<< All versions

Skill v1.0.1

currentAutomated scan100/100
btspoony/mstar-harness/mstar-compound

+10 new

──Details
PublishedOctober 26, 2026 at 09:55 AM
Content Hashsha256:0eb68bebb3e4a451...
Git SHAc3daff7be4ca
Bump Typepatch
Compare with v1.0.0
──Files
Files (1 file, 9.8 KB)
SKILL.md9.8 KBactive
SKILL.md · 113 lines · 9.8 KB

version: "1.0.1" name: mstar-compound description: 知识结晶 (compound):把已解决的问题沉淀为 {KNOWLEDGE_DIR} 下的结构化知识文档,迭代收口时提升 specs/guides;双轨 Bug/Knowledge,含重叠与可发现性检查。无结晶时以 reasoned skipped 结束。


mstar-compound(知识结晶)

Load order

Read `mstar-harness-core` first. Path symbols ({KNOWLEDGE_DIR}, {HARNESS_DIR}) → `mstar-conventions`. On conflict, `mstar-harness-core` wins.

Purpose

After solving a non-trivial problem, mstar-compound captures the learning as a structured document in {KNOWLEDGE_DIR}, so future plan research, debugging, and implementation can find and reuse it.

In the mstar lifecycle, compound is invoked by lifecycle flows — the iteration-close round or a standalone-development delivery tail — sharing one step sequence (see「Integration with mstar lifecycle」). It is never triggered at per-plan Done, and stays invocable standalone for ad-hoc captures.

Knowledge that isn't captured evaporates when the session ends. Knowledge that is captured but not discoverable is equally lost. This skill addresses both.

产物存储位置

SSOT: mstar-conventions/references/artifact-storage-paths.md。本 skill 不重定义路径;知识文档 → {HARNESS_DIR}/knowledge/<category>/<slug>.md,CONCEPTS.md → <repo-root>/CONCEPTS.md。<category> 取值见 references/category-mapping.md。

是否值得结晶(自检门禁)

调用本 skill 前,PM(或触发方)必须对候选问题逐条自检 Q1–Q8(诊断耗时 / 非显而易见性 / 可复用性 / 项目特异性 / 既有重叠 / 架构影响 / 失败尝试价值 / 跨模块)。完整问题表、决策矩阵(Yes≥4 强烈建议;Yes=3 Lightweight;Yes≤2 跳过;Q5=Yes 高重叠不新建)与示例判定 → `references/compound-workflow.md`「是否值得结晶」。

快判:Q5 高重叠 → 更新已有文档,不新建;其余按决策矩阵 Yes 数。

Integration with mstar lifecycle

Compound 是被生命周期流程调用的知识结晶流程:本 SKILL 只拥有执行步骤(下方 + references/compound-workflow.md);触发时机、cwd、写入面与结果记录面由调用方流程声明。本 SKILL 不复述调用方细节,也不维护调用方清单 —— 调用方各自指向本技能的步骤文件。

iteration-start → [plan lifecycle × N] → iteration-close → mstar-compound → {KNOWLEDGE_DIR} → feeds next iteration's specify/plan。per-plan Done 不是触发点:迭代内 plan 行不各自运行(迭代整体收口时一次),独立交付 plan 走其交付尾段 disposition,不强制新文档(reasoned skipped 有效)。

Iteration package promotion(package 盘点方法)

调用方声明需要盘点迭代 package 时,compound 的盘点方法如下。

路径:{ITERATION_DIR}/<iteration-id>/**(含 guides/、specs/、扁平 .md;默认排除 delivery-compass.md 除非 PM 显式纳入。Legacy 根目录 *-delivery-compass.md 同理排除)。

步骤动作
1. Inventory列出 package 下全部 .md(除默认排除 compass);读各文件 + package README.md(若有)
2. Triage每篇:Promote / Keep snapshot / Skip(理由写入 compound 摘要)
3. Promote值得跨迭代复用 → 走 Q1–Q8(或轻量判定)→ Phase 2 重叠检测 → Phase 3–6 结构化重写进 {KNOWLEDGE_DIR}/(禁止无改写整文件复制)
4. Trace源文件顶栏或 package README:Promoted to: <knowledge-path>;provenance 记在 catalog 关系(mstar catalog link,关系取 derived-from),不在 README 表格加列
5. Summary记录本轮提升篇数、保留快照、跳过及原因(记录面由调用方承载)

Promote 典型:迭代 spec 已验证且指导未来实现;guide 含非显而易见过程知识或失败尝试。Keep snapshot:仅迭代史、已被 {SPECS_DIR}/ 取代的草案、或自检 ≤2 Yes 的琐碎笔记。边界 SSOT → `mstar-iteration/references/iteration-artifact-boundaries.md`。

When to use / Skip

Use:迭代收口(mstar-iteration § iteration-close)批量回顾;独立触发(非迭代或紧急,任何非平凡问题解决后);重大 bug 修复后(mstar-iteration 未启用时手动);独立 development plan 交付前的 disposition review(PR head 定稿前,见「Integration with mstar lifecycle」)。

Skip:自检 ≤2 Yes;Q5 高重叠(更新已有而非新建);纯机械工作(格式化、依赖升级、typo);问题未经验证。独立交付 plan 的 disposition 义务不因跳过结晶而消失——结晶跳过时以 reasoned skipped 记录结果(记录在 workflow,见「Integration with mstar lifecycle」)。

Two tracks

TrackWhat it capturesSection structure
BugIncident-level fix — "X broke, here's why and how we fixed it"Problem, Symptoms, What Didn't Work, Solution, Why This Works, Prevention
KnowledgeDurable guidance — "this is how we do X, and why"Context, Guidance, Why This Matters, When to Apply, Examples

Track 由 problem_type 决定,完整映射见 references/category-mapping.md。

Execution modes

ModeWhenBehavior
Full (default)Most casesDispatches research subagents for context analysis, solution extraction, overlap detection
LightweightSimple fixes, context-tight sessionsSingle-pass documentation, no subagents, faster

In Cursor, Full mode dispatches subagents via Task tool. PM selects mode.

Workflow skeleton(Phase 1–7)

完整步骤细节(Gather context / Overlap detection / Write document 含 frontmatter schema + path + validate / Discoverability check / CONCEPTS.md synergy / Catalog registration / Refresh trigger)→ `references/compound-workflow.md`。每 Phase 一个关键决策:

  1. Gather — 读对话史 + iteration package;分类 track/category(references/category-mapping.md)
  2. Overlap — 高重叠 → 更新已有(加 last_updated);中度 → 新建并标 consolidation review;低/无 → 正常新建
  3. Write — path + frontmatter(SSOT references/schema.yaml)+ body(assets/resolution-template.md)+ YAML validate
  4. Discoverability — 若 root AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md 未提 {KNOWLEDGE_DIR},提议最小补充(需用户同意;拒绝则仅跳过该编辑,doc 仍写)
  5. CONCEPTS.md — 项目特定领域词满足 qualifying bar 时提议入 CONCEPTS.md(规则见 references/concepts-vocabulary.md);全仓 bootstrap 归 mstar-compound-refresh
  6. Catalog — 新文档在 {HARNESS_DIR}/store.db 的 catalog 中登记为 kind=document(document_kind=knowledge):单行 mstar catalog register,或 reviewed mstar catalog discover + mstar catalog import;provenance/supersession 用 mstar catalog link(derived-from / supersedes 关系);生命周期变更用 mstar catalog update(active / archived / superseded;revision 守卫见 help)。不再要求 {KNOWLEDGE_DIR}/README.md 索引行(README 是散文,不是登记表)。知识关联载体是 catalog relations(mstar catalog link);snapshot plans[].metadata.knowledge_refs 仅 legacy 只读,不是写入面。每篇新 doc 必须完成本 Phase
  7. Refresh trigger — 新知识暗示旧 doc 过时 → 推荐 /pm compound-refresh <scope>(不自动跑,仅 flag)
Engine check (when available): run mstar compound validate <doc-path> [--knowledge-dir <dir>] (or import { validateSchemaYaml, assertKnowledgeCatalogCompleteness } from "@mstar-harness/engine" in a host hook) to validate the frontmatter against references/schema.yaml (Phase 3 Write) and assert that every knowledge body under {KNOWLEDGE_DIR} has a catalog row (Phase 6 Catalog, contract §4). The former README index-row assert is retired: the assertIndexRows export refuses actionably (compound.index.retired) instead of passing, and the mstar compound validate --knowledge-dir index-row check fails for the same reason. On fail -> do not proceed; fix and re-run. Skill text below remains authoritative when the runtime is absent.

Support files

读 references/compound-workflow.md(Q1–Q8 + Phase 1–7)、references/schema.yaml(frontmatter)、references/category-mapping.md(track/path 映射)、references/concepts-vocabulary.md(CONCEPTS.md 规则)、assets/resolution-template.md(track 正文结构)。

Skill dependencies

  • `mstar-conventions` — path symbols({KNOWLEDGE_DIR}、{HARNESS_DIR})
  • `mstar-artifacts` — store.db catalog 登记与生命周期(snapshot 为迁移源;project register 仅迁移历史)(README index maintenance retired)
  • `mstar-compound-refresh` — capture 后知识维护;CONCEPTS.md 全仓 bootstrap

NOT to do

  • Do not create a doc for trivial fixes (typos, formatting, dep bumps)
  • Do not write the doc before the solution is verified
  • Do not skip the overlap check — creating duplicates degrades the knowledge store
  • Do not edit AGENTS.md without user consent
  • Do not create CONCEPTS.md entries for general programming vocabulary
  • Do not modify product code — this skill writes documentation only

Evidence

正确结果 = 一篇可发现的结晶文档:{KNOWLEDGE_DIR}/<category>/<slug>.md 通过 references/schema.yaml frontmatter 校验(Phase 3 Write)+ catalog 登记为 kind=document(document_kind=knowledge,Phase 6 Catalog;mstar catalog list 可查到)+ 达标领域词入 CONCEPTS.md(Phase 5)+ 源文件 / package README 标注 Promoted to: <knowledge-path>(Phase 4 Trace)。

← v1.0.0All versions