version: "1.0.1" name: prototype-regen description: "Archive a completed first-pass implementation as a throwaway prototype, mine it for discovered requirements and architectural learnings, then regenerate all canonical bootstrap artifacts from scratch informed by prototype insights. Use when running /sddp-regen after all epics have been implemented."

Prototype Retrospective Analyst — Regeneration Workflow

<rules>

• Project-bootstrap scope. This is a one-shot regeneration workflow, not a feature-delivery phase.
• Primary outputs: archived prototype/ directory, specs/prototype-retrospective.md, specs/prototype-epic-intelligence.md, and regenerated specs/prd.md, specs/sad.md, specs/dod.md, specs/project-plan.md.
• Must work with or without .github/sddp-config.md.
• Read local context first: all canonical bootstrap documents, all feature workspaces, implemented source code.
• prototype/ already exists → HALT: "A prototype archive already exists. This is a one-shot operation."
• Everything is archived — not a single line of implementation code remains at root after archival.
• V2 starts from blank src/ and specs/00001-* numbering.
• README.md is regenerated, not preserved.
• project-instructions.md stays at root and is never archived.
• .github/ (skills, agents, workflows) stays at root and is never archived.
• .gitignore and other git/editor config files stay at root.
• prototype/ is read-only after archival — never modify archived files.
• Each regenerated canonical document must reference prototype learnings and explain what changed.
• Preserve valid CAP-###, ADR-NNNN, and DDR-### identifiers where the underlying decisions still hold; assign new IDs for genuinely new items.
• Interactive mode: present retrospective findings for user review before regenerating. Autopilot mode (AUTOPILOT = true): accept recommended defaults, log decisions.
• Delegate all external research to Technical Researcher (.github/agents/_technical-researcher.md).
• Do not run feature-delivery phases.

</rules>

<workflow>

0. Shared Patterns

Read for reusable patterns only:

• .github/skills/init-project/SKILL.md — shared config creation and preservation
• .github/skills/artifact-conventions/SKILL.md — artifact structure and ID conventions

1. Gate Check

1.1 Prototype Guard

• prototype/ directory exists → HALT: "A prototype archive already exists at prototype/. This is a one-shot operation. Use git to manage previous archives if you need to run again."

1.2 Resolve Canonical Documents

Read .github/sddp-config.md if it exists.

For each document: (1) parse **Path**: from config, (2) fall back to default path, (3) halt or skip.

Product Document

• Config: ## Product Document → **Path**: → set PRODUCT_DOC
• Fallback: specs/prd.md
• Unresolved → HALT: "No Product Document found. Run /sddp-prd first."

Technical Context Document

• Config: ## Technical Context Document → **Path**: → set TECH_CONTEXT_DOC
• Fallback: specs/sad.md
• Unresolved → HALT: "No Technical Context Document found. Run /sddp-systemdesign first."

Deployment & Operations Document

• Config: ## Deployment & Operations Document → **Path**: → set DEPLOY_OPS_DOC
• Fallback: specs/dod.md
• Unresolved → HAS_DOD = false, continue.

Project Plan

• Config: ## Project Plan → **Path**: → set PROJECT_PLAN_DOC
• Fallback: specs/project-plan.md
• Unresolved → HALT: "No Project Plan found. Run /sddp-projectplan first."

1.3 Completion Gate

Read PROJECT_PLAN_DOC. Count [X] and [ ] epics.

• All epics [X] → proceed.
• At least one [X] and some [ ] → ask user: "Not all epics are complete ([completed]/[total]). Archive the prototype anyway?" Interactive: wait for confirmation. AUTOPILOT = true: HALT — "Not all epics complete. Complete remaining epics or explicitly confirm partial archival."
• Zero [X] epics → HALT in Autopilot. In interactive mode, warn the user: "No completed epics found in the project plan. Do you still want to archive the current repository as a prototype and regenerate canonical documents?" and proceed if confirmed.

1.4 Resolve Source Root

Read project-instructions.md → ## Source Code Layout → extract source root convention.

• ENFORCE_SRC_ROOT or mentions /src → SOURCE_ROOT = src
• Otherwise → scan for common source directories (src/, app/, lib/) → set SOURCE_ROOT
• No source directory found → HALT: "Cannot determine source code location. Specify the source root."

1.5 Identify Feature Workspaces

Scan specs/ for feature workspace directories matching #####-* pattern (e.g., 00001-feature-name). Store as FEATURE_WORKSPACES list.

Report: "Gate check passed. [N] completed epics, [M] feature workspaces, source root at [SOURCE_ROOT]/."

2. Archive the Prototype

2.1 Create Archive Directory

Create prototype/ at the project root.

2.2 Move Artifacts into prototype/

Move the following into prototype/:

Canonical bootstrap documents:

• specs/prd.md (or PRODUCT_DOC if different)
• specs/sad.md (or TECH_CONTEXT_DOC if different)
• specs/dod.md (or DEPLOY_OPS_DOC if different and HAS_DOD = true)
• specs/project-plan.md (or PROJECT_PLAN_DOC if different)
• specs/adrs/ (entire directory)
• specs/plan/ (entire directory — epic detail files)

Feature workspaces:

• All specs/#####-*/ directories (feature specs, plans, tasks, QC reports, autopilot logs)

Implementation artifacts:

• SOURCE_ROOT/ (entire source directory)
• Build manifests at root: package.json, package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock, go.mod, go.sum, pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, Gemfile, Gemfile.lock, composer.json, composer.lock, *.csproj, *.sln, pom.xml, build.gradle, build.gradle.kts — only when present
• Configuration files: tsconfig.json, tsconfig.*.json, jest.config.*, vitest.config.*, .eslintrc*, eslint.config.*, biome.json, .prettierrc*, Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml, docker-compose.yaml, .env.example — only when present
• IaC files: terraform/, infrastructure/, cdk/, pulumi/ — only when present
• Test directories: tests/, test/, __tests__/, e2e/, cypress/, playwright/ — only when present at root level
• README.md — will be regenerated

Do NOT move:

• project-instructions.md
• .github/ (skills, agents, workflows, sddp-config.md)
• .agents/
• .git/
• .gitignore, .gitattributes
• Editor/IDE config: .vscode/, .idea/, .editorconfig
• prototype/ itself
• node_modules/, vendor/, target/, dist/, build/, .build/ (build outputs — exclude from archive)
• Local environment files containing configurations or secrets at root: .env, .env.local, .env.development, .env.test, .env.production, .env.staging, .env.local.db (to prevent accidental credential leaks in Git)

2.3 Create Prototype Manifest

Create prototype/PROTOTYPE.md:

# Prototype Archive
 
> This directory contains the first-pass implementation archived by `/sddp-regen`.
> All contents are read-only reference material for the V2 regeneration.
 
-**Archived**: [ISO date]
-**Git SHA**: [current HEAD SHA]
-**Completed Epics**: [count]/[total]
-**Feature Workspaces**: [list of workspace directory names]
-**Source Root**: [SOURCE_ROOT]
 
## Epic Summary
 
| Epic | Status | Feature Workspace |
|------|--------|-------------------|
| E001 | ✓ | 00001-feature-name |
| ... | ... | ... |
 
## Archive Contents
 
[tree listing of prototype/ contents, 2 levels deep]

2.4 Create Empty Source Root

Create an empty SOURCE_ROOT/ directory with a .gitkeep file.

2.5 Create Empty Specs Directory

Recreate specs/ at root (it was moved into prototype/). Create specs/adrs/ and specs/plan/ and ensure they are empty.

2.6 Update Configuration

Read .github/sddp-config.md and clear all document paths:

• ## Product Document → **Path**: → set to empty
• ## Technical Context Document → **Path**: → set to empty
• ## Deployment & Operations Document → **Path**: → set to empty (if section exists)
• ## Project Plan → **Path**: → set to empty (if section exists)

Preserve all other config sections (## Checklist Settings, ## Autopilot, ## Derived QC Policy, etc.) unchanged.

Report: "Prototype archived to prototype/. Config paths cleared. Ready to mine insights."

3. Mine the Prototype for Insights

Systematically extract lessons from each artifact category. Build a structured findings record.

3.1 From Canonical Bootstrap Documents

Read prototype/specs/prd.md:

• Extract ## Product Capability Map — all CAP-### entries with priorities
• Extract scope boundaries, success metrics, assumptions, open questions
• Note any ## Project Context Baseline Updates entries

Read prototype/specs/sad.md:

• Extract architecture style, tech stack, quality attributes
• Read standalone ADRs from prototype/specs/adrs/ — extract ADR-NNNN, status, context, rationale
• Extract C4 diagrams, integration patterns, cross-cutting concerns

Read prototype/specs/dod.md (if present):

• Extract DDR-### decisions, environment strategy, CI/CD design, observability targets, reliability targets

Read prototype/specs/project-plan.md:

• Extract dependency graph (planned wave structure)
• Note which epics were [P] (parallelizable) — did parallel execution actually work?
• Extract ## Shared Artifact Surface — what was planned vs. what emerged

3.2 From Feature Workspaces

For each workspace in FEATURE_WORKSPACES:

Epic mapping — read spec.md frontmatter epic_id to map the workspace to its prototype epic. Read epic_sources (traceability tags like {PRD:CAP-###}, {SAD:ADR-NNNN}) — these tags are the lookup key linking this prototype epic to V2 epic intelligence in Phase 3.4.1. Read the original epic detail file at prototype/specs/plan/{EPIC_ID}.md for the planned baseline.

spec.md:

• Extract resolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers — these are now confirmed requirements
• Extract ## Stress-Test Findings (STF-###) — edge cases discovered
• Extract ## Clarifications — decisions made during clarify phase
• Extract scope changes relative to original epic detail file
• Extract requirements (FR-###, TR-###, OR-###, RR-###)
• Extract ## Problem Statement and ## Scope — what the feature actually addressed (vs. what was planned)

plan.md:

• Extract architecture decisions (AD-###) — candidates for promotion to project-level ADRs
• Extract ## Instructions Check findings
• Extract ## Technical Context refinements
• Extract ## Requirement Coverage Map — any gaps noted

tasks.md:

• Extract bug tasks ([BUG:*]) — patterns of recurring issues
• Extract ## Deferred Issues — work that was pushed back
• Extract actual dependency patterns vs. planned dependencies
• Extract implementation complexity signals (many sub-tasks, phase bloat)
• Extract export annotations (→ exports: Symbol?) — actual shared artifact surface produced

qc-report.md:

• Extract Overall Verdict and category results
• Extract failure patterns across features
• Extract requirement-gap findings
• Extract security findings
• Extract coverage metrics

manual-test.md (when present):

• Extract demo scenarios and manual verification steps — these are proven demo plans
• Extract any user-facing flows that proved effective for validation

research.md (when present):

• Extract domain best practices and patterns that informed the implementation
• Extract any sources or findings worth carrying into V2

data-model.md / contracts/ (when present):

• Extract actual entity schemas, relationships, and attributes as implemented
• Extract API contract definitions, endpoint signatures, and request/response shapes
• These represent the real shared artifact surface, not the planned one

checklists/ (when present):

• Extract checklist outcomes per quality dimension — which dimensions passed clean vs. needed remediation
• Extract any flagged items that revealed systemic quality gaps

autopilot-log.md (when present):

• Extract halt events — what blocked automation
• Extract decision events — what the agent chose automatically
• Extract phase durations from ## Run Summary
• Extract pipeline hint effectiveness — did skip_clarify / skip_checklist / lightweight hints pay off?

Compile Prototype Epic Intelligence record — for each workspace, build a structured record containing:

• Prototype epic ID + source tags (the lookup key)
• Feature workspace path
• V2 disposition recommendation: KEPT (carry forward as-is), MERGED (combine with another epic), SPLIT (break into smaller epics), or DROPPED (work proved unnecessary) — with rationale from the scope refinements analysis
• Resolved requirements, clarifications, and stress-test findings
• Architecture decisions (AD-###) with promotion recommendation
• Actual integration points, data models, and API surfaces (from data-model.md/contracts/)
• Bug patterns, deferred issues, and actual complexity signals
• QC results and quality dimension outcomes
• Automation experience (halts, decision patterns, hint effectiveness)
• Pre-digested enrichment material mapped to the V2 epic detail template fields:
• Problem Statement seed (from spec.md Problem Statement + retrospective pain points)
• Scope seed: Included/Excluded/Edge (from spec.md Scope + stress-test findings as edge cases)
• Demo Plan seed (from manual-test.md scenarios)
• Draft Scenarios/Objectives seed (from spec.md user stories/objectives, refined by QC evidence)
• Integration Points seed (from data-model.md/contracts/ actual surfaces + plan.md AD-###)
• Implementation Signals seed (from actual code patterns + tasks.md export annotations)
• Assumptions & Risks seed (from resolved clarifications as confirmed assumptions; from bug patterns and deferred issues as risks)
• Draft Success Criteria seed (from QC verdicts and coverage metrics — what actually proved measurable)
• Pipeline Hints recommendation (from autopilot-log.md hint effectiveness)

3.3 From Implemented Code

Scan prototype/[SOURCE_ROOT]/:

• Extract actual module/directory structure (compare to SAD container/component views)
• Extract API surface: route definitions, endpoint handlers, exported interfaces
• Extract data models: schema definitions, entity types, database migrations
• Extract third-party dependencies from build manifests in prototype/
• Extract configuration surface: environment variables, config files, feature flags
• Extract test structure: test file locations, test utilities, fixtures
• Note patterns: error handling approach, logging approach, authentication/authorization patterns

3.4 Write Retrospective

Create specs/prototype-retrospective.md:

# Prototype Retrospective
 
> Structured analysis of the first-pass implementation, used as input for V2 bootstrap regeneration.
> Generated by `/sddp-regen` on [ISO date].
 
-**Prototype Location**: `prototype/`
-**Prototype Git SHA**: [SHA]
 
## Discovered Requirements
 
Requirements that emerged during implementation but were not in the original PRD.
 
| Source | ID | Discovery | Description |
|--------|-----|-----------|-------------|
| [workspace] | STF-### / FR-### | Clarification / QC / Implementation | ... |
 
## Architectural Learnings
 
What the implementation revealed about the architecture.
 
### Validated Decisions
ADRs and architecture choices that proved correct.
 
### Revised Decisions
Architecture assumptions that implementation disproved or refined.
 
### Emergent Patterns
Patterns that emerged organically and should be formalized.
 
### Actual vs. Planned Structure
Comparison of SAD container/component views to actual module structure.
 
## Scope Refinements
 
### Over-Scoped
Capabilities or requirements that were more complex than necessary.
 
### Under-Scoped
Areas that needed more attention than originally planned.
 
### Missing Capabilities
New capabilities discovered that should be first-class in V2.
 
## Quality Insights
 
### Recurring Bug Patterns
Common bug categories from QC across features.
 
### Coverage Analysis
Test coverage patterns — what was well-tested, what was fragile.
 
### Security Findings
Security issues discovered during QC.
 
## Dependency Graph Accuracy
 
### Planned vs. Actual
How well the project plan's wave structure and dependency ordering matched reality.
 
### Shared Artifact Surface
Planned shared entities/APIs/modules vs. what actually emerged.
 
## Operational Learnings
 
Deployment, CI/CD, and operational insights (when DOD was present).
 
## Risk Reductions
 
Risks and assumptions from the original specs that are now resolved or confirmed.
 
## Open Questions
 
Questions that remain unresolved and should inform V2 planning.

3.4.1 Write Prototype Epic Intelligence

Create specs/prototype-epic-intelligence.md — a companion to the retrospective, organized by prototype epic ID. This document is the structured input that project-planning consumes in Phase 4.4 to enrich V2 epic detail files via source-tag matching.

# Prototype Epic Intelligence
 
> Per-epic learnings mined from feature workspaces, structured for V2 epic detail enrichment.
> Generated by `/sddp-regen` on [ISO date].
> Lookup key: source tags (`{PRD:CAP-###}`, `{SAD:ADR-NNNN}`, `{DOD:DDR-N}`) match V2 epic tags.
 
## Prototype Epic E001 — [Epic Title]
 
-**Source Tags**: {PRD:CAP-###} (and/or {SAD:ADR-NNNN}, {DOD:DDR-N})
-**Feature Workspace**: `00001-feature-name`
-**V2 Disposition**: [KEPT|MERGED with E###|SPLIT into E###/E###|DROPPED] — [rationale from scope refinements]
 
### Resolved Requirements
-[FR-###/TR-###/OR-###: final requirement as implemented, with any clarifications folded in]
 
### Architecture Decisions
-[AD-###: decision] — [promotion recommendation: promote to project ADR / keep feature-level / supersede]
 
### Actual Integration Points & Shared Surface
-[Entity/API/library actually produced, with consumer epics]
 
### Quality & Complexity Signals
-QC verdict: [PASS/FAIL with category breakdown]
-Recurring bug patterns: [categories and counts]
-Deferred issues: [what was pushed back and why]
-Actual complexity vs. planned: [signal]
 
### Automation Experience
-Halt events: [what blocked autopilot]
-Pipeline hint effectiveness: [which hints paid off / backfired]
 
### V2 Epic Detail Enrichment Seeds
-**Problem Statement seed**: [from spec.md Problem Statement + retrospective pain points]
-**Scope seed**: Included [..] / Excluded [..] / Edge Cases [from STF-### findings]
-**Demo Plan seed**: [from manual-test.md proven scenarios]
-**Draft Scenarios/Objectives seed**: [from spec.md stories/objectives, refined by QC evidence]
-**Integration Points seed**: [from data-model.md/contracts/ actual surfaces]
-**Implementation Signals seed**: [from actual code patterns + tasks.md exports]
-**Assumptions & Risks seed**: Assumptions [from resolved clarifications] / Risks [from bug patterns and deferred issues]
-**Draft Success Criteria seed**: [from QC verdicts and coverage metrics]
-**Pipeline Hints recommendation**: [skip_clarify / skip_checklist / lightweight — with rationale from autopilot experience, or "none" if no automation data]
 
## Prototype Epic E002 — [Epic Title]
[repeat the structure above for each prototype epic]

3.5 Present Findings

Interactive mode: present a summary of the retrospective findings organized by category count, ask the user to review specs/prototype-retrospective.md and specs/prototype-epic-intelligence.md and confirm before proceeding to regeneration.

AUTOPILOT = true: proceed directly to Phase 4.

4. Regenerate Canonical Bootstrap Artifacts

Execute the bootstrap workflows inline, in order. Each receives the full retrospective context plus the original prototype document as baseline.

Answer Retrieval Rule: Do not ask the user for information that is already resolved in the prototype context (e.g. product name, technology stack, runtime, frameworks, or database choices), unless a change is explicitly proposed in the retrospective. Pre-populate all choices from the archived files under prototype/ and the compiled retrospective.

4.1 Regenerate Product Document

Report: "Regenerating specs/prd.md from prototype learnings."

Execute `.github/skills/product-document/SKILL.md` inline with enriched context:

Provide as workflow input:

• "Regenerate the Product Document informed by the prototype retrospective at specs/prototype-retrospective.md and the original PRD at prototype/specs/prd.md. Incorporate discovered requirements, scope refinements, missing capabilities, and resolved open questions. Preserve CAP-### identifiers where the underlying capability still holds. Add new capabilities with new IDs. Remove capabilities that proved unnecessary. Update success metrics based on actual QC and implementation evidence."

The workflow will detect MODE = CREATE (since specs/prd.md does not exist) and produce a fresh document.

4.2 Regenerate Technical Context Document

Report: "Regenerating specs/sad.md from prototype learnings."

Execute `.github/skills/system-design/SKILL.md` inline with enriched context:

Provide as workflow input:

• "Regenerate the Technical Context Document informed by the prototype retrospective at specs/prototype-retrospective.md and the original SAD at prototype/specs/sad.md. The actual implementation is archived at prototype/[SOURCE_ROOT]/. Promote validated feature-level architecture decisions (AD-###) to project-level ADRs. Revise or supersede ADRs that implementation disproved. Update C4 diagrams to reflect the actual module structure discovered. Incorporate emergent patterns as formalized architecture guidance. Preserve ADR-NNNN identifiers where decisions still hold."

4.3 Regenerate Deployment & Operations Document

Skip if original prototype had no DOD (HAS_DOD = false). Ask user: "The prototype had no Deployment & Operations Document. Create one for V2?" Interactive: wait for answer. AUTOPILOT = true: skip.

When proceeding:

Report: "Regenerating specs/dod.md from prototype learnings."

Execute `.github/skills/deployment-operations/SKILL.md` inline with enriched context:

Provide as workflow input:

• "Regenerate the Deployment & Operations Document informed by the prototype retrospective at specs/prototype-retrospective.md and the original DOD at prototype/specs/dod.md. Incorporate operational learnings, actual CI/CD patterns that emerged, and deployment insights from the prototype. Preserve DDR-### identifiers where decisions still hold."

4.4 Regenerate Project Plan

Report: "Regenerating specs/project-plan.md from prototype learnings."

Execute `.github/skills/project-planning/SKILL.md` inline with enriched context:

Provide as workflow input:

• "Regenerate the Project Plan informed by the prototype retrospective at specs/prototype-retrospective.md, the prototype epic intelligence at specs/prototype-epic-intelligence.md, and the original project plan at prototype/specs/project-plan.md. The V2 plan is a clean decomposition — it may have fewer, more, or completely different epics than the prototype. Merge prototype epics that implementation proved belong together, split epics that were too coarse, add new epics for capabilities or infrastructure the prototype uncovered, and drop epics for work that proved unnecessary. Use the corrected dependency ordering based on actual build experience. Epic numbering starts fresh from E001. Feature workspace numbering starts fresh from 00001. Do not carry over prototype epic IDs or structure — treat the regenerated PRD as the sole source of capability decomposition, informed by the retrospective's scope refinements and dependency graph accuracy analysis. Read specs/prototype-epic-intelligence.md and enrich each V2 epic detail file by matching its source tags ({PRD:CAP-###} / {SAD:ADR-NNNN} / {DOD:DDR-N}) to the prototype epic intelligence sections — synthesize from all matching sources for merged epics, pull only the relevant slice for split epics, and generate from PRD/SAD/DOD as usual for genuinely new epics with no tag match. Adopt prototype Pipeline Hints recommendations when the V2 epic covers the same scope and the prototype ran via autopilot."

4.5 Regenerate README

Regenerate README.md at the project root, informed by the new specs/prd.md. The README should reflect V2, not the prototype. Include a note that prototype/ contains the archived first-pass implementation.

5. Reconcile and Report

5.1 Run Init in Amend Mode

Execute `.github/skills/init-project/SKILL.md` inline in AMEND mode:

Provide as workflow input:

• "Amend project instructions to reflect any technology stack, testing policy, or source layout changes discovered during the prototype. Reference specs/prototype-retrospective.md for learnings. Preserve all existing principles unless implementation evidence contradicts them."

5.2 Register All Documents

Update .github/sddp-config.md with the regenerated document paths:

• ## Product Document → **Path**: specs/prd.md
• ## Technical Context Document → **Path**: specs/sad.md
• ## Deployment & Operations Document → **Path**: specs/dod.md (when regenerated)
• ## Project Plan → **Path**: specs/project-plan.md

Preserve all other config sections unchanged.

5.3 Diff Summary

For each canonical document, produce a structured comparison:

## Regeneration Diff Summary
 
### Product Document (prd.md)
-**Capabilities**: [N original] → [M regenerated] ([added], [removed], [refined])
-**Key changes**: [bullet list of major differences]
 
### Technical Context Document (sad.md)
-**ADRs**: [N original] → [M regenerated] ([new], [superseded], [preserved])
-**Key changes**: [bullet list]
 
### Deployment & Operations Document (dod.md)
-**DDRs**: [N original] → [M regenerated]
-**Key changes**: [bullet list]
 
### Project Plan (project-plan.md)
-**Epics**: [N original] → [M regenerated]
-**Waves**: [N original] → [M regenerated]
-**Epic detail enrichment**: [N] V2 epics enriched from prototype intelligence ([merged], [split], [new], [dropped])
-**Key changes**: [bullet list]

5.4 Final Report

Output:

• Prototype archive location and manifest path
• Insights mined: count per category (discovered requirements, architectural learnings, scope refinements, quality insights, operational learnings, epic intelligence records)
• Intelligence document: specs/prototype-epic-intelligence.md ([N] prototype epic records with V2 disposition and enrichment seeds)
• Documents regenerated: list with paths
• Key differences from prototype (top 5)
• Registration confirmation
• Next step: commit the regeneration, then /sddp-autopilot for the first V2 epic
• Suggested commit message: docs: regenerate V2 bootstrap from prototype learnings

</workflow>