Skill v1.0.0
currentAutomated scan100/100version: "1.0.0" name: regression-test description: Run the DIYLC end-to-end regression suite, which renders ~700 sample .diy projects and compares PNG exports and netlists against reference outputs. Use after any change to rendering, component drawing, serialization, netlist or analyzer logic, or when asked to check for regressions or regenerate reference files.
Running the DIYLC regression suite
RegressionTestRunner (in diylc-swing/src/test/java/org/diylc/) loads every sample project under diylc-regression-data/input, exports a PNG and extracts netlists, and compares both against reference files produced by a known-good build. It is the only automated coverage of component appearance and of the file format end to end — unit tests do not touch either.
Always ask before running the full suite, and never run PREPARE without explicit instruction.
Modes
- `TEST` — compares against the reference files and writes a CSV report plus visual diff images.
This is what you almost always want.
- `PREPARE` — regenerates the reference PNGs and netlists from the current build. This
overwrites the golden copy and is correct only once a human has inspected the differences and decided they are intended. Never run it on your own initiative.
Easiest path
If the maintainer is at their IDE, the .run/RegressionTestRunner.run.xml IntelliJ configuration already has the arguments and JVM flags. Offer that first.
From the terminal
The runner needs the --add-opens / --add-exports flags and a classpath spanning all three modules; mvn exec:java will not work because it runs in Maven's own classloader and fails to find Reflections. Build a classpath and fork a JVM:
cd diylcSP=/tmp # or the session scratchpadmvn -q -pl diylc-swing -am test-compilemvn -q -pl diylc-swing dependency:build-classpath -Dmdep.outputFile=$SP/cp-swing.txt -Dmdep.includeScope=testmvn -q -pl diylc-core dependency:build-classpath -Dmdep.outputFile=$SP/cp-core.txt -Dmdep.includeScope=testmvn -q -pl diylc-library dependency:build-classpath -Dmdep.outputFile=$SP/cp-lib.txt -Dmdep.includeScope=testjava \--add-exports java.desktop/com.apple.eawt.event=ALL-UNNAMED \--add-exports java.desktop/com.apple.eio=ALL-UNNAMED \--add-opens java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED \--add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED \--add-opens java.base/java.text=ALL-UNNAMED \--add-opens java.desktop/java.awt=ALL-UNNAMED \--add-opens java.desktop/java.awt.font=ALL-UNNAMED \--add-opens java.desktop/java.awt.geom=ALL-UNNAMED \-cp "diylc-swing/target/test-classes:diylc-swing/target/classes:diylc-core/target/classes:diylc-library/target/classes:$(cat $SP/cp-swing.txt):$(cat $SP/cp-core.txt):$(cat $SP/cp-lib.txt)" \org.diylc.RegressionTestRunner \"$(cd .. && pwd)/diylc-regression-data" TEST [filter]
Sanity-check the log line Presenter - Current DIYLC version: 6.4.0 near the end. If it reports 5.0.0, the --add-opens flags are missing and the run is invalid.
Arguments
- Path to
diylc-regression-data TESTorPREPARE- Optional filter — a substring matched against file paths. Use it. The full suite is ~700
projects; while narrowing down an issue, run one file or one directory at a time (e.g. splitter2, or guitar).
Reading the results
- A CSV report is written to
diylc-regression-data/reports/, named with the timestamp and version,
listing each file as OK or failed with the reason (Images do not match, Netlists do not match with switches, Netlists do not match without switches).
- Rendered output and visual diff images, with red rectangles around every differing region, go
to diylc-regression-data/output/ (not under version control).
- Reports are kept as historical evidence. If a run was exploratory rather than a real verification,
delete the generated CSV afterwards so the reports directory stays meaningful — and check git status before finishing, since the runner writes into the repo.
Interpreting a failure
A difference is not automatically a bug, but it is always a change the maintainer must see. Report which files differ and what kind of difference it is; where an image diff exists, point at the file so it can be looked at. Do not conclude "no regressions" from a filtered run — say exactly which subset was run.