developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/debugging-methodology
Claude Code and agent skill by developersglobal/ai-agent-skills
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Systematic root cause analysis for production and development bugs. Hypothesis-driven debugging — never guess-and-check.
Install
npx vskill@latest install developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/debugging-methodologySKILL.md
Overview
Random code changes in response to errors are not debugging — they're noise generation. This skill enforces a systematic, hypothesis-driven approach: understand the problem, form a hypothesis, test it, confirm the root cause, then fix.
AI agents often cycle through random fixes until something "works." This skill prevents that.
When to Use
- Any time a test fails unexpectedly
- Any time you encounter an error or exception
- When behavior differs between environments
- When performance degrades unexpectedly
Process
Step 1: Reproduce Reliably
- Before doing anything else: reproduce the bug reliably. If you can't reproduce it, you can't fix it.
- Write a failing test that captures the bug — this becomes your regression test.
- Note the exact conditions that trigger the bug: inputs, environment, sequence of actions.
Verify: You can trigger the bug on demand.
Step 2: Understand Before Diagnosing
- Read the full error message — not just the first line.
- Read the stack trace from bottom to top — the root cause is usually near the bottom.
- Identify: What was the program trying to do? What happened instead?
Verify: You can explain the bug in one sentence without using the word "error."
Step 3: Form a Hypothesis
- Based on what you know, form a specific hypothesis: "I think the bug is X because Y."
- The hypothesis must be falsifiable — you can design a test that proves or disproves it.
- Do not start making code changes until you have a hypothesis.
Verify: Your hypothesis is specific enough to design a test for.
Step 4: Test the Hypothesis
- Add targeted logging or a targeted test that confirms or refutes the hypothesis.
- Run it. Read the output carefully.
- If the hypothesis is wrong: update your understanding, form a new hypothesis, repeat.
- If the hypothesis is right: you've found the root cause.
Verify: Root cause is confirmed by evidence, not assumed.
Step 5: Fix the Root Cause (Not the Symptom)
- Fix the root cause — not the symptom. Suppressing an error message is not a fix.
- Make the minimum change that fixes the root cause.
- Run the failing test you wrote in Step 1 — it should now pass.
- Run the full test suite — no regressions.
Verify: The specific failing test now passes. Full suite still passes.
Step 6: Prevent Recurrence
- If the bug wasn't caught by existing tests: add a test that would have caught it.
- If the bug was caused by a bad assumption: document the assumption or add a guard.
- Consider: does this class of bug exist elsewhere in the codebase?
Common Rationalizations (and Rebuttals)
| Excuse | Rebuttal | |
|---|---|---|
| "Let me just try this and see" | Random changes produce random results. Form a hypothesis first. | |
| "It must be a framework bug" | It's almost never the framework. Prove it before blaming it. | |
| "Works on my machine" | Environment differences are root causes. Find them. Don't dismiss them. | |
| "I'll add a try/catch" | That hides the bug. Find and fix the root cause. |
Red Flags
- Making code changes before understanding the bug
- Adding try/catch to silence errors without investigating root cause
- "I'll try this and see if it helps"
- Assuming the bug is in a dependency before proving it
- Fixing the symptom (error message) rather than the cause
Verification
- [ ] Bug reproducible on demand
- [ ] Root cause identified (not just symptom)
- [ ] Fix targets root cause, not symptom
- [ ] Reproduction test written and now passes
- [ ] Full test suite passes with no regressions
- [ ] Regression test added to prevent future occurrence
References
Security
- Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/debugging-methodology/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 64
- Repository forks
- 10
- 7-day trend score
- 21
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/debugging-methodology)