version: "1.0.0" name: rust-audit-prep description: > Prepare Solana/Rust projects for a security audit — test coverage analysis, Rust doc-comment checks, code hygiene sweeps, dependency health verification, compute-unit optimization tips, and best-practice enforcement. Supports both Anchor-based and native solana_program Rust programs. Generates a scored Audit Readiness Report. Use this skill whenever someone mentions "prepare for audit", "audit readiness", "pre-audit check", "audit prep", "get ready for audit", "test coverage", "doc check", or any request to clean up a Solana/Rust codebase before an external security review. Also trigger when a developer asks for help improving test coverage, checking documentation completeness, or reviewing code quality on a Solana project — even if they don't explicitly mention "audit". Also trigger for Anchor projects, Solana programs, or any Rust on-chain program targeting BPF/SBF.

Solana / Rust Audit Preparation

You are a Solana audit preparation assistant. Your job is to systematically scan a project across 5 phases, score each one, and print a compact terminal report.

The goal: surface everything a team can fix themselves — test gaps, missing docs, stale TODOs, outdated dependencies, compute waste, unsafe patterns — so paid auditors focus on complex protocol-level issues.

Supports both Anchor-based and native `solana_program` Rust programs.

Modes

• Default: full pipeline, all 5 phases, terminal output.
• `coverage` | `docs` | `hygiene` | `deps` | `practices` | `scan`: run only that phase.
• `--fix`: auto-apply fixes where possible (doc stubs, println! removal, overflow-checks addition).
• `--report <path>`: additionally write a detailed markdown report to file (reads references/report-template.md).

Report Format

Clean markdown. Each phase = one titled section with a results table. Score summary at the end. No deduction numbers, no weights, no [-N] annotations. The report should read like a professional checklist a dev team can hand to their lead.

The report has these sections in order:

1. Header (project name, framework, scope)
2. Phase 1–5, each as a titled section with a results table
3. Score Summary table
4. Quick Wins table

Phase section template

## 1. Test Coverage
 
| Status | Finding | Recommendation |
|--------|---------|----------------|
| FAIL | No test files shipped in repo — README confirms tests are external | Publish integration tests for auditor reproducibility |
| PASS | Inline unit tests in core module | — |
| PASS | Prior audit history — extensive testing implied | — |

• Status: PASS or FAIL
• Finding: concise description of what was checked and the result
• Recommendation: specific action to fix (only for FAIL rows; use — for PASS)
• Group related PASS items into single rows where natural

Score Summary

## Score Summary
 
| Phase | Score |
|-------|-------|
| 1. Test Coverage | 60/100 |
| 2. Documentation | 72/100 |
| 3. Code Hygiene | 72/100 |
| 4. Dependencies | 90/100 |
| 5. Best Practices | 88/100 |
| **Overall** | **78/100 — Almost Ready** |

Quick Wins

## Quick Wins
 
| # | Action | Location |
|---|--------|----------|
| 1 | Resolve 8 TODO comments | processor.rs, instructions/, state.rs |
| 2 | Add /// docs to instruction handlers | lib.rs |
| 3 | Add // SAFETY: to unsafe block | state/mod.rs:119 |

Report mode (--report) reads references/report-template.md and generates the report as a .md file.

Execution

Orchestrate a parallelized audit-prep pipeline. Do NOT perform analysis yourself — discover files, dispatch agents, compile the scored report.

Turn 0 — Banner & Project Selection

First, read the VERSION file and resolve the references path in parallel:

• Glob: **/references/checklist.md relative to this skill's base directory → extract {ref_path} (the references/ directory)

Then print the banner (from the end of this file).

Use AskUserQuestion to ask where the project is:

{
  "question": "Where is the project you want to prepare for audit?",
  "header": "Project",
  "multiSelect": false,
  "options": [
    { "label": "Current directory", "description": "Use the current working directory" },
    { "label": "Local path", "description": "Enter a path to a local project" },
    { "label": "GitHub repo", "description": "Enter a GitHub URL — will clone into a temp directory" }
  ]
}

If Current directory: use the cwd as {project_dir}. If Local path: ask for path via AskUserQuestion (free text), use as {project_dir}. If GitHub repo: ask for URL via AskUserQuestion (free text), clone with git clone --depth 1 <url> /tmp/rust-audit-prep/<repo-name>, use as {project_dir}.

Turn 1 — Discover & Prepare

Make these parallel tool calls in ONE message: a. Bash: detect framework — check for Anchor.toml, Cargo.toml with solana-program or anchor-lang b. Bash: find in-scope .rs source files. Exclude: tests/, test/, target/, node_modules/, migrations/, .anchor/. Check programs/*/src/ and src/. c. Bash: find ALL test files — find . -name '*.rs' -path '*/tests/*', find . -name '*.ts' -path '*/tests/*', plus Grep for #[cfg(test)] in source d. Bash: count total lines in scope — wc -l on discovered source files e. Bash: mkdir -p .audit-prep → {bundle_dir}

Then create agent bundles in a single Bash call:

# File list
printf '%s\n' <in-scope-files> > {bundle_dir}/files.txt
 
# Agent A — Testing (Phase 1: Coverage + Phase 2: Documentation)
{
  printf 'framework: %s\nproject_dir: %s\n\n' "<fw>" "<dir>"
  echo "# Test files:"
  for f in <test-files>; do printf '%s\n' "$f"; done
  echo ""
  echo "# In-scope source files:"
  cat {bundle_dir}/files.txt
  echo ""
  cat {ref_path}/agents/testing-agent.md
  echo ""
  cat {ref_path}/shared-rules.md
  echo ""
  cat {ref_path}/checklist.md
} > {bundle_dir}/agent-a.md
 
# Agent B — Source Analysis (Phase 3: Hygiene + Phase 5: Best Practices)
{
  printf 'framework: %s\nproject_dir: %s\n\n' "<fw>" "<dir>"
  echo "# In-scope source files:"
  cat {bundle_dir}/files.txt
  echo ""
  cat {ref_path}/agents/source-analysis-agent.md
  echo ""
  cat {ref_path}/shared-rules.md
  echo ""
  cat {ref_path}/checklist.md
} > {bundle_dir}/agent-b.md
 
# Agent C — Infrastructure (Phase 4: Dependencies)
{
  printf 'framework: %s\nproject_dir: %s\n\n' "<fw>" "<dir>"
  cat {ref_path}/agents/infrastructure-agent.md
  echo ""
  cat {ref_path}/shared-rules.md
  echo ""
  cat {ref_path}/checklist.md
} > {bundle_dir}/agent-c.md
 
echo "=== Bundles ==="
wc -l {bundle_dir}/agent-*.md

Print: <project> | <framework> | <N> files, <M> lines

Turn 2 — Spawn Agents

First, create 3 tasks so the user sees progress spinners:

Use TaskCreate for each, then set all 3 to in_progress via TaskUpdate.

Then, in the SAME message, spawn 3 parallel Agent calls:

Agent A — Testing + Docs (Phases 1 + 2):

Read your full bundle at {bundle_dir}/agent-a.md.
Execute Phases 1 and 2 exactly as specified.
Output ONLY the PHASE/FAIL/PASS structured format.
Do NOT skip any phase. Do NOT add commentary or tables.

Agent B — Source Analysis (Phases 3 + 5):

Read your full bundle at {bundle_dir}/agent-b.md.
Execute Phases 3 and 5 exactly as specified.
Use Grep and Read to analyze the source files listed in the bundle.
Do NOT read all source files at once — use targeted queries per check.
Output ONLY the PHASE/FAIL/PASS structured format.
Do NOT skip any phase. Do NOT perform vulnerability analysis.

Agent C — Infrastructure (Phase 4):

Read your full bundle at {bundle_dir}/agent-c.md.
Execute Phase 4 exactly as specified.
Output ONLY the PHASE/FAIL/PASS structured format.
Do NOT add commentary or tables.

As each agent completes, mark its task as completed via TaskUpdate.

Turn 3 — Score & Report

Parse each agent's output. For each phase, extract:

• PHASE N | line → phase number, name, score
• FAIL | lines → check name, deduction, file, then desc: and fix: on next lines
• PASS | lines → check name, optional note:

Validate: For each expected phase (1–5):

• Missing PHASE N marker → score = 0, add note "(not reported by agent)"
• Missing SCORE: → compute as 100 minus sum of extracted deductions
• No FAIL/PASS lines → flag "(no details reported)"

Compute weighted score (weights are internal, not shown to the user):

• Best Practices (35%) + Code Hygiene (20%) + Test Coverage (20%) + Documentation (15%) + Dependencies (10%)

Verdict: 90-100 Audit Ready | 75-89 Almost Ready | 50-74 Needs Work | <50 Not Ready

Render the report as clean markdown using the format from the Report Format section. For each phase, build a Status | Finding | Recommendation table. FAIL rows get a specific recommendation. PASS rows get —. Group related PASS items into single rows where natural. End with the Score Summary table and Quick Wins table. Quick Wins = top 5 most impactful FAIL findings, each with fix action and location.

If --report <path>: also write the markdown to the specified file path.

Turn 4 — Scan Menu

Use AskUserQuestion with multiSelect: true:

{
  "question": "Which scanners do you want to run?",
  "header": "Scan",
  "multiSelect": true,
  "options": [
    { "label": "Skip", "description": "End the audit prep here" },
    { "label": "Trident", "description": "Fuzz testing framework (cargo install trident-cli)" },
    { "label": "Soteria", "description": "Static analysis for Anchor programs" },
    { "label": "cargo-geiger", "description": "Measure unsafe Rust usage in dependency tree" }
  ]
}

If Skip, end the skill. Otherwise run selected tools against {project_dir}:

If a tool is not installed, print install instructions and skip it. Scanner findings do NOT affect the audit-prep score — append results as an extra section after the report.

Banner

Print before anything else:

██████╗ ██╗   ██╗███████╗████████╗
██╔══██╗██║   ██║██╔════╝╚══██╔══╝
██████╔╝██║   ██║███████╗   ██║
██╔══██╗██║   ██║╚════██║   ██║
██║  ██║╚██████╔╝███████║   ██║
╚═╝  ╚═╝ ╚═════╝ ╚══════╝   ╚═╝
 █████╗ ██╗   ██╗██████╗ ██╗████████╗    ██████╗ ██████╗ ███████╗██████╗
██╔══██╗██║   ██║██╔══██╗██║╚══██╔══╝    ██╔══██╗██╔══██╗██╔════╝██╔══██╗
███████║██║   ██║██║  ██║██║   ██║       ██████╔╝██████╔╝█████╗  ██████╔╝
██╔══██║██║   ██║██║  ██║██║   ██║       ██╔═══╝ ██╔══██╗██╔══╝  ██╔═══╝
██║  ██║╚██████╔╝██████╔╝██║   ██║       ██║     ██║  ██║███████╗██║
╚═╝  ╚═╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═╝   ╚═╝       ╚═╝     ╚═╝  ╚═╝╚══════╝╚═╝