
23

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/ai4scientist/nano-scientist/dse-loop/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/ai4scientist/nano-scientist/dse-loop)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.