version: "1.0.2" name: team-design description: 'Use for drafting technical designs with independent review.' effort: medium argument-hint: "[docs/plans/<id>/]"

Before this operation, read artifact schema. Before each consuming step, read its linked shared rules. Resolve links from this installed SKILL.md directory. If a required read fails, stop that step and report its resolved path. Never use checkout fallback or recursive loading.

Before each dispatch or retry, read host dispatch and supply its resolved installed paths.

Before review dispatch, supply the installed plugin root, the resolved skills/team/references/design-reviewer.md path, the absolute installed skills/team/ directory as the base of that brief's links, and the resolved paths of the manuals its ## Review brief links, all in skills/team/references/: code-reviewer.md, code-standards.md, design-template.md, decisions.md, findings.md, writing.md, and cross-model-review.md when the prompt carries ## External review input. Require reads before work.

Team Design

Before finalizing prose you author, read the writing standards. Relay completed review reports unchanged.

No mid-run prompt fires.

Input

$ARGUMENTS is the artifact directory docs/plans/<id>/; if empty, the discovery command resolves it. Resolve <team-skill-dir> to the absolute directory containing skills/team/SKILL.md. From the repository root, run:

"<team-skill-dir>/discover-topic.sh" "${ARGUMENTS:-}" "5-research.md"

• Printed a path: use it as $ARGUMENTS; announce it when no explicit

arg was given.

• Printed nothing: do not hard-error. Fire AskUserQuestion with a

Setup header and labeled options:

• Run the producer — run /team-research docs/plans/<id>/ to produce

5-research.md.

• Give a path — the user supplies the docs/plans/<id>/ directory.

Execution

1. Use the directory resolved in ## Input.
2. If $ARGUMENTS/6-design.md already exists, skip to step 3 — never re-draft

an existing design (durable state rules). Otherwise dispatch design-author; it writes $ARGUMENTS/6-design.md with frontmatter revision: 0.

1. Design review gate. Run

"<team-skill-dir>/scripts/design-review-status.sh" "$ARGUMENTS". Exit 0 (passed): skip to step 4 — never re-review a passed design. Exit 1 (pending): its second field <n> is this round's number. Exit 2: stop and report its stderr.

Each round:

a. Cross-model pass. Read the cross-model review and run its ## Design-review pass (gate: TEAM_DISABLE_CROSS_MODEL). Any skip continues with the reviewer alone; the pass never blocks the gate. b. Review. Read the ## Review brief from the design reviewer brief, substitute the artifact directory, attach the paths named at the top of this file, and give it to a fresh-context read-only Explore subagent. c. Record. Write the reviewer's report verbatim to a scratch file outside $ARGUMENTS with the Write tool, then run node "<team-skill-dir>/scripts/record-design-review.mjs" --dir "$ARGUMENTS" --report <report-file>. Its JSON line names the round and verdict. Exit 3 is an unparseable verdict (below); any other non-zero exit halts loudly with its stderr. d. Act on the verdict:

• APPROVE or COMMENT — the review passes. Advance.
• REQUEST CHANGES — re-dispatch design-author with the reviewer's

findings verbatim; it re-drafts and increments revision: <n+1>, then a fresh round runs. No round cap; the loop ends on the verdict.

• Unparseable verdict or reviewer crash — retry the review once with

the error; on second failure, halt loudly. Fail closed — never advance on a missing verdict (verified results rules).

1. **Stop once $ARGUMENTS/6-design.md exists and

design-review-status.sh exits 0.**

Report design path and tell the user: "Next: run `/team-structure docs/plans/<id>/`"