ever-works/orgs/comp-band-review

Claude Code and agent skill by ever-works/orgs

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Use when reviewing compensation for a role, a team, or the whole population — checks where people sit against defensible bands, finds equity gaps, and produces a ranked, costed set of adjustments.

Install

npx vskill@latest install ever-works/orgs/comp-band-review

SKILL.md

Compensation Band Review

A playbook for turning pay from a series of one-off negotiations into a consistent, defensible system. The failure mode it prevents: bands that drift out of touch, people quietly underpaid against newer hires, and "fixes" proposed without their price so leadership can't actually act.

Ground the bands

  1. Confirm the bands you're reviewing against: the range per role and level. If a band hasn't been checked against market and internal reality recently, that's step zero — a review against a stale band measures nothing.
  2. State the scope: one role, one team, or the full population, and the point-in-time snapshot you're using.

Map where people sit

  1. Place each person in their band: below range, low, mid, high, or above. Note tenure and last change so you can tell a deliberate position from neglect.
  2. Find the pressure points: compression (newer hires paid near or above longer-tenured peers), people stuck below range, and bands drifting below market for roles you need to hire into.

Check equity

  1. Compare comparable work: people doing the same job at the same level should sit in a defensible relationship, whatever their negotiating history. Flag gaps that pay for the same work differently without a reason.
  2. Bring in ratings from the Performance Lead where pay should reflect performance, so merit and position move together rather than at cross purposes.

Cost the fixes

  1. For each proposed adjustment, compute the cost — the raise, and its ongoing and knock-on effects. A fairness fix without its price isn't a recommendation, it's a wish.
  2. Rank the adjustments by impact: the equity gaps and retention risks that matter most, first, so a limited budget lands where it counts.

Recommend

  1. Present the decision-ready set: who, from what to what, why, and what it costs — routing anything outside an approved band to the Head of People for the call.

Quality bar

  • Every position is measured against a current, market-checked band.
  • Equity gaps for comparable work are surfaced, not buried in averages.
  • Every recommendation carries its cost and a one-line, deliverable rationale.

Output format

Band review: scope and snapshot → position table (person, band, placement, tenure) → equity and compression flags → ranked, costed adjustment list → recommendations, with out-of-band cases routed up.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

7-day trend score
5

Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/ever-works/orgs/comp-band-review/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/ever-works/orgs/comp-band-review)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.