dqz00116/skill-lib/code-analysis

Claude Code and agent skill by dqz00116/skill-lib

Trust tier 2
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Use when analyzing unfamiliar code modules, understanding system architecture, or preparing for refactoring

Install

npx vskill@latest install dqz00116/skill-lib/code-analysis

SKILL.md

Code Analysis Skill

Overview

Standardized workflow for reading, analyzing, and documenting codebases with attention-driven focus.

When to Use

Use this skill when you need to:

  • Understand a new code module or system
  • Analyze architecture and design patterns
  • Document technical implementation details
  • Prepare for code refactoring or integration
  • Create technical documentation for teams
  • Focus on core components (high-attention code analysis)

Attention-Driven Code Analysis (NEW in v1.2)

Identify core components in code using heuristic rules, optimizing analysis focus.

Attention Scoring System
python
# Use the attention_focus.py module
from attention_focus import CodeAttentionScorer
scorer = CodeAttentionScorer()
components = scorer.analyze_code_structure(file_content, file_name)
focus = scorer.get_analysis_focus(components)
Scoring Criteria
FactorWeightDescription
Core Keywords+3Manager, Controller, Handler, System, Core
Important Keywords+2Helper, Util, Factory, Provider
Lines of Code+2 (>100 lines) / +1 (50-100 lines)Scale metric
Reference Count+2 (>5 refs) / +1 (2-5 refs)Dependency metric
Complexity+1Methods>10 or Conditional statements>5
Attention Levels
LevelScoreAnalysis Depth
High8-10Detailed analysis + Full code + Design principles
Medium5-7Focused analysis + Key code snippets
Low0-4Brief mention + Function description
Workflow with Attention Focus
1. Read code file
↓
2. Run attention_focus.py analysis
↓
3. Get prioritized component list
↓
4. Analyze HIGH attention components in detail
5. Analyze MEDIUM attention components briefly
6. Reference LOW attention components as needed
↓
7. Generate focused documentation
Benefits
  • Reduce token consumption: Focus on 20% core code that provides 80% value
  • Faster analysis: Skip boilerplate and utility code
  • Better documentation: Highlight architectural decisions and critical paths
  • Estimated improvement: 20-30% token reduction, 30% faster analysis

Workflow Template

Every code analysis task MUST follow this 4-step structure:

1. Objective

Definition: Clear statement of what needs to be understood

Format:

Objective: [What specifically needs to be understood]
Scope: [Boundaries of the analysis]
Depth: [Overview/Core logic/Detailed implementation]

Examples:

  • Understand how the Tinker serialization library works
  • Analyze the architecture design of PlayerSubsystem
  • Master the SharedTable data table loading mechanism
2. Deliverables

Definition: Concrete outputs that will be produced

Format:

Documentation:
- [Doc name 1] - [Path] - [Content description]
- [Doc name 2] - [Path] - [Content description]
Additional outputs:
- [Code examples/Flowcharts/Architecture diagrams]

Documentation Standards:

  • Place in repository/projects/[Project]/docs/ or docs/
  • Use descriptive filenames: [Topic]-[Type].md
  • Include code snippets and diagrams
3. Content

Definition: What will be covered in the analysis

Format:

Analysis content:
1. [Module A] - [Point 1, Point 2, Point 3]
2. [Module B] - [Point 1, Point 2, Point 3]
3. [Inter-module relationships] - [Interaction flow]
Include elements:
□ Core class/interface design
□ Data flow/Control flow
□ Key algorithms/Logic
□ Design patterns
□ Dependencies
4. Token Estimation

Definition: Estimated token consumption for the analysis

Format:

Token estimation:
- Code reading: ~[X,000] tokens
- Documentation: ~[X,000] tokens
- Total: ~[X,000]-[Y,000] tokens
- Estimated time: [X]-[Y] minutes

Estimation Guidelines:

ComplexityCode readingDocumentationTotalTime
Simple (1-2 files)3K-5K2K-3K5K-8K15-20min
Medium (module-level)10K-20K5K-10K15K-30K30-50min
Complex (system-level)30K-50K15K-25K45K-75K60-90min

Execution Flow

1. User Request
│
▼
2. Clarify Requirements (if needed)
│
├── Confirm analysis scope boundaries
├── Confirm key class definition locations (file paths)
└── ⚠️ If definition locations are unclear, must ask the requester to explicitly specify
│
▼
3. Output Analysis Plan (4-step structure)
│
├── 1. Objective
├── 2. Deliverables
├── 3. Content
└── 4. Token Estimation
│
▼
4. Wait for "Plan Approval" Confirmation
│
▼
5. Execute Analysis
│
├── Read relevant code
├── Understand logic
└── Extract key points
│
▼
6. Produce Documentation
│
├── Write technical doc
├── Include code examples
└── Create diagrams if needed
│
▼
7. Report Completion
└── Summary of findings

Usage Examples

Example 1: Simple Module Analysis

User: "Analyze PlayerQuest's progress update mechanism"

Plan Output:

## Code Analysis Plan
### 1. Objective
Understand PlayerQuest's progress update mechanism, including:
- How progress is stored and updated
- Task completion determination logic
- Interaction with the medal system
### 2. Deliverables
- `PlayerQuest-Progress-Analysis.md`
- Path: `repository/projects/BattleCore/docs/`
- Contains: Flowchart + Core code + Data flow
### 3. Content
1. PlayerQuest class structure
2. updateProgress() / accumulateProgress() implementation
3. Task completion determination logic
4. Coupling relationship with PlayerMedal
### 4. Token Estimation
- Code reading: ~5,000 tokens
- Documentation: ~3,000 tokens
- Total: ~8,000 tokens
- Estimated time: 15-20 minutes
Example 2: Complex System Analysis

User: "Understand the overall skill system architecture"

Plan Output:

## Code Analysis Plan
### 1. Objective
Fully understand the FAbility skill system architecture:
- Core class hierarchy
- State machine implementation
- Skill lifecycle
- Integration with the battle core
### 2. Deliverables
- `FAbility-Architecture.md`
- Path: `repository/projects/BattleCore/docs/`
- Contains: Architecture diagram + Class diagram + Real-world examples
- `Skill-Lifecycle-Flow.md`
- Complete skill lifecycle flow
### 3. Content
1. FAbility base class design
2. State machine (EAbilityState)
3. Concrete skill implementation examples
4. CD/Cost system
5. Event system
### 4. Token Estimation
- Code reading: ~30,000 tokens
- Documentation: ~15,000 tokens
- Total: ~45,000 tokens
- Estimated time: 60-80 minutes

Important Rules

Definition Location Confirmation Rule (Critical)

Rule: When definition locations are unclear during code analysis, must ask the requester to explicitly specify the location in advance

Execution Steps:

  1. After receiving an analysis request, first attempt to locate the definition files of key classes/functions
  2. If the location cannot be determined through file name or class name search, immediately stop analysis
  3. Ask the requester: "Please provide the definition file path for [ClassName]"
  4. After receiving a clear path, continue analysis

Example:

❌ Incorrect approach:
User: "Analyze NetMessage implementation"
AI: (Blindly search, can't find correct location, analyze based on assumptions)
✅ Correct approach:
User: "Analyze NetMessage implementation"
AI: "Please provide the definition file path for NetMessage,
Search found possible locations:
- Server/Network/NetMessage.h
- Server/Common/NetMessage.h
Please confirm which file?"
User: "In Server/Network/NetMessage.h"
AI: (Start analysis based on explicit path)

Best Practices

Do's

✅ Define clear scope boundaries, avoid over-analysis ✅ Provide specific file paths and line numbers ✅ Include actual code snippets ✅ Use diagrams to aid understanding (text descriptions) ✅ Estimates should be conservative, leave buffer

Don'ts

❌ Don't use vague scopes ("analyze the entire project") ❌ Don't omit key deliverable information ❌ Don't underestimate token consumption for complex systems ❌ Don't mix multiple unrelated objectives ❌ Don't blindly guess when definition locations are unclear (must ask the requester to explicitly specify file paths)

Integration with Other Skills

  • knowledge-base-cache: Store analysis results in knowledge base
  • git-workflow: Commit analysis documents
  • skill-creator: Create specialized analysis skills from patterns

Template Quick Reference

markdown
## Code Analysis Plan
### 1. Objective
[Specific objective description]
Scope: [Scope boundaries]
Depth: [Overview/Core/Detailed]
### 2. Deliverables
-[Doc name] - [Path] - [Description]
### 3. Content
1.[Module A] - [Key points]
2.[Module B] - [Key points]
3.[Relationships] - [Flow]
### 4. Token Estimation
-Code reading: ~[X,000] tokens
-Documentation: ~[X,000] tokens
-Total: ~[X,000]-[Y,000] tokens
-Estimated time: [X]-[Y] minutes

Version History

  • v1.2 (2026-02-12) - Added Attention-Driven Analysis
  • Added: attention_focus.py module
  • Added: Heuristic code attention scoring
  • Added: Three-level analysis depth (High/Medium/Low)
  • Optimized: 20-30% token reduction
  • Optimized: 30% faster analysis speed
  • v1.1 (2026-02-10) - Added critical rule
  • Added: Definition location confirmation rule
  • Added: Important Rules section
  • Updated: Execution Flow added path confirmation step
  • Updated: Best Practices added Don'ts rules
  • v1.0 (2026-02-10) - Initial release
  • 4-step workflow structure
  • Token estimation guidelines
  • Usage examples and templates

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
20
Repository forks
6
7-day trend score
15

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Refreshed 26 Apr 2026, 6 months ago.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/dqz00116/skill-lib/code-analysis/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/dqz00116/skill-lib/code-analysis)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.