bx33661/oh-my-vul/using-omv

Claude Code and agent skill by bx33661/oh-my-vul

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Bootstrap discipline for oh-my-vul research. Use at the start of any vulnerability research conversation, when the user asks to audit/find/report a package, dig for CVEs, or run omv skills — and before claiming a finding is confirmed, ready to submit, or “done”. Establishes mandatory process, hard gates, and evidence-before-claims rules. Prefer this over improvising a research workflow.

Install

npx vskill@latest install bx33661/oh-my-vul/using-omv

SKILL.md

using-omv

High-quality growth rule for this project: deepen discipline, do not inflate skill count.

This skill is the session bootstrap. Domain work still lives in the omv-find, omv-audit, omv-repro, and omv-report skills. You use those skills inside the process below — you do not invent parallel workflows.

Platform Invocation

Use the invocation form provided by the active agent:

PlatformProject managerFocused skill example
Pi/skill:omv/skill:omv-audit <id>
Codex$omv$omv-audit <id>
Claude Code/omv/omv-audit <id>

In the workflow below, /omv-* is shorthand for the matching focused skill on the active platform.

Iron Laws

text
1. EVIDENCE BEFORE CLAIMS
2. CLI TRUTH BEFORE PROSE
3. PROCESS BEFORE IMPROVISATION
4. PASSIVE RESEARCH ONLY

<HARD-GATE> Before any research claim or lifecycle transition, you must satisfy the matching gate. Rationalizing past a gate is a failure mode, not speed. </HARD-GATE>

When This Applies

Invoke before substantive research action if the user is:

  • looking for packages to audit, ranking targets, or running /omv-find
  • auditing source → sink → guard, or running /omv-audit
  • reproducing, reporting, disclosing, or asking “what next”
  • about to say a finding is confirmed, report-ready, non-duplicate, or complete

If you are a subagent doing one delegated slice (e.g. only CVSS math), stay in that slice and still refuse to invent evidence.

Default Research Pipeline

Use this order unless the user already has a later-stage artifact and explicitly continues from it:

text
1. Orient
omv dashboard OR /omv next
If no campaign and user has a target → omv start / campaign init
2. Open the problem (开题) — prefer Attack Surface Cards when a campaign exists
omv campaign surfaces propose <id>
omv campaign surfaces select <id> --cards <id,id>
omv campaign seed <id>
(If no surfaces file, seed uses generic lanes — still candidate-only.)
3. Deepen one hypothesis at a time
/omv-audit <id> → fill Evidence; never invent file:line
/omv-repro <id> → only when observed_result is the blocker
omv findings validate <id> after material edits
4. Gate before report language
omv review <id> --strict
Optional: /omv-critic <id>, /omv-dedup <id>
5. Report only when ready
/omv-report <id> only if review says ready (or user overrides with explicit draft-only ask)
Then provenance / archive only if user wants lifecycle bookkeeping

Announce briefly when you switch stages, e.g. “Using attack-surface cards to open the campaign” or “Running omv review --strict before any submit language.”

Hard Gates (non-negotiable)

Claim or actionRequired evidence (fresh in this turn when possible)
Start multi-hypothesis audit on a targetCampaign exists; prefer surfaces propose/select before bulk seed
status: confirmedomv findings validate <id> OK; source/sink/guard with concrete refs; submission score ≥ 75; no unresolved blockers
“Exploit works” / exploitability: provenLocal observed_result not unknown, or user-supplied observation recorded into Evidence
“Ready to submit” / submission-ready reportomv review <id> --strict → ready (or user explicitly asks for draft-only triage)
“Not a duplicate”Dedup fields filled from real searches; if offline, say not searched — never invent CVE IDs
“Done” / “fixed research complete”State remaining unknowns; do not imply CNA acceptance
Forbidden shortcuts
  • Do not write submission-ready VulDB/GHSA/OSV prose for blocked or low-score candidate findings.
  • Do not treat sink presence alone as a vulnerability.
  • Do not attack live third-party services or auto-run exploit payloads.
  • Do not create ThreatMap/Verification/report artifacts as fake proof during seed.
  • Do not skip CLI validation by “manually eyeballing” YAML when omv is available.

Red Flags (stop and correct)

ThoughtReality
“This is obviously vulnerable”Without source→sink→guard + version, it is a hypothesis
“I’ll confirm first and fill evidence later”Confirm is a gate, not a vibe
“Review is optional for a draft”Drafts must be labeled triage; never “ready to submit”
“Duplicate search will slow us down”Missing dedup is a common CNA rejection
“One more skill will fix this”Prefer stronger gates and better evidence; avoid skill sprawl
“The model said high confidence”Confidence without file:line is still low for omv
“Surfaces/cards are overkill”Cards are how we open problems; lanes alone are the thin path

Skill Priority

When multiple omv skills apply:

  1. Process — this skill (using-omv), /omv next, campaign/surfaces
  2. Depth — find → audit → repro
  3. Gate — review / critic / dedup
  4. Output — report / disclose

Do not jump to report because the user said “CVE” if Evidence is incomplete — run the gate and show the gap.

Quality Over Sprawl

Prefer:

  • tighter HARD-GATEs and CLI checks
  • better Attack Surface catalog and Evidence fields
  • adversarial verification when stakes are high

Avoid:

  • new /omv-* skills for every idea
  • parallel prose workflows that bypass .omv/
  • automating confirmation without observation

Minimal CLI Cheatsheet

bash
omv dashboard
omv start --target <name> --ecosystem <eco> --vuln <classes> --no-interactive
omv campaign surfaces propose <id>
omv campaign surfaces select <id> --cards <id,id>
omv campaign seed <id>
omv findings validate <id>
omv review <id> --strict

If omv is missing: install it with npm install --global oh-my-vul. Pi already manages the Skills installed by pi install npm:oh-my-vul, so Pi users should continue with omv version or omv start and must not run omv setup. In Codex or Claude Code, run the matching omv setup --platform codex|claude-code command and re-check with omv doctor --platform ....

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
4
7-day trend score
8

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/bx33661/oh-my-vul/using-omv/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/bx33661/oh-my-vul/using-omv)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.