ever-works/orgs/comp-band-review
Claude Code and agent skill by ever-works/orgs
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Use when reviewing compensation for a role, a team, or the whole population — checks where people sit against defensible bands, finds equity gaps, and produces a ranked, costed set of adjustments.
Install
npx vskill@latest install ever-works/orgs/comp-band-reviewSKILL.md
Compensation Band Review
A playbook for turning pay from a series of one-off negotiations into a consistent, defensible system. The failure mode it prevents: bands that drift out of touch, people quietly underpaid against newer hires, and "fixes" proposed without their price so leadership can't actually act.
Ground the bands
- Confirm the bands you're reviewing against: the range per role and level. If a band hasn't been checked against market and internal reality recently, that's step zero — a review against a stale band measures nothing.
- State the scope: one role, one team, or the full population, and the point-in-time snapshot you're using.
Map where people sit
- Place each person in their band: below range, low, mid, high, or above. Note tenure and last change so you can tell a deliberate position from neglect.
- Find the pressure points: compression (newer hires paid near or above longer-tenured peers), people stuck below range, and bands drifting below market for roles you need to hire into.
Check equity
- Compare comparable work: people doing the same job at the same level should sit in a defensible relationship, whatever their negotiating history. Flag gaps that pay for the same work differently without a reason.
- Bring in ratings from the Performance Lead where pay should reflect performance, so merit and position move together rather than at cross purposes.
Cost the fixes
- For each proposed adjustment, compute the cost — the raise, and its ongoing and knock-on effects. A fairness fix without its price isn't a recommendation, it's a wish.
- Rank the adjustments by impact: the equity gaps and retention risks that matter most, first, so a limited budget lands where it counts.
Recommend
- Present the decision-ready set: who, from what to what, why, and what it costs — routing anything outside an approved band to the Head of People for the call.
Quality bar
- Every position is measured against a current, market-checked band.
- Equity gaps for comparable work are surfaced, not buried in averages.
- Every recommendation carries its cost and a one-line, deliverable rationale.
Output format
Band review: scope and snapshot → position table (person, band, placement, tenure) → equity and compression flags → ranked, costed adjustment list → recommendations, with out-of-band cases routed up.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingcompanies/cornerstone-people/skills/comp-band-review/SKILL.md
Popularity
- 7-day trend score
- 5
Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/ever-works/orgs/comp-band-review)