bradfeld/ceos/ceos-checkup
Claude Code and agent skill by bradfeld/ceos
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Use when assessing organizational health across the Six Key Components with the EOS Organizational Checkup
Install
npx vskill@latest install bradfeld/ceos/ceos-checkupSKILL.md
ceos-checkup
Measure organizational health using the standard EOS Organizational Checkup — a 20-question assessment across the Six Key Components (Vision, People, Data, Issues, Process, Traction). Each leadership team member rates the organization 1-5 on each question, and scores are calculated per component and overall. Use quarterly or semi-annually to track progress and surface alignment gaps.
Not for: Individual team member evaluation (use ceos-people), V/TO refresh (use ceos-annual), or quarterly Rock setting (use ceos-quarterly-planning).
When to Use
- "Run the organizational checkup" or "let's do the EOS checkup"
- "How healthy is the organization?" or "team health assessment"
- "Score the six key components" or "rate our EOS components"
- "Show checkup history" or "review past checkups"
- "Compare team ratings" or "show alignment gaps"
- "Are we improving on Vision/People/Data/Issues/Process/Traction?"
- Any discussion about overall organizational health, EOS component scores, or team alignment
Context
Finding the CEOS Repository
Search upward from the current directory for the .ceos marker file. This file marks the root of the CEOS repository.
If .ceos is not found, stop and tell the user: "Not in a CEOS repository. Clone your CEOS repo and run setup.sh first."
Sync before use: Once you find the CEOS root, run git -C <ceos_root> pull --ff-only --quiet 2>/dev/null to get the latest data from teammates. If it fails (conflict or offline), continue silently with local data.
Key Files
| File | Purpose | |
|---|---|---|
data/checkups/ | Checkup result files (one per session, dated) | |
templates/checkup.md | Template for new checkup files | |
data/vision.md | V/TO — Core Values, Core Focus, targets (read-only) | |
data/accountability.md | Accountability Chart — team structure and seats (read-only) | |
data/rocks/ | Quarterly Rocks for Traction context (read-only) | |
data/scorecard/ | Weekly metrics for Data context (read-only) | |
data/people/ | People evaluations for People context (read-only) | |
data/issues/ | Open/resolved issues for Issues context (read-only) |
Checkup File Format
Each checkup is stored at data/checkups/YYYY-MM-DD.md with YAML frontmatter:
Ratings array: 20 integers (1-5), indexed by question number (index 0 = Question 1, index 19 = Question 20). Use null for unanswered questions.
The 20 Standard Questions
The EOS Organizational Checkup uses these 20 canonical questions, grouped by the Six Key Components:
Vision (Questions 1-6)
| # | Question | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | We have a clear vision in writing that has been properly communicated and is shared by everyone in the company. | |
| 2 | Our core values are clear, and we are hiring, reviewing, rewarding, and firing around them. | |
| 3 | Our Core Focus (core business) is clear, and we keep our people, systems and processes aligned and focused on it. | |
| 4 | Our 10-Year Target (big, long-range business goal) is clear, communicated regularly, and is shared by all. | |
| 5 | Our target market (definition of our ideal customer) is clear, and all of our marketing and sales efforts are focused on it. | |
| 6 | Our 3 Uniques (differentiators) are clear, and all of our marketing and sales efforts communicate them. |
People (Questions 7-10)
| # | Question | |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | We have a proven process for doing business with our customers. It has been named and visually illustrated, and all of our salespeople use it. | |
| 8 | All of the people in our organization are the "right people" (they fit our culture and share our core values). | |
| 9 | Our Accountability Chart (organizational chart that includes roles/responsibilities) is clear, complete, and constantly updated. | |
| 10 | Everyone is in the "right seat" (they "get it, want it, and have the capacity to do their jobs well"). |
Issues (Questions 11-12)
| # | Question | |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Our leadership team is open and honest, and demonstrates a high level of trust. | |
| 12 | All teams clearly identify, discuss, and solve issues for the long-term greater good of the company. |
Traction (Questions 13-15)
| # | Question | |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Everyone has Rocks (1 to 7 priorities per quarter) and is focused on them. | |
| 14 | Everyone is engaged in a regular Meeting Pulse (weekly, quarterly, annually). | |
| 15 | All meetings are on the same day and at the same time, have the same agenda, start on time, and end on time. |
Process (Question 16)
| # | Question | |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Our Core Processes are documented, simplified, and followed by all to consistently produce the results we want. |
Data (Questions 17-20)
| # | Question | |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | We have systems for receiving regular feedback from customers and employees, so we always know their level of satisfaction. | |
| 18 | A Scorecard for tracking weekly metrics/measurables is in place. | |
| 19 | Everyone in the organization has at least one number they are accountable for keeping on track each week. | |
| 20 | We have a budget and are monitoring it regularly (e.g., monthly or quarterly). |
Rating Scale
| Rating | Meaning | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Strongly agree — this is firmly in place | |
| 4 | Agree — mostly in place, minor gaps | |
| 3 | Neutral — partially in place, needs work | |
| 2 | Disagree — significant gaps exist | |
| 1 | Strongly disagree — not in place at all |
Component Scoring
Each component score is the average of its questions across all participants:
| Component | Questions | Count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 1-6 | 6 | |
| People | 7-10 | 4 | |
| Issues | 11-12 | 2 | |
| Traction | 13-15 | 3 | |
| Process | 16 | 1 | |
| Data | 17-20 | 4 |
Overall score = average of all 20 questions across all participants.
Interpretation:
| Score | Rating | Action | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0-5.0 | Strong | Maintain — this component is working | |
| 3.0-3.9 | Needs attention | Discuss at L10 — identify specific gaps | |
| < 3.0 | Weak | IDS priority — create issues for action plans |
Process
Mode: Run
Use when conducting a new Organizational Checkup session with the leadership team.
Step 1: Setup
Ask for:
- Date: Default to today's date (
YYYY-MM-DD). - Participants: Read
data/accountability.mdto suggest team members. Ask: "Who is participating? (Default: everyone on the Accountability Chart)"
If data/accountability.md doesn't exist or is empty, ask the user to list participants manually.
Step 2: Check for Existing Checkup
Check if data/checkups/YYYY-MM-DD.md already exists for today's date.
- Exists with `status: complete`: "A checkup already exists for [date]. Open it to review, or create a new session?"
- Exists with `status: in_progress`: "An incomplete checkup exists for [date]. Resume where you left off, or start fresh?"
- Doesn't exist: Continue to Step 3.
Step 3: Cross-Reference Context (Optional)
Before starting questions, briefly review available CEOS data for context:
- Read
data/vision.mdfor Core Values and 1-Year Plan (Vision context) - Read recent
data/rocks/for current quarter's Rocks (Traction context) - Read
data/scorecard/metrics.mdfor active metrics (Data context) - Read
data/issues/open/for open issues count (Issues context)
Display a brief context summary:
If any data source is missing, note it and continue. The checkup doesn't require these — they provide context.
Step 4: Collect Ratings
Present the 20 questions organized by component. For each component:
- Display the component name and its questions
- For each participant, collect a rating (1-5) for each question
- Show running totals as you go
Collection approach: Present all questions for one component at a time. For each question, collect ratings from all participants before moving to the next question.
Example interaction:
After each component, display the component subtotal:
Progress tracking: Show progress after each component:
Step 5: Calculate Scores
After all 20 questions are rated:
- Per-component scores: Average all ratings for that component's questions across all participants.
- Per-participant scores: Average all 20 ratings for each individual.
- Overall score: Average of all 20 questions across all participants.
Step 6: Identify Strengths and Opportunities
- Strengths: Components scoring 4.0+ — these are working well.
- Opportunities: Components scoring below 3.0 — these need immediate attention.
- Attention needed: Components scoring 3.0-3.9 — monitor and improve.
If overall score < 2.5: Display warning: "Overall score below 2.5/5. Consider a focused IDS session to identify root causes across multiple components."
Step 7: Prompt for Action Items
For each component scoring below 3.5, ask: "Any specific action items for [Component]?"
Suggest relevant CEOS skills for low-scoring components:
| Component | Score < 3.0 | Suggested Skill | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | Low | "Consider running ceos-vto to refresh the Vision/Traction Organizer" | |
| People | Low | "Consider running ceos-people to evaluate right people, right seats" | |
| Data | Low | "Consider reviewing ceos-scorecard to strengthen weekly metrics" | |
| Issues | Low | "Consider running ceos-ids to process the open issues list" | |
| Process | Low | "Consider running ceos-process to document core processes" | |
| Traction | Low | "Consider reviewing ceos-rocks for Rock focus and ceos-l10 for meeting discipline" |
Step 8: Save the Checkup File
Build the file from templates/checkup.md:
- Replace
{{date}}with the session date - Replace
{{participants}}with participant names - Fill in the ratings arrays in the frontmatter
- Populate the component scores tables in the markdown body
- Fill in strengths, opportunities, and action items
- Set
status: complete
Show the complete file before writing. Ask: "Save this checkup?"
Write to data/checkups/YYYY-MM-DD.md.
Mode: Review
Use when reviewing historical checkup results and tracking trends over time.
Step 1: Read All Checkups
Read all files from data/checkups/. Parse YAML frontmatter for each.
If no files exist: "No checkups found. Run your first Organizational Checkup to establish a baseline."
Sort by date (most recent first).
Step 2: Display Summary Table
This is the start of the file. Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/ceos-checkup/SKILL.md
Popularity
- 7-day trend score
- 0
Refreshed 18 Mar 2026, 7 months ago.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/bradfeld/ceos/ceos-checkup)