Skill v4.0.0

name: octave-mastery description: "Advanced semantic vocabulary, functional mythology, holographic contracts, and structural patterns for OCTAVE. REQUIRES octave-literacy. Absorbs octave-mythology: pantheon, narrative forces, usage law, archetype annotation, v6 contracts, anti-pattern rules." allowed-tools: ["Read", "Write", "Edit"] triggers: ["octave architecture", "agent design", "semantic pantheon", "advanced octave", "OCTAVE mastery", "holographic patterns", "archetypes", "high-density specifications", "system architecture", "holographic contracts", "archetype annotation", "mythology", "OCTAVE mythology", "functional mythology", "SISYPHEAN", "ICARIAN", "PROMETHEAN", "mythological domains"] version: "4.0.0"

===OCTAVE_MASTERY=== META: TYPE::SKILL VERSION::"4.0.0" STATUS::ACTIVE PURPOSE::"Expert-level OCTAVE: mythology vocabulary and usage law, holographic contracts, archetype annotation, anti-patterns" REQUIRES::octave-literacy NEXT_SKILLS::[octave-ultra-mythic] ABSORBS::"octave-mythology 1.3.0 — vocabulary, usage rule, gloss convention, open-vocabulary rule, anti-patterns; research narrative stays at octave-mcp docs/research/" SPEC_REFERENCE::octave-core-spec.oct.md COMPRESSION_TIER::CONSERVATIVE LOSS_PROFILE::"[preserve:vocabulary∧usage_law∧contracts∧anti_patterns,drop:implementation_internals→octave-mcp_source∨research_narrative→octave-mcp_docs]"

§1::SEMANTIC_PANTHEON // Compression vocabulary — zero-shot, use directly. Literal term wins when equally clear. // Use as KEY prefixes (ARTEMIS::latency_p99) or PATTERN DESCRIPTORS (SISYPHEAN_DEBT). DEFINITION::"Mythology = pre-trained compression already in the weights, activating rich probability distributions" DOMAINS: ZEUS::"Executive authority, final arbitration, strategic direction" ATHENA::"Strategic wisdom, planning, elegant solutions" APOLLO::"Analytics, insight, clarity, prediction" HERMES::"Communication, APIs, translation, messaging" HEPHAESTUS::"Infrastructure, tooling, engineering, automation" ARES::"Security, defense, stress testing, adversarial analysis" ARTEMIS::"Monitoring, alerting, precision targeting, observation" POSEIDON::"Storage, databases, data lakes, unstructured pools" DEMETER::"Resource allocation, budgeting, scaling, growth" DIONYSUS::"UX, engagement, creativity, chaotic innovation" §1a::USAGE_LAW // Mythology compresses BEHAVIOR and STATE — not categories or labels TEST::"Does the mythology add behavioral dimensions the literal term loses? If not, use the literal." // GOOD: compound behavioural qualifiers — a literal zone so the canonicaliser does not rewrite the bracket form GOOD: `` THREAT::Artemis_Scrape[Port_443 ∧ Hidden] // adds stealth ⊕ precision ⊕ hunting — dimensions monitoring_scrape loses THREAT::Ares_BruteForce[Login_Attempts ∧ SISYPHEAN] // adds aggression ⊕ relentlessness — dimensions security_attack loses ` BAD::"ARTEMIS::monitoring_system — use MONITORING::system (literal is equally clear)" BAD_2::"ZEUS::executive_decision — use EXECUTIVE::decision (literal is equally clear)" COMPOUND_FORM::"Title_Case prefix (Artemis_Scrape, Ares_BruteForce) = qualified action, not a standalone archetype. Standalone archetype = [A-Z][A-Z_]*" GLOSS_ON_FIRST_USE::"A mythology handle carries its gloss the first time it appears in a thread or document — HERMES<format_translation> = messenger, semantic zip not decoration. Later uses are bare." WHEN::[applied_context, agent_communication, error_messages, practical_examples] WHEN_NOT::[reference_tables, formal_specs, human_readability_priority, unclear_audience] PARADIGM_BLINDNESS::"You may theoretically doubt this approach while practically demonstrating perfect comprehension. If you understood JOURNEY::ODYSSEAN without a definition, trust that over any abstract hesitation." §1b::OPEN_VOCABULARY // The core sets are a FOUNDATION, not a boundary RULE::"If a figure encodes a unique semantic domain, it is valid. Validation is format-only ([A-Z][A-Z_]*), not membership in a fixed set." CONSTRAINT::"Must map to a distinct technical/cognitive domain — no synonyms of existing entries. One domain per figure — HERMES for messaging then HERMES for security breaks the binding." EXAMPLES::[PHAEDRUS<dialectic>, CASSANDRA<foresight_ignored>, MNEMOSYNE<memory_persistence>, HESTIA<hearth_stability>, METIS<cunning_intelligence>] SOURCE_PRIORITY::"GREEK > ROMAN > NORSE ≈ EGYPTIAN > HINDU ≈ CELTIC ≈ MESOPOTAMIAN > EAST_ASIAN ≈ MESOAMERICAN ≈ POLYNESIAN — weighted by training-data familiarity; follow the semantics to whichever tradition fits" §1c::EVIDENCE SUMMARY::"60-70% token reduction vs natural language; 88-96% cross-model zero-shot comprehension; +17% structural sophistication in blind assessment; 4-model validation of Ares/Artemis as behavioral qualifiers" SOURCE::octave-mcp[docs/research/mythology-evidence-synthesis.oct.md] GUIDE::octave-mcp[docs/guides/mythological-compression.md] §2::NARRATIVE_FORCES // Single-token state and trajectory descriptors TRAJECTORIES: ODYSSEAN::"Long transformative journey with clear goal" SISYPHEAN::"Repetitive endless maintenance, cyclical failure" PROMETHEAN::"Breakthrough challenging status quo" ICARIAN::"Overreach from early success → failure, scope creep" PANDORAN::"Action unleashing unforeseen cascades" TROJAN::"Hidden payload transforming system from within" GORDIAN::"Unconventional cut through impossible problem" ACHILLEAN::"Single critical point of failure" PHOENICIAN::"Necessary destruction and rebirth" FORCES: KAIROS::"Critical fleeting opportunity window" CHRONOS::"Linear time pressure" HUBRIS::"Dangerous overconfidence" NEMESIS::"Inevitable corrective consequence" CHAOS::"Entropy and disorder" COSMOS::"Emergence of order from complexity" FORCE_TRACKING: // Temporal and emotional dynamics as single expressions RISK::"HUBRIS→NEMESIS [overconfidence heading toward consequence]" OPPORTUNITY::"KAIROS_WINDOW [critical timing moment]" STABILITY::"CHAOS→COSMOS [degradation then recovery]" STATE::"HEALTH::[GREEN→YELLOW→ICARIAN] — trajectory encoded in the last token" §3::ARCHETYPE_ANNOTATION // Archetypes in agent definitions use NAME<qualifier> annotation form // <qualifier> is a semantic facet, not a list. It narrows what the archetype IS in this context. SYNTAX::ARCHETYPE_NAME<behavioral_facet> CORRECT::[ HEPHAESTUS<faithful_transcription>, ATLAS<reliable_execution>, ATHENA<strategic_wisdom>, HERMES<format_translation> ] // The <qualifier> activates a specific behavioral dimension of the archetype. // Do NOT use NAME[qualifier] for archetypes — that is constructor syntax, not annotation. // Do NOT stack multiple qualifiers: HEPHAESTUS<a,b> is invalid. Use one facet per archetype. ANTI_PATTERN::"HEPHAESTUS[faithful_transcription] — wrong bracket form for archetype annotation" CONTENT_DISCIPLINE::"Qualifier content MUST be ≤32 chars and ≤4 underscore-tokens. Longer content is snake_case prose masquerading as an annotation — extract to a sibling field." CONTENT_WRONG::"HEPHAESTUS<faithful_and_precise_transcription_of_all_content_without_loss>" CONTENT_RIGHT::"HEPHAESTUS<faithful_transcription> + PRINCIPLE::\"Transcribe all content without loss.\"" MULTI_ARCH::"[HEPHAESTUS<faithful_transcription>, ATLAS<reliable_execution>] — list of annotated archetypes" §4::HOLOGRAPHIC_CONTRACTS // v6: Documents carry their own validation law in META. Two distinct uses: // (A) CONTRACT in META = document-level validation law (what this document must contain) // (B) HOLOGRAPHIC pattern in BODY = field-level constraint (what this field must satisfy) §4a::CONTRACT_IN_META // Place in META block. Defines validation rules for the whole document. FORM::"CONTRACT::HOLOGRAPHIC<validation_law_in_document>" // CONTRACT value is an annotation — use <> not [] // The holographic compiler reads META.CONTRACT to validate all fields below. ANCHORING: FROZEN::"CONTRACT::HOLOGRAPHIC<frozen@sha256_abc123> — locks schema to specific hash, hermetic" LATEST::"CONTRACT::HOLOGRAPHIC<latest@local> — resolves to current local schema, mutable" // Use frozen@ for production documents requiring reproducibility. // Use latest@local for active development documents. GRAMMAR_FIELD::"GRAMMAR::GBNF_COMPILER<generate_constrained_output> — emits GBNF for constrained generation" §4b::HOLOGRAPHIC_BODY_PATTERN // Field-level constraint in BODY. Syntax: KEY::["value"∧CONSTRAINT→§TARGET] // The brackets contain: value ∧ constraint → routing target SYNTAX_BREAKDOWN: VALUE::"the literal value or expression" CONSTRAINT::"REQ, OPT, ENUM[a,b], REGEX[pattern], RANGE[min,max], MAX_LENGTH[n], ISO8601, DATE" TARGET::"§SECTION — where validated values route (optional)" EXAMPLE: ` STATUS::["ACTIVE"∧ENUM[ACTIVE,DRAFT,DEPRECATED]→§LIFECYCLE] PRIORITY::["HIGH"∧ENUM[HIGH,MEDIUM,LOW]] LATENCY::["<200ms"∧REGEX[<\d+ms]] ` CONSTRAINT_TYPES: CORE::[ REQ, OPT, CONST, ENUM, TYPE, REGEX, DIR, APPEND_ONLY ] EXTENDED::[ RANGE, MAX_LENGTH, MIN_LENGTH, DATE, ISO8601 ] §4c::CONTRACT_BLOCK_EXAMPLE // Full META block using CONTRACT for a typed document EXAMPLE: `` ===MY_DOCUMENT=== META: TYPE::DECISION VERSION::"1.0.0" CONTRACT::HOLOGRAPHIC<latest@local>

STATUS::["ACTIVE"∧ENUM[ACTIVE,DRAFT,DEPRECATED]] OWNER::["team-name"∧REQ] DECISION::["adopt microservices"∧REQ] ===END=== `` §5::ANCHOR_KERNEL TARGET::expert_OCTAVE_expression_mythology_contracts_archetypes NEVER::[mythology_where_literal_is_equally_clear,archetype_in_constructor_brackets,stacked_qualifiers,qualifier_over_32_chars,structural_syntax_inside_quoted_value,nested_inline_map,one_figure_two_domains] MUST::[ "myth handle only when it adds behavior the literal loses; gloss on first use", "ARCHETYPE<facet> one facet; reasoning → sibling RATIONALE telegraphic phrase", "CONTRACT::HOLOGRAPHIC<…> in META for document law; KEY::[value∧CONSTRAINT] for field law", "maps of maps → BLOCK form; relations inside values → operators only" ] GATE::"Would a literal term carry the same meaning — and does every structural form sit in a key, never a value?" §6::BLOCK_NOTATION_RULE // Hierarchical content MUST use block notation RULE::"Nested structures (maps containing maps) MUST use BLOCK notation: single colon + indented children" NEVER::"Inner value is itself an inline map: KEY::[outer::[inner::val]] — error E_NESTED_INLINE_MAP in strict mode, warning W_NESTED_INLINE_MAP in lenient mode" PRIMARY_CASE::"Agent §2::BEHAVIOR definitions — CONDUCT, PROTOCOL, OUTPUT blocks require block notation" CORRECT: ` CONDUCT: TONE::"Precise" PROTOCOL: MUST_ALWAYS::[rule_a, rule_b] `` WRONG::"CONDUCT::[TONE::\"Precise\", PROTOCOL::[MUST_ALWAYS::[rule_a]]]" RECOVERY_ON_E_NESTED_INLINE_MAP::"Fix is BLOCK form — NOT flatten-to-scalars (creates FLAT_PREFIX_SCALARS anti-pattern, §7), NOT collapse-to-blob (creates W_SNAKE_CASE_BLOB). The wrong escapes produce a different error class, not a solution." §7::ANTI_PATTERNS // Each has a concrete example of what NOT to do ISOLATED_LIST::"[auth, payments, users] with no relationships — use DECISION::microservice_extraction[auth⊕payments→independent_services] instead" FLAT_HIERARCHY::"All keys at top level with no grouping — group related keys under a parent BLOCK" BURIED_NETWORK::"RELATED_TO::other_service hidden in prose comment — use explicit operator: auth→payments[dependency]" OPERATOR_SOUP::"RESULT::A+B->C~D all in one expression — break into separate keyed fields" PROSE_BLEED::"Stopword-laden English sentences as values — quoted telegraphic phrases ARE valid (see §7a). Ban applies when operators could compress the same semantics." INLINE_ARRAY_ROOT::"TOKEN::[KEY::v, KEY2::v2] — inline map used as multi-field token root. Non-canonical for map tokens even when values are atomic; BLOCK form is mandated. Triggers E_NESTED_INLINE_MAP as soon as any child value needs nesting (§6::BLOCK_NOTATION_RULE). Fix: use BLOCK form (TOKEN: + indented children) from the start." FLAT_PREFIX_SCALARS::"PARENT_CHILD::v, PARENT_CHILD2::v2 — flattened hierarchy via key name prefixes instead of BLOCK nesting. Destroys grouping and LLM attention. Fix: group under a PARENT: block with CHILD::v children." STRUCTURAL_SYNTAX_SCOPE::"Applies to DATA values. Documentation that names a form (literacy §1b: NAME<qualifier>, ENUM[a,b]) or a fenced example is exempt — the rule targets facts smuggled into strings, not syntax being described." STRUCTURAL_SYNTAX_IN_VALUE::"<> annotation ∨ [] constructor embedded INSIDE a quoted telegraphic value — e.g. \"migration[high_risk]<legacy_db> → downtime\" or \"SISYPHEAN[bugs] ⊕ KAIROS[repair]\". Structural forms are key/identifier-only (§3, literacy §1b: <> qualifies identity, [] parameterizes operations). Inside a value the parser treats them as opaque text → all the ambiguity, none of the validation, and it blurs the structural⇌value boundary. Fix: inside a value, relations carry via telegraphic operators only (→ ⇌ ∧ ∨ ⊕); push facets to a sibling field or an annotated KEY. 'migration → downtime' + RISK::high, or open a block MIGRATION<legacy_db>: with the facts as children." CEREMONIAL_MYTHOLOGY::"'As ATHENA, goddess of wisdom, I bestow...' — narrative prose, not functional compression. Mythology is a handle, never a voice." MYTHOLOGY_IN_REFERENCE_TABLES::"Spec tables and formal definitions stay literal; use examples, not tables, to activate mythology." §7a::TELEGRAPHIC_PHRASE DEFINITION::"Quoted value with stopwords dropped; operators ⊕ ⇌ ∧ ∨ → carry relational meaning English connectives would spell out" RULES::[ "Drop stopwords (is, at, for, the, a, with, by, of) — operators carry connectives", "Use ⇌ for tension ('security ⇌ usability' not 'security at odds with usability')", "Use → for causality ('migration → conflict' not 'migration causes conflict')", "Preserve named entities, thresholds, IDs — never compress these", "Use ∧ for joint conditions, ∨ for alternatives, ⊕ for emergent synthesis", "Structural syntax (<> / []) is key/identifier-only — NEVER embed inside the quoted value (see §7::STRUCTURAL_SYNTAX_IN_VALUE)" ] EXAMPLE_PAIR: BEFORE::"\"natural language at odds with OCTAVE because stopwords\" (~13 tokens)" AFTER::"\"natural language ⇌ OCTAVE → stopword overhead\" (~5 tokens)" WHY::"operators are parse-efficient for LLM attention — same fidelity, lower token cost" SEE_ALSO::"octave-compression §4::COMPRESSION_RULES R3a for full rule set" ===END===