<< All versions
Skill v1.0.1
currentAutomated scandianel555/dskills/sequential-think
1 files
──Details
PublishedMay 24, 2026 at 08:13 PM
Content Hashsha256:c23214e8150c45f8...
Git SHA2e0f4a62d137
Bump Typepatch
──Files
Files (1 file, 5.9 KB)
SKILL.md5.9 KBactive
SKILL.md · 196 lines · 5.9 KB
version: "1.0.1" name: sequential-think description: | Multi-step reasoning engine for complex analysis and systematic problem solving. Use when: (1) Complex debugging scenarios with multiple layers, (2) Architectural analysis and system design, (3) Problems requiring hypothesis testing and validation, (4) Multi-component failure investigation, (5) Performance bottleneck identification. Triggers: "--think", "--think-hard", "--ultrathink", "analyze step by step", "break down this problem", "systematic analysis". IMPORTANT: Do NOT use for simple single-step tasks.
Sequential Think
Structured iterative thinking for complex problem-solving. Standalone CLI only (no MCP dependency).
Execution Methods
Run scripts/sequential_think_cli.py via Bash:
bash
# Process a thoughtpython scripts/sequential_think_cli.py think \--thought "First, let me analyze the problem structure..." \--thought-number 1 \--total-thoughts 5# Continue thinking chainpython scripts/sequential_think_cli.py think \--thought "Based on step 1, I hypothesize that..." \--thought-number 2 \--total-thoughts 5# Revise a previous thoughtpython scripts/sequential_think_cli.py think \--thought "Reconsidering step 1, I realize..." \--thought-number 3 \--total-thoughts 5 \--is-revision \--revises-thought 1# Branch into alternative pathpython scripts/sequential_think_cli.py think \--thought "Alternative approach: what if we..." \--thought-number 4 \--total-thoughts 6 \--branch-from 2 \--branch-id "alt-approach"# Final thought (complete chain)python scripts/sequential_think_cli.py think \--thought "Conclusion: the solution is..." \--thought-number 5 \--total-thoughts 5 \--no-next# View thought historypython scripts/sequential_think_cli.py history [--format json|text]# Clear thought historypython scripts/sequential_think_cli.py clear
Core Principles
Iterative Thinking Process
- Each tool call = one "thought" in the chain
- Build upon, question, or revise previous thoughts
- Express uncertainty when it exists
Dynamic Thought Count
- Start with initial estimate of
totalThoughts - Adjust up/down as understanding evolves
- Add more thoughts even after reaching initial end
Hypothesis-Driven Approach
- Generate hypotheses as potential solutions emerge
- Verify hypotheses based on chain-of-thought steps
- Repeat until satisfied with solution
Completion Criteria
- Only set
nextThoughtNeeded: falsewhen truly finished - Must have satisfactory, verified answer
- Don't rush to conclusion
When to Use
| Scenario | Use Sequential Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Complex debugging (3+ layers) | ✅ Yes | |
| Architectural analysis | ✅ Yes | |
| Multi-component investigation | ✅ Yes | |
| Performance bottleneck analysis | ✅ Yes | |
| Root cause analysis | ✅ Yes | |
| Simple explanation | ❌ No | |
| Single-file change | ❌ No | |
| Straightforward fix | ❌ No |
Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
thought | string | Yes | Current thinking step content | |
thoughtNumber | int | Yes | Current position in sequence (1-based) | |
totalThoughts | int | Yes | Estimated total thoughts needed | |
nextThoughtNeeded | bool | No | Whether more thinking needed (default: true) | |
isRevision | bool | No | Whether this revises previous thinking | |
revisesThought | int | No | Which thought number is being reconsidered | |
branchFromThought | int | No | Branching point thought number | |
branchId | string | No | Identifier for current branch | |
needsMoreThoughts | bool | No | Signal that more thoughts needed beyond estimate |
Output Format
json
{"thoughtNumber": 3,"totalThoughts": 5,"nextThoughtNeeded": true,"branches": ["alt-approach"],"thoughtHistoryLength": 3}
Workflow Pattern
Phase 1: Problem Decomposition
Thought 1: Identify problem scope and constraintsThought 2: Break into sub-problemsThought 3: Identify dependencies between sub-problems
Phase 2: Hypothesis Generation
Thought 4: Generate initial hypothesisThought 5: Identify evidence needed to verify
Phase 3: Verification & Iteration
Thought 6: Test hypothesis against evidenceThought 7: Revise if needed (isRevision=true)Thought 8: Branch if alternative path promising
Phase 4: Conclusion
Final Thought: Synthesize findings, provide answer (nextThoughtNeeded=false)
Best Practices
- Start with estimate, adjust as needed
- Initial
totalThoughtsis just a guess - Increase if problem more complex than expected
- Decrease if solution found early
- Use revisions for course correction
- Mark
isRevision=truewhen reconsidering - Reference
revisesThoughtfor clarity
- Branch for alternative approaches
- Use
branchFromThoughtto explore alternatives - Give meaningful
branchIdnames
- Filter irrelevant information
- Each thought should advance toward solution
- Ignore tangential details
- Don't rush completion
- Only
nextThoughtNeeded=falsewhen truly done - Verify hypothesis before concluding
Anti-Patterns
| Prohibited | Correct | |
|---|---|---|
| Use for simple tasks | Reserve for complex multi-step problems | |
| Skip thought numbers | Always increment correctly | |
| Conclude without verification | Verify hypothesis before final thought | |
| Ignore previous thoughts | Build upon or explicitly revise | |
| Fixed totalThoughts | Adjust as understanding evolves |
Integration with Other Tools
With ACE-Tool
ACE-Tool → align current state → Sequential Think → analyze and plan
With Context7
Sequential Think → coordinate analysis → Context7 → provide official patterns
With Serena
Serena → symbol-level exploration → Sequential Think → systematic analysis