daffy0208/ai-dev-standards/customer-feedback-analyzer

// Contextual feedback
<FeedbackWidget
  context={{
    page: 'dashboard',
    feature: 'export',
    user_action: 'clicked_export'
  }}
  placeholder="How can we improve exports?"
/>

Question: "How likely are you to recommend [Product] to a friend or colleague?"
Scale: 0-10
 
Scoring:
  Promoters (9-10): Love your product, will advocate
  Passives (7-8): Satisfied but not enthusiastic
  Detractors (0-6): Unhappy, will churn
 
NPS = % Promoters - % Detractors
 
Benchmarks:
  Excellent: ≥50
  Good: 30-49
  Needs Work: <30

Pattern Recognition:
  - Same issue reported 5+ times → UX problem, not edge case
  - Support time > 10 min per ticket → Needs better docs
  - Ticket volume spike → Recent deploy likely caused issue

Interview Structure:
  1. Background (5 min): Their role, use case
  2. Problem Discovery (10 min): Challenges they face
  3. Solution Validation (10 min): Show prototype, get reaction
  4. Wrap-up (5 min): Any other feedback?
 
Sample Size: 5-10 users per persona

Benefits:
  - See most requested features
  - Reduce duplicate requests
  - Public roadmap transparency
  - Close the loop automatically
 
Avoid:
  - Building everything requested
  - Letting voters drive strategy

Key Questions:
  - What made you decide to cancel?
  - What feature/change would have kept you?
  - What are you switching to?
  - What did we do well?

Bug: Something broken
  - "Export fails with >100 rows"
  - Priority: Fix immediately
 
Feature Request: New capability
  - "Add Slack integration"
  - Priority: Vote/validate
 
Enhancement: Improve existing feature
  - "Export should include timestamps"
  - Priority: Nice to have
 
Usability: Confusing UX
  - "Can't find where to invite team members"
  - Priority: High (friction)
 
Performance: Speed issue
  - "Dashboard loads slowly"
  - Priority: Depends on impact

Critical: Blocks core workflow
  - "Can't save projects"
  - Action: Hotfix immediately
 
High: Significant friction
  - "Onboarding confusing"
  - Action: Fix this sprint
 
Medium: Minor annoyance
  - "Button text unclear"
  - Action: Fix next quarter
 
Low: Edge case or cosmetic
  - "Spacing looks off on mobile"
  - Action: Backlog

Widespread: 50+ reports
  → High priority
 
Common: 10-50 reports
  → Medium priority
 
Occasional: 5-10 reports
  → Low priority, monitor
 
Rare: <5 reports
  → Likely edge case, document workaround

Power Users: High engagement, experienced
  → Actionable, technical feedback
 
New Users: Recently signed up
  → Onboarding issues, first impressions
 
Churned Users: Cancelled/inactive
  → Why did they leave?
 
Enterprise: Paying customers
  → Security, compliance, integrations

Score = Impact (1-5) × Frequency (1-5) × Strategic Alignment (1-5)
 
Score ≥ 40: High Priority (next sprint)
Score 20-39: Medium Priority (next quarter)
Score < 20: Low Priority (backlog or never)

Feedback: "Add Slack integration"
  Impact: 4 (significantly improves collaboration)
  Frequency: 5 (50+ requests)
  Strategic Alignment: 4 (fits roadmap)
  Score: 4 × 5 × 4 = 80
 
  Decision: HIGH PRIORITY - Build next sprint
 
Feedback: "Change button color"
  Impact: 1 (minor cosmetic)
  Frequency: 1 (1 person mentioned)
  Strategic Alignment: 1 (not strategic)
  Score: 1 × 1 × 1 = 1
 
  Decision: LOW PRIORITY - Backlog

Email Template:
 
Subject: Thanks for your feedback!
 
Hi [Name],
 
Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts on [topic].
 
We review all feedback and use it to prioritize our roadmap. I've shared
your input with the product team.
 
You can track feature requests on our public roadmap: [link]
 
Thanks for helping us improve!
[Your Name]

Decision Tree: Is it reported 10+ times?
  Yes → Add to roadmap
  No → Monitor
 
  Does it align with strategy?
  Yes → Prioritize
  No → Document why not
 
  Can we ship in 2 weeks?
  Yes → Quick win, do it
  No → Add to backlog

Email Template:
 
Subject: You asked for [Feature] - it's live!
 
Hi [Name],
 
Remember when you asked us to add [feature]? Good news - it's live!
 
[Screenshot/GIF of feature]
 
Here's how it works:
 
1.[Step 1]
2.[Step 2]
 
Try it now: [Link]
 
Thanks for the feedback that made this happen.
[Your Name]
 
P.S. Have more ideas? Reply to this email.

## [Feature] is now live!
 
Requested by 47 users, [Feature] lets you [benefit].
 
How it works:
 
-[Key point 1]
-[Key point 2]
 
Try it: [Link]
Thanks to everyone who suggested this!

Problem: Vocal minority ≠ Real need
 
Example:
  - 1 user emails daily about dark mode
  - Analytics show 2% use dark mode
 
Action: Validate with data before building

Problem: Users leave without complaining
 
Example:
  - Retention drops from 40% to 30%
  - No feedback, no complaints
 
Action:
  - Proactive exit interviews
  - Check analytics for drop-off points
  - Run usability tests

Problem: Building everything requested leads to bloat
 
Example:
  - 'Add Excel export'
  - 'Add CSV export'
  - 'Add JSON export'
  - 'Add PDF export'
 
Action: Build generic solution, not every variant

feedback_summary:
  period: "2024-01-15 to 2024-01-22"
  total_items: 87
 
  top_themes:
    - theme: "Slack Integration"
      frequency: 23
      severity: high
      example_quotes:
        - "We need Slack notifications"
        - "Can't notify team without Slack"
      recommended_action: "Build Slack integration next sprint"
 
    - theme: "Slow Dashboard Load"
      frequency: 15
      severity: medium
      example_quotes:
        - "Dashboard takes 10+ seconds"
        - "Performance is terrible"
      recommended_action: "Optimize queries, add caching"
 
    - theme: "Mobile App Request"
      frequency: 8
      severity: low
      example_quotes:
        - "I want a mobile app"
      recommended_action: "Monitor, not enough demand yet"
 
  nps:
    score: 42
    detractor_reasons:
      - "Too expensive" (12 mentions)
      - "Missing features" (8 mentions)
      - "Slow performance" (5 mentions)
 
  prioritized_backlog:
    - feedback: "Add Slack integration"
      score: 80
      priority: high
 
    - feedback: "Optimize dashboard performance"
      score: 45
      priority: medium
 
    - feedback: "Mobile app"
      score: 16
      priority: low

Feedback Collection:
  - In-app: Canny, UserVoice, Intercom
  - Surveys: Typeform, SurveyMonkey, Delighted (NPS)
  - User Research: Calendly, Zoom, UserTesting.com
 
Analysis:
  - Qualitative: Dovetail, Notion, Airtable
  - Quantitative: Excel, Google Sheets, Tableau
  - Sentiment: MonkeyLearn, Lexalytics
 
Roadmap Transparency:
  - Public Roadmap: Canny, ProductBoard, Trello
  - Changelog: Headway, ReleaseNotes.io, Beamer

Daily:
  - Review support tickets
  - Monitor in-app feedback
 
Weekly:
  - Synthesize themes
  - Share with product team
  - Prioritize top requests
 
Monthly:
  - Send NPS survey
  - Review feature requests
  - Update public roadmap
 
Quarterly:
  - User interviews (5-10)
  - Exit surveys for churned users
  - Competitive feedback analysis