aplaceforallmystuff/minervia-starter-kit/lessons-learned

Claude Code and agent skill by aplaceforallmystuff/minervia-starter-kit

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Structured retrospective for incidents and mistakes. Transforms problems into systematic improvements.

Install

npx vskill@latest install aplaceforallmystuff/minervia-starter-kit/lessons-learned

SKILL.md

Lessons Learned

Transform problems into systematic improvements through structured retrospective analysis.

Why This Matters

Mistakes repeat when we only fix symptoms. With structured retrospectives:

  • Root causes get addressed, not just symptoms
  • Fixes are encoded into the system (skills, guards, docs)
  • Each problem makes the system stronger
  • You never hear "we should have thought about that first"

Quick Start

  1. Define the incident factually
  2. Build a timeline
  3. Find root cause with 5 Whys
  4. Identify contributing factors
  5. Implement fixes (don't just recommend them)
  6. Define verification criteria

Process

Phase 1: Incident Definition

Capture facts first, analysis later.

markdown
## Incident Summary
**What happened:** [Factual description]
**When:** [Date/time]
**Impact:** [What was affected]
**Resolution:** [How it was fixed]
**Time to resolution:** [How long to fix]
Phase 2: Timeline Reconstruction
TimeActionActorOutcome
HH:MM[What was done][Who][Result]

Key questions:

  • What was the trigger?
  • Where did things diverge from expected?
  • What was the point of no return?
Phase 3: Root Cause Analysis (5 Whys)
  1. Why did [incident] happen?

→ Because [immediate cause]

  1. Why did [immediate cause] happen?

→ Because [deeper cause]

  1. Why did [deeper cause] happen?

→ Because [systemic issue]

  1. Why did [systemic issue] exist?

→ Because [process gap]

  1. Why did [process gap] exist?

→ Because [root cause]

Root Cause: [The fundamental issue to address]

Phase 4: Contributing Factors
CategoryFactorContribution
ProcessMissing checkpoint[How it contributed]
CommunicationUnclear instructions[How it contributed]
TechnicalNo validation[How it contributed]
ContextPrior assumptions[How it contributed]
Phase 5: Fix Classification
Fix TypeWhen to UseHow to Encode
SkillRecurring workflow needs structureCreate new skill
GuardAction requires checkpointAdd approval gate
DocumentationKnowledge gapUpdate CLAUDE.md
AutomationManual step forgottenCreate script/hook
ChecklistMultiple steps need verificationAdd to skill
Phase 6: Fix Implementation

Don't just recommend fixes—implement them.

FixTypeLocationStatus
[Description]Skill[Path]Created
[Description]Doc[Path]Updated
Phase 7: Verification
markdown
**Test scenario:** [How to test the fix]
**Success criteria:** [What "fixed" looks like]
**Review date:** [When to check if working]

Output Template

markdown
# Lessons Learned: [Incident Title]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Severity:** Low | Medium | High | Critical
**Status:** Resolved | Monitoring | Open
## Incident Summary
[Brief description]
## Timeline
| Time | Action | Outcome |
## Root Cause
[The fundamental issue]
## Contributing Factors
-Factor 1
-Factor 2
## Fixes Implemented
| Fix | Type | Location | Status |
## Prevention
[How this prevents recurrence]
## Lessons
1.Key takeaway 1
2.Key takeaway 2

Common Patterns

Premature Action

Symptom: Action taken before approval Fix: Add explicit approval gate

Sequence Error

Symptom: Steps in wrong order Fix: Encode sequence with numbered steps

Missing Validation

Symptom: Bad data passed through Fix: Add validation checkpoint

Context Carryover

Symptom: Assumptions from prior session caused issue Fix: Add explicit context verification

Scope Creep

Symptom: Did more than requested Fix: Ask clarifying questions before expanding

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternProblemInstead
Blame assignmentMisses systemic issuesFocus on process
Single-cause thinkingOversimplifiesUse 5 Whys
Recommendation without actionLessons forgottenImplement during retrospective
Vague fixes"Be more careful" doesn't workEncode specific changes

Success Criteria

  • [ ] Incident clearly defined with timeline
  • [ ] Root cause identified (not just symptoms)
  • [ ] Contributing factors documented
  • [ ] At least one fix implemented (not just recommended)
  • [ ] Fix encoded in appropriate location
  • [ ] Verification criteria defined

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

7-day trend score
0

Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/aplaceforallmystuff/minervia-starter-kit/lessons-learned/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/aplaceforallmystuff/minervia-starter-kit/lessons-learned)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.