bradfeld/ceos/ceos-checkup

Claude Code and agent skill by bradfeld/ceos

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Use when assessing organizational health across the Six Key Components with the EOS Organizational Checkup

Install

npx vskill@latest install bradfeld/ceos/ceos-checkup

SKILL.md

ceos-checkup

Measure organizational health using the standard EOS Organizational Checkup — a 20-question assessment across the Six Key Components (Vision, People, Data, Issues, Process, Traction). Each leadership team member rates the organization 1-5 on each question, and scores are calculated per component and overall. Use quarterly or semi-annually to track progress and surface alignment gaps.

Not for: Individual team member evaluation (use ceos-people), V/TO refresh (use ceos-annual), or quarterly Rock setting (use ceos-quarterly-planning).

When to Use

  • "Run the organizational checkup" or "let's do the EOS checkup"
  • "How healthy is the organization?" or "team health assessment"
  • "Score the six key components" or "rate our EOS components"
  • "Show checkup history" or "review past checkups"
  • "Compare team ratings" or "show alignment gaps"
  • "Are we improving on Vision/People/Data/Issues/Process/Traction?"
  • Any discussion about overall organizational health, EOS component scores, or team alignment

Context

Finding the CEOS Repository

Search upward from the current directory for the .ceos marker file. This file marks the root of the CEOS repository.

If .ceos is not found, stop and tell the user: "Not in a CEOS repository. Clone your CEOS repo and run setup.sh first."

Sync before use: Once you find the CEOS root, run git -C <ceos_root> pull --ff-only --quiet 2>/dev/null to get the latest data from teammates. If it fails (conflict or offline), continue silently with local data.

Key Files
FilePurpose
data/checkups/Checkup result files (one per session, dated)
templates/checkup.mdTemplate for new checkup files
data/vision.mdV/TO — Core Values, Core Focus, targets (read-only)
data/accountability.mdAccountability Chart — team structure and seats (read-only)
data/rocks/Quarterly Rocks for Traction context (read-only)
data/scorecard/Weekly metrics for Data context (read-only)
data/people/People evaluations for People context (read-only)
data/issues/Open/resolved issues for Issues context (read-only)
Checkup File Format

Each checkup is stored at data/checkups/YYYY-MM-DD.md with YAML frontmatter:

yaml
date: "2026-02-15"
participants:
- name: "Brad Feld"
ratings: [5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 5, 4, 3, 4, 5, 4, 3]
- name: "Sarah Chen"
ratings: [4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 4, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 4, 5, 4]
status: complete # in_progress | complete
overall_score: 4.2
component_scores:
vision: 4.3
people: 4.1
data: 4.0
issues: 4.5
process: 3.5
traction: 4.3

Ratings array: 20 integers (1-5), indexed by question number (index 0 = Question 1, index 19 = Question 20). Use null for unanswered questions.

The 20 Standard Questions

The EOS Organizational Checkup uses these 20 canonical questions, grouped by the Six Key Components:

Vision (Questions 1-6)
#Question
1We have a clear vision in writing that has been properly communicated and is shared by everyone in the company.
2Our core values are clear, and we are hiring, reviewing, rewarding, and firing around them.
3Our Core Focus (core business) is clear, and we keep our people, systems and processes aligned and focused on it.
4Our 10-Year Target (big, long-range business goal) is clear, communicated regularly, and is shared by all.
5Our target market (definition of our ideal customer) is clear, and all of our marketing and sales efforts are focused on it.
6Our 3 Uniques (differentiators) are clear, and all of our marketing and sales efforts communicate them.
People (Questions 7-10)
#Question
7We have a proven process for doing business with our customers. It has been named and visually illustrated, and all of our salespeople use it.
8All of the people in our organization are the "right people" (they fit our culture and share our core values).
9Our Accountability Chart (organizational chart that includes roles/responsibilities) is clear, complete, and constantly updated.
10Everyone is in the "right seat" (they "get it, want it, and have the capacity to do their jobs well").
Issues (Questions 11-12)
#Question
11Our leadership team is open and honest, and demonstrates a high level of trust.
12All teams clearly identify, discuss, and solve issues for the long-term greater good of the company.
Traction (Questions 13-15)
#Question
13Everyone has Rocks (1 to 7 priorities per quarter) and is focused on them.
14Everyone is engaged in a regular Meeting Pulse (weekly, quarterly, annually).
15All meetings are on the same day and at the same time, have the same agenda, start on time, and end on time.
Process (Question 16)
#Question
16Our Core Processes are documented, simplified, and followed by all to consistently produce the results we want.
Data (Questions 17-20)
#Question
17We have systems for receiving regular feedback from customers and employees, so we always know their level of satisfaction.
18A Scorecard for tracking weekly metrics/measurables is in place.
19Everyone in the organization has at least one number they are accountable for keeping on track each week.
20We have a budget and are monitoring it regularly (e.g., monthly or quarterly).
Rating Scale
RatingMeaning
5Strongly agree — this is firmly in place
4Agree — mostly in place, minor gaps
3Neutral — partially in place, needs work
2Disagree — significant gaps exist
1Strongly disagree — not in place at all
Component Scoring

Each component score is the average of its questions across all participants:

ComponentQuestionsCount
Vision1-66
People7-104
Issues11-122
Traction13-153
Process161
Data17-204

Overall score = average of all 20 questions across all participants.

Interpretation:

ScoreRatingAction
4.0-5.0StrongMaintain — this component is working
3.0-3.9Needs attentionDiscuss at L10 — identify specific gaps
< 3.0WeakIDS priority — create issues for action plans

Process

Mode: Run

Use when conducting a new Organizational Checkup session with the leadership team.

Step 1: Setup

Ask for:

  • Date: Default to today's date (YYYY-MM-DD).
  • Participants: Read data/accountability.md to suggest team members. Ask: "Who is participating? (Default: everyone on the Accountability Chart)"

If data/accountability.md doesn't exist or is empty, ask the user to list participants manually.

Step 2: Check for Existing Checkup

Check if data/checkups/YYYY-MM-DD.md already exists for today's date.

  • Exists with `status: complete`: "A checkup already exists for [date]. Open it to review, or create a new session?"
  • Exists with `status: in_progress`: "An incomplete checkup exists for [date]. Resume where you left off, or start fresh?"
  • Doesn't exist: Continue to Step 3.
Step 3: Cross-Reference Context (Optional)

Before starting questions, briefly review available CEOS data for context:

  • Read data/vision.md for Core Values and 1-Year Plan (Vision context)
  • Read recent data/rocks/ for current quarter's Rocks (Traction context)
  • Read data/scorecard/metrics.md for active metrics (Data context)
  • Read data/issues/open/ for open issues count (Issues context)

Display a brief context summary:

Context for Today's Checkup
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Core Values: [list from vision.md]
Current Rocks: [count] for [quarter]
Active Metrics: [count] on Scorecard
Open Issues: [count]

If any data source is missing, note it and continue. The checkup doesn't require these — they provide context.

Step 4: Collect Ratings

Present the 20 questions organized by component. For each component:

  1. Display the component name and its questions
  2. For each participant, collect a rating (1-5) for each question
  3. Show running totals as you go

Collection approach: Present all questions for one component at a time. For each question, collect ratings from all participants before moving to the next question.

Example interaction:

VISION — Question 1 of 6
"We have a clear vision in writing that has been properly communicated
and is shared by everyone in the company."
Rate 1-5 (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree):
Brad: [rating]
Sarah: [rating]

After each component, display the component subtotal:

Vision Complete — Component Average: 4.2
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Brad avg: 4.3
Sarah avg: 4.0

Progress tracking: Show progress after each component:

Progress: 2/6 components [████████░░░░░░░░░░░░] 33%
Vision: 4.2 | People: 3.8 | Data: — | Issues: — | Process: — | Traction: —
Step 5: Calculate Scores

After all 20 questions are rated:

  1. Per-component scores: Average all ratings for that component's questions across all participants.
  2. Per-participant scores: Average all 20 ratings for each individual.
  3. Overall score: Average of all 20 questions across all participants.
Step 6: Identify Strengths and Opportunities
  • Strengths: Components scoring 4.0+ — these are working well.
  • Opportunities: Components scoring below 3.0 — these need immediate attention.
  • Attention needed: Components scoring 3.0-3.9 — monitor and improve.

If overall score < 2.5: Display warning: "Overall score below 2.5/5. Consider a focused IDS session to identify root causes across multiple components."

Step 7: Prompt for Action Items

For each component scoring below 3.5, ask: "Any specific action items for [Component]?"

Suggest relevant CEOS skills for low-scoring components:

ComponentScore < 3.0Suggested Skill
VisionLow"Consider running ceos-vto to refresh the Vision/Traction Organizer"
PeopleLow"Consider running ceos-people to evaluate right people, right seats"
DataLow"Consider reviewing ceos-scorecard to strengthen weekly metrics"
IssuesLow"Consider running ceos-ids to process the open issues list"
ProcessLow"Consider running ceos-process to document core processes"
TractionLow"Consider reviewing ceos-rocks for Rock focus and ceos-l10 for meeting discipline"
Step 8: Save the Checkup File

Build the file from templates/checkup.md:

  • Replace {{date}} with the session date
  • Replace {{participants}} with participant names
  • Fill in the ratings arrays in the frontmatter
  • Populate the component scores tables in the markdown body
  • Fill in strengths, opportunities, and action items
  • Set status: complete

Show the complete file before writing. Ask: "Save this checkup?"

Write to data/checkups/YYYY-MM-DD.md.


Mode: Review

Use when reviewing historical checkup results and tracking trends over time.

Step 1: Read All Checkups

Read all files from data/checkups/. Parse YAML frontmatter for each.

If no files exist: "No checkups found. Run your first Organizational Checkup to establish a baseline."

Sort by date (most recent first).

Step 2: Display Summary Table
Organizational Checkup History
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

This is the start of the file. Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

7-day trend score
0

Refreshed 18 Mar 2026, 7 months ago.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/bradfeld/ceos/ceos-checkup/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/bradfeld/ceos/ceos-checkup)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.