e0ipso/strikethroo/st-full-workflow
Claude Code and agent skill by e0ipso/strikethroo
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Use when the user asks to run the complete end-to-end Strikethroo workflow for a work order in one shot in this repository — triggers include full workflow, end-to-end, plan and execute, do everything, run the whole strikethroo workflow. Do not use when the user wants only one stage (create a plan, generate tasks, or execute a blueprint); use the dedicated skill for that stage instead.
Install
npx vskill@latest install e0ipso/strikethroo/st-full-workflowSKILL.md
st-full-workflow
Critical Rule
Execute all three steps sequentially without waiting for user input between them.
Inputs
The user supplies the work order conversationally.
Operating Procedure
Step 1: Plan Creation
1. Locate the strikethroo root
Run scripts/find-strikethroo-root.cjs from the user's working directory. If it exits non-zero, stop and ask the user to run npx strikethroo init.
Treat the path it prints as <root> for every subsequent step.
2. Load project context
Read these files, in order:
<root>/config/STRIKETHROO.mdfor this project's directory conventions.<root>/config/hooks/PRE_PLAN.md, and execute its instructions before
proceeding.
3. Analyze the work order
Identify:
- Objective.
- Scope and explicit boundaries.
- Success criteria.
- Dependencies, prerequisites, blockers.
- Technical requirements and constraints.
- Blast radius size.
4. Clarification loop
If any critical context is missing, ask the user targeted questions. Keep looping until you have no further questions. Explicitly confirm whether backwards compatibility is required. Never invent answers; never paper over a missing answer.
If the user declines to clarify a blocking question, stop and report the plan as needing clarification. Do not produce a partial plan.
Read <root>/config/shared/anti-rationalization.md and apply it to this rationalization table:
| You catch yourself thinking… | …do this instead | |
|---|---|---|
| "I can deduce the answer." | An assumption is not an answer. Ask the question and never invent answers. | |
| "Asking again is annoying." | A silent wrong assumption is unrecoverable. Ask. | |
| "The user implied it, so it's settled." | An implication is not a confirmation. Surface it as a question and get an explicit answer. |
5. Allocate the next plan ID
Run scripts/get-next-plan-id.cjs for the next available plan ID. Compute its zero-padded form for the directory name ({padded-id}--{slug}) and use the unpadded integer in the plan frontmatter.
6. Emit the plan
Read <root>/config/templates/PLAN_TEMPLATE.md. Projects customize this template, so follow it instead of any default plan layout.
Write the plan to <root>/plans/{padded-id}--{slug}/plan-{padded-id}--{slug}.md, conforming to the plan template in both frontmatter and sections. Derive <slug> from the plan summary: lowercase, alphanumeric and hyphens only, no prepositions, no conjunctions, repeated hyphens collapsed, trimmed.
Do not include time estimates, task lists, or code samples.
7. Run post-plan hook
Execute <root>/config/hooks/POST_PLAN.md.
8. Emit the Step 1 structured summary
Conclude Step 1 with exactly this block (an update notice, when present, follows the workflow's final summary):
Parse the Plan ID value from this output and pass it to Step 2.
Step 2: Task Generation
Using the plan ID from Step 1:
1. Resolve the plan
Run scripts/validate-plan-blueprint.cjs <plan-id> planFile for the plan file's absolute path. Another field name prints that field instead.
If the script exits non-zero, surface its stderr to the user and stop the workflow. Do not guess a different ID.
2. Load project context
Read these files, in order:
<root>/config/STRIKETHROO.md— project and directory conventions.- The plan body at the path returned by step 1 — the contract for
what tasks must exist.
<root>/config/templates/TASK_TEMPLATE.md— the schema every task file
must match.
<root>/config/shared/anti-rationalization.md— apply in step 3.
3. Analyze and decompose the plan
Read the entire plan. Identify all concrete deliverables explicitly stated. Decompose each deliverable into atomic tasks only when genuinely needed.
Task minimization (mandatory):
- Create only the minimum number of tasks necessary. Target a 20–30%
reduction from comprehensive lists by questioning the necessity of each candidate.
- Every task corresponds to an explicit requirement, never a nice-to-have, a
"best practice", or future extensibility the plan does not mention.
- Each task has a unique, non-overlapping purpose.
- Keep error handling inside the task that owns the behavior it guards.
Apply <root>/config/shared/anti-rationalization.md to this rationalization table:
| You catch yourself thinking… | The binding rule | |
|---|---|---|
| "One extra task won't hurt." | It violates the 20–30% minimization target. Every task traces to an explicitly stated deliverable or it does not exist. | |
| "This edge case deserves its own task." | Fold it into the task that owns the behavior. Do not split trivially small operations into separate units. | |
| "I'll add a test suite to be safe." | Comprehensive tests for trivial functionality are gold-plating. Follow the test philosophy — meaningful tests only. | |
| "Future extensibility justifies this task." | YAGNI. The plan does not mention it, so it is not a task. |
4. Apply granularity and skill rules
Each task must be:
- Single-purpose — one clear deliverable.
- Atomic — cannot be meaningfully split further.
- Skill-specific — executable by an agent with 1–2 technical skills.
- Verifiable — has explicit acceptance criteria that include at least one
concrete, runnable verification step (a command plus its expected output, or another observable signal). Never settle for a vague "works correctly".
Infer skills in kebab-case from the task's technical requirements. Use one skill for a single-domain task and two for complementary domains, such as ["api-endpoints", "database"]. Three or more means the task must be broken down further.
5. Test philosophy: "write a few tests, mostly integration"
Write tests for:
- Custom business logic and algorithms.
- Critical user workflows and data transformations.
- Edge cases and error conditions in core functionality.
- Integration points between components.
- Complex validation or calculation logic.
Do not write tests for:
- Third-party library and framework functionality.
- Simple CRUD without custom logic.
- Trivial getters/setters and static configuration.
- Obvious functionality that would break immediately if incorrect.
Combine related test scenarios into one task ("Test user authentication flow", not separate tasks for login, logout, and validation). Favor integration and critical-path coverage over per-method unit tests. Never create one test task per CRUD operation.
Copy these rules into the "Implementation Notes" of every test task you generate.
6. Dependency analysis
Task B depends on task A when B requires A's output or artifacts, modifies code created by A, or tests functionality implemented by A. Record it as a hard dependency when B cannot start before A completes and as a soft dependency when B merely runs better after A. Validate that the final dependency graph is acyclic.
7. Complexity analysis
For every candidate task, assign a complexity_score (integer 1–10) before writing any file. Read references/complexity-rubric.md before scoring; it defines the four dimensions each band is judged on. Then apply these rules:
- Score ≥ 8 → decompose further; do not emit as-is.
- Score 6–7 → sharpen or split; do not emit without an explicit reason.
- Vague acceptance criteria → sharpen them into a concrete, runnable
verification step.
- Trivially small adjacent tasks → merge them.
Loop-back rule: after applying split, sharpen, or merge, re-run dependency analysis and re-score the adjusted tasks. Repeat no more than three times. If complexity is still unresolved after three passes, stop and surface the blocker to the user.
8. Allocate task IDs
Run scripts/get-next-task-id.cjs <plan-id> once for the first available task ID, then allocate the rest by incrementing in-process. Use the unpadded integer in the task frontmatter id field and the zero-padded form in the filename. The slug derives from a short task title: lowercase, alphanumeric and hyphens only, collapsed, trimmed.
9. Emit the task files
Write each task to:
Each file must conform to <root>/config/templates/TASK_TEMPLATE.md. Add complexity_notes only when the score needs justification. Never write execution_profile; the routing helper writes it.
Fill every body section with task-specific content. Place detailed implementation guidance inside a <details> block under "Implementation Notes", written so a non-thinking LLM could execute the task from that section alone.
10. Validation checklist
Before declaring task generation complete, verify:
- Every explicitly stated deliverable in the plan is covered by a task.
- No two tasks overlap in purpose.
- Dependencies form an acyclic graph, with no orphan or circular references.
- Groups are consistent across the plan.
- After writing the task files, run
scripts/validate-plan-blueprint.cjs <plan-id> complexityScoresValid. Stop unless it prints yes; if it prints no, run scripts/validate-plan-blueprint.cjs <plan-id> invalidComplexityTasks to see which files are missing, non-integer, or out-of-range, fix them, and re-run.
11. Route task execution
Read <root>/config/hooks/TASK_EXECUTION_ROUTING.md and follow its instructions together with this procedure:
- Run
scripts/route-task-execution.cjs profiles <plan-id>. Onno-config
or disabled, routing is off; skip the remaining routing steps and continue. On invalid-config, stop and surface the errors to the user; do not generate the blueprint.
- Assign every task in the plan's
tasks/directory exactly one configured
profile name. Classify the tasks generated in this run from the content already in your context. If the plan carried task files from an earlier generation run, read those files to classify them.
- Write the complete task-ID-to-profile mapping as a JSON object to a
temporary file, for example {"1": "routine", "2": "demanding"}.
- Run
scripts/route-task-execution.cjs apply <plan-id> <mapping-file>.
Target selection happens later at task dispatch, never during generation.
- On
routed, delete the temporary mapping file and continue. On any failure
result (invalid-assignments, invalid-tasks, routing-failure, infrastructure-failure), stop and surface the JSON errors to the user. Never continue to blueprint generation with partially routed tasks.
Never hand-write a concrete execution target into task frontmatter or task bodies.
12. Run the POST_TASK_GENERATION_ALL hook
Read <root>/config/hooks/POST_TASK_GENERATION_ALL.md and follow its instructions, using <root>/config/templates/BLUEPRINT_TEMPLATE.md for the Execution Blueprint structure. Run the hook only after routing succeeded or reported routing off.
Step 3: Blueprint Execution
Using the plan ID from Step 1:
1. Validate the plan and the tasks
- Run
scripts/validate-plan-blueprint.cjs <plan-id> planFilefor the plan
file's absolute path. If the script exits non-zero, surface its stderr to the user and stop the workflow.
- Run
scripts/validate-plan-blueprint.cjs <plan-id> planDirand treat the
printed path as <plan-dir>.
- Run
scripts/validate-plan-blueprint.cjs <plan-id> taskCountand
scripts/validate-plan-blueprint.cjs <plan-id> blueprintExists.
2. Auto-generate tasks and blueprint if missing
If taskCount is 0 or blueprintExists is no:
Notify the user: "⚠️ Tasks or execution blueprint not found. Generating tasks automatically..."
- Execute the full task generation procedure from Step 2 for this plan ID.
- Re-run the
planFile,planDir,taskCount, andblueprintExistsqueries to refresh the resolved paths and counts.
This is the start of the file. Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/st-full-workflow/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 56
- Repository forks
- 3
- 7-day trend score
- 20
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/e0ipso/strikethroo/st-full-workflow)