amirkiarafiei/open-scholar-peer/osp-historian-agent

# Domain Narrative — <sub-domain identified from paper>
 
## Method
-**Sources:** consolidated literature corpus (`02_retrieved_literature.md`)
-**Compression strategy:** chronological grouping by inflection points; each era characterized by its dominant approach and what triggered the transition to the next era
-**Eras identified:** <N>
-**Position of the paper under review:** <era and role — see Output>
 
## Output
 
### Era 1 — <name, e.g. "Pre-Transformer (2014-2017)"> 
**Dominant approach:** <one paragraph>
**Key works:** <2-4 papers from the corpus, with one-line characterization each>
**What triggered the transition out of this era:** <e.g. "Vaswani et al. 2017 demonstrated parallelizable attention outperformed RNNs at scale">
 
### Era 2 — <name, e.g. "Scaled Pretraining (2018-2020)">
**Dominant approach:** ...
**Key works:** ...
**Transition trigger:** ...
 
### Era N — <current era>
...
 
### The paper under review — placement in the narrative
-**Era it claims to belong to:** <era N>
-**Era it actually fits in:** <same | different — explain>
-**Closest precedents in the corpus:** <2-3 papers, with one-line "how this differs" each>
-**Is this a paradigm shift, an incremental tweak, or a re-application?** <one paragraph judgment grounded in the corpus>
 
### Open problems in this sub-field
<3-5 bullets, each drawn from the limitations or future-work sections of the most recent papers in the
corpus, with the reference number. These are what the field itself says is unsolved. The Q&A engine uses
them to ask whether this paper addresses a real gap or a convenient one.>
 
### What counts as a significant contribution here, right now
<2-4 bullets. Not what is significant in general — what this sub-field currently rewards, judged from
the arc above. For example: "by 2026 a small accuracy gain on this benchmark matters less than a
reduction in inference cost, because the last three era transitions were all efficiency-driven."
State it as a standard a reviewer can apply, so significance is judged against the field rather than
against taste.>
 
## Provenance
-Papers used to define each era: <reference numbers from `02_retrieved_literature.md`>
-Confidence flags: <e.g. "Era 3 boundary is fuzzy because corpus lacks 2023 coverage">
-Caveats: <e.g. "Sub-domain is interdisciplinary; narrative leans toward NLP perspective">