version: "1.0.0" name: git-workflow description: Reach for this before a commit, a branch, a revert or a history question — a repository to initialise, a working tree to cut into atomic commits, a staged diff to scan for credentials. Never merges, never commits to main. The pull request body is pull-request; per-slice isolation worktree; grading a diff code-review.

Git Workflow and Versioning

Purpose

Stage: cross-cutting. Principles 1, 7, 9.

The save-point substrate every other stage commits through: a repository to initialise, a working tree cut into atomic commits, a staged diff scanned for credentials before any of it becomes history. It writes no artifact-chain file of its own. History is the one account of a change that outlives the conversation that produced it.

When to use / when to skip

• Any commit, branch, revert or history question: every code change lands through git, and the only

pass with nothing to do is one where no file changed.

• A directory that is not a repository yet; a failure mid-slice asking which save point to return to or

which commit turned a test red; a tree of unrelated edits that has to become reviewable history.

• Near-miss — the pull request body and its risk band: pull-request. Per-slice isolation: worktree.

Grading a diff: code-review. The release after a merge: shipping-and-launch. Server-side gates: ci-cd.

• Not here: merging. A person merges (`safety-rails.md`).

Inputs

• the working tree (git status, git diff --staged) — helps: what every step below reads ·

without it: the directory is no repository — git init first and mark the baseline derived, rather than commit into a non-repo.

• `docs/features/<slug>/plan/<slice-id>.md` and `STATE.md` — helps: the slice id the branch carries and the why its

messages state · without them: take both from the prompt and the diff, marked derived.

• the repository's conventions (recent git log, .gitignore, the hooks there) — helps: match the

house style rather than impose one · without them: use the shapes below, marked derived.

With a person present, ask at most three questions, only where the gap changes the history's shape.

Core Principles

1. Commit each green increment as its own save point — one logical, self-contained change, roughly

100 lines, its test in the same commit or already committed earlier on the branch, which is what keeps the test-first order legible in the history.

1. Keep concerns apart. A reflow, a refactor and a behaviour change are three commits — stage per

commit by path, and git add -p where a reflow and a behaviour change share a file. Split anything past ~1,000 lines before review (code-review has the strategies).

1. Give the message the why, since the diff carries the what: <type>: <summary> — feat fix

refactor test docs chore — plus a body stating the reason, since the log is what reconstructs a decision or a changed oracle when the session log is thin, and what git log -S searches.

1. Rewrite no pushed history — no amend, rebase or force-push on a branch anyone else may hold.

Nothing is frozen: a test the plan moved past may change, disclosed in the pull request body and the log (pull-request), never folded quietly into a rewritten commit.

1. Hand over on a clean tree — every increment committed, nothing staged or stray — with the change

summary Outputs & handoff shapes.

Branching Strategy

Branch before the first commit and commit to main never: the run ends at an open pull request (`safety-rails.md`), and the default branch stays deployable. Name it feat/<slug> · fix/<slug> · refactor/<slug> · chore/<slug>, lowercase and hyphenated, a slice branch carrying its id (feat/OFD-2-draft-buffer). Merge inside a couple of days and delete it after — a branch outliving the week compounds merge risk daily, and unfinished work belongs behind an off-by-default flag. Two agents at once take a worktree each, one branch per directory (worktree).

The Save Point Pattern

On a failing test or a broken build, reset to the last green commit and diagnose from there rather than build on top of it (debugging-and-error-recovery) — git reset --hard HEAD then costs one increment. That holds only where each save point left a clean tree, so nothing a neighbouring slice owns rides on the reset.

Pre-Commit Hygiene

Run the pass every time, in order — read the staged diff, scan it for a credential, then tests, lint, type check:

git diff --staged
git diff --staged | grep -inE 'password|secret|api[_-]?key|token|BEGIN [A-Z ]*PRIVATE KEY|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}'

A hit is a stop-list item (`safety-rails.md`): the commit does not happen, and the report says a credential is present without echoing its value. Move the pass into a hook (lint-staged + husky, or .git/hooks/pre-commit) so it runs whether anyone remembers or not; ci-cd owns the same gates server-side.

Handling Generated Files

Write the .gitignore before the first commit — build output, .env*, node_modules/, keys, private editor state; afterwards the remedy is a rotation, not a revert. Commit a generated file only where the project expects one: a lockfile, a migration.

Using Git for Debugging

git bisect for the commit that turned a test red, git log -S or --grep for when a line arrived, git blame for what carried it. A root-caused defect cites its commit in docs/lessons.md (debugging-and-error-recovery).

Rationalizations

• "I'll commit once the feature is done" → one commit for an afternoon is one nobody can bisect or revert.
• "The message doesn't matter, the diff is there" → the diff carries the what; later the why exists

only in the message.

• "It's really all one change" → a reflow and a behaviour change in one diff hide each other.
• "I'll squash and force-push to tidy it up" → a rewrite of pushed history hides a changed test from

the review reading the diff.

• "It's only a dev token" → history keeps a credential long after the file holding it is deleted.
• "I'll add the .gitignore later" → between now and then is where .env and dist/ enter history.

Red flags

• A working tree carrying an afternoon of unrelated edits, uncommitted.
• Subjects reading wip, updates, fix stuff, misc.
• A reflow sitting in the same commit as a behaviour change.
• .env, dist/ or node_modules/ staged, or a repository with no .gitignore.
• A branch alive for weeks, or a commit landing on main itself.
• An amend, rebase or force-push proposed on a branch already pushed.

Verification

• [ ] The work sits on a named branch off the default one, main neither committed to nor pushed.
• [ ] One logical change per commit, each with its test, and git status --porcelain is empty.
• [ ] Every message carries a type and its why; no commit mixes a reflow with behaviour.
• [ ] The staged-diff scan ran clean before each commit — or a hit ended the pass as a stop-list item,

naming where the credential was and printing no value.

• [ ] The .gitignore was in place before the first commit.
• [ ] The change summary came back, naming what was left alone on purpose.
• [ ] Every derived value — slice id, base branch, initialised repository — reads derived.

Outputs & handoff

• Commits on the feature or slice branch, shaped as Core Principles states — the range

pull-request bands and code-review grades.

• `.gitignore` at the repository root when there is none, covering what Handling Generated Files lists.
• `docs/session-log.md` — one appended entry, cap 60 words, where this pass settled something

itself: an initialised repository, a chosen base branch, a split nobody asked for. Shape in `state-schema.md`.

• No `STATE.md` row — the caller owns the slice's transition

(`state-schema.md`).

• Returned in conversation rather than written — the change summary, cap 200 words:

`` CHANGES MADE <file>: what changed there NOT TOUCHED <file or area>: why it was left alone, deliberately CONCERNS what a reviewer should look at first, or "none" ``

NOT TOUCHED is the block that earns its keep — where an unsolicited renovation would have shown.

• Nothing else — no merge, no pull request, no qa.md, no release.

Report each capped write — the change summary, the log entry — at its measured size against its cap; an over-cap draft is reported at that size, never handed on as though it fit.