beefiker/superloopy/superloopy-loop
Claude Code and agent skill by beefiker/superloopy
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Use Superloopy's lightweight strict-evidence loop for Codex tasks that need durable progress, criteria, and artifact-backed completion.
Install
npx vskill@latest install beefiker/superloopy/superloopy-loopSKILL.md
superloopy-loop
Use this skill when the user asks for Superloopy, loopywork, lpy, a loop harness, durable criteria, evidence-backed completion, strict-but-light task flow, or guided next actions.
Contract
- State lives in
.superloopy/, or.superloopy/sessions/<id>/when--session-idis used. - Do not hand-edit
.superloopy/goals.json; use the CLI. - A criterion can pass only after a real artifact exists under the active evidence root.
- User steering must use
SUPERLOOPY_STEERJSON; do not hand-edit.superloopy/goals.json. - Executor receipts should end with
SUPERLOOPY_EVIDENCE: <path-under-active-evidence-root>. - Legacy
EVIDENCE_RECORDEDreceipts remain accepted for compatibility. - Tests are useful evidence, but completion requires the Superloopy evidence artifact.
- Use
superloopy loop provewhen an active goal needs command-backed evidence for its next unresolved criterion. - Keep the workflow lightweight unless the task genuinely needs heavier review.
- A leading
loopykeyword wakes the loop engineer: take the rest of the prompt as the brief, run the loop yourself, and report progress instead of asking the user to type Superloopy commands. loopywork,$lpy, andlpyare lighter prompt triggers; they inject guidance but never mutate.superloopy/state by themselves.- Full Loopy runs default to direct, concise, complete user-facing progress and final responses. Exact
say-it-straight off/직설 모드 끄기andsay-it-straight on/직설 모드 켜기controls apply only to the current incomplete loop; new loops reset this default to enabled. - This output overlay changes wording only. It never silently rewrites supplied prose, task artifacts, code, documentation, comments, evidence, quotations, or user source text; direct artifact editing remains explicit-only.
i-have-adhdstill owns structure, andhumanize-koreanstill owns Korean artifact rewriting.
Load on demand
These references hold the situational detail. Read the one a row names when its condition holds; the rules above and below apply to every run.
| Read | When | |
|---|---|---|
| CLI flow | Running Superloopy commands beyond the loop engineer's begin → guide → prove → check → finish path: create, capture, manual evidence, trace, report, a blocked check repair plan, custom review/checkpoint gate workflows, or a cache-satisfied final proof. | |
| Continuation engine | The Stop hook re-prompted you ("Superloopy continuation"), a loop shown blocked or paused in superloopy loop status, a quota/usage limit, or scheduling an auto-resume. | |
| Evidence audit | Running superloopy loop audit, dispatching assayer, or handling a failed, inconclusive, or blocked audit. | |
| Crew | Before dispatching any subagent (solo light delegation or loopy team/crew): parent responsibilities, handoff/fleet bookkeeping, the self-contained dispatch contract, subagent lifecycle, and agent allocation. | |
| Reassurance copy | The reassurance-copy condition below applies. |
Loop engineer (loopy keyword)
When the user opens a message with loopy <task>, act as the loop engineer:
- Start once with
superloopy loop begin --brief "<task>" --mode light --json; do not create a second plan if one is active. - Drive each step from
superloopy loop guide --json, prove criteria withsuperloopy loop prove -- <command>, preflight withsuperloopy loop check, then finish withsuperloopy loop finish --evidence "<summary>" --artifact .superloopy/evidence/gate.json --json. - The user types only
loopy <task>. You run every Superloopy command and report progress as criteria proven and the next step. loopywith no task asks what to build;loopymid-loop resumes from existing state. After aloopyprompt, the packaged Stop hook keeps this session going while criteria remain, until the user sends a plain prompt (SUPERLOOPY_STOP_HOOK=ondrives every session,offdisables it). If it reports a worker that stopped without proof, treat that worker's reply as unproven.
Execution discipline
The loop engineer directive carries three rules distilled from a component-level harness study (arXiv 2609.20804). For strong models, most avoidable cost is redundant verification, unchanged re-runs of a failing check, and many small re-patches.
- Prove each criterion once with the narrowest command that decides it, then move on. Do not re-run passing proof or broad suites between criteria;
loop finishre-runs every passed command-backed criterion before it completes (trusted commands only; commandless proof gets an artifact-existence check).loop checkvalidates artifacts and does not re-run anything. - When a proof fails, its output is already in the capture artifact. Read the failing part (tail or search), then change the code or the proof command before proving again; if the criterion itself is wrong, ask the user to revise it with a
revise_criterionsteer. After 3 consecutive failures of one criterion with the same command, exit, and normalized output tail,prove,capture,trace,check, andreportemit arepeated-failing-proofwarning. Normalization ignores run-to-run noise (timestamps, durations, labeled PIDs and ports, UUIDs, hashes, temp paths, stack positions, numbers of 10+ digits such as epoch times) but keeps other numbers, so a changed assertion value or pass/fail count breaks the streak. Any other evidence for that criterion, including a pass, a manualloop evidencerecord, or a revised criterion, resets it. The warning is advisory and never blocks; withSUPERLOOPY_STOP_HOOK=on, the Stop hook's no-progress cap (3 iterations without a new pass) still marks a stalled loopblocked. - Batch independent reads and shell steps into one call, and land each file change as one coherent edit.
- After compaction, the recovery capsule lists failing proof with its artifact path. Re-read that artifact instead of re-running the command to see the error again.
Reassurance-copy gate (conditional)
- Decide from the affected artifact: if it creates or changes user-visible Korean product copy about behavior, add a plan criterion for RC-1 through RC-4 and Korean naturalness.
- State supplied outcomes, fallback, recovery, or next action; preserve verified privacy/legal commitments; never invent behavior.
- Apply
humanize-koreansemantic review for misplaced modifiers. - Ignore internal logs, developer docs, quotations, general/marketing prose, and non-Korean copy.
Read the detailed reassurance-copy reference when this condition applies. Artifact ownership decides the condition; prompt wording does not.
Two tiers: solo and crew (loopy team)
The loop engineer directive is injected for every loopy prompt, and it scales to the work:
- Solo (default). A plain
loopy <task>drives one agent through the loop. The directive still permits light delegation: if the work splits into 2+ genuinely independent slices, you may fan them out with the native subagent controls exposed by the current host; keep each assignment self-contained. For a single cohesive change, stay solo. - Crew (`loopy team <task>` / `loopy crew <task>`, the connected one-word `loopycrew <task>`, or the standalone `ultrawork <task>`). The same engineer escalates into full fan-out: dispatch the crew across independent lanes, collect them with the host's native lifecycle controls, and record only artifact-backed proof. The escalation keyword is stripped from the brief that seeds the loop. This is the active counterpart to "Optional Subagent-Driven Mode" below — same dispatch contract, receipt gate, and mandatory
handoff/fleettracking.
Each crew dispatch uses the configured name when the host exposes named selection: forge to build, sentinel to review, probe to test, arbiter to gate, assayer to audit, and pathfinder to navigate. The assignment also stays self-contained (TASK: act as <role> ...). The orchestrator itself runs on the model the user selected in the host (gpt-6-astra is allowed when selected); crew lanes keep their model-policy.json pins and never inherit the orchestrator's model. The host-owned stop callback observes the actual role identity; if the host cannot attest that identity or model, report role_unverified or model_unverified.
Both tiers are steering, not enforcement: the directive instructs the main agent, and actual spawning depends on the host's native multi-agent tool being available. Superloopy never spawns; it gates the evidence workers deliver. See "Optional Subagent-Driven Mode" for the full dispatch contract and crew roles.
Optional Subagent-Driven Mode
Use project custom agents from .codex/agents/ only when the user asks for subagents or the work has independent implementation, review, and QA lanes. The normal single-agent Superloopy flow remains the default for small changes.
Superloopy provisions and tracks these agents; the host (Codex) spawns them. Superloopy never spawns. The host spawn surface cannot reliably select a bundled TOML role, model, or reasoning effort by name, so every dispatch must be self-contained and judged by delivered evidence — never by the role label requested. See docs/superloopy-host-contract.md.
Plugin installs bootstrap the superloopy command wrapper and bundled custom agents on the first approved SessionStart hook. If the host does not run that hook, run node src/cli.js install --json from the Superloopy checkout or installed plugin root. superloopy agents install remains available to copy only the bundled custom agents into the personal Codex agents directory ($CODEX_HOME/agents when set, otherwise ~/.codex/agents). Restart Codex after installation.
Before dispatching any worker, read Crew: it carries the parent agent responsibilities, the dispatch contract, the subagent lifecycle, and agent allocation.
Quality Gate
Every listed artifact must exist, be non-empty, and live under the active evidence root. Superloopy also accepts strict review gates and matrix gates when reviewer/architect, executor QA, rerun, artifact, and coverage fields validate. loop review and loop finish always write the default gate. A review gate is JSON you write by hand and pass to loop checkpoint --quality-gate; write one only when sentinel, probe, and arbiter each actually ran, and sign it as Crew describes under "Review gate actors".
For executor receipts, use the active evidence root. A global loop normally records under .superloopy/evidence/; a scoped loop records under .superloopy/sessions/<id>/evidence/. If a receipt is missing or invalid, the receipt block message names the active evidence root to repair.
Keep the human final gate report and the Superloopy quality gate artifact separate. A arbiter report is Markdown evidence (for example .superloopy/evidence/arbiter-final-gate-report.md). The superloopy loop review and superloopy loop finish --artifact flag writes the machine-validated quality gate artifact and must point to JSON, normally .superloopy/evidence/gate.json. Never pass the Markdown report path as the finish artifact.
Steering
Accept only structured prompt-level steering:
This is the start of the file. Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/superloopy-loop/SKILL.md
Popularity
- 7-day trend score
- 0
Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/beefiker/superloopy/superloopy-loop)