ever-works/orgs/plan-eng-review
Claude Code and agent skill by ever-works/orgs
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Use when a product-approved plan needs an engineering-manager review — architecture, data flow, state machines, failure modes, edge cases, and a test matrix — before it is locked for implementation.
Install
npx vskill@latest install ever-works/orgs/plan-eng-reviewSKILL.md
Plan Engineering Review
The pass that turns a product plan into something an engineer can build without inventing architecture mid-task. Assumptions that survive this review in writing are the only assumptions allowed to exist.
Steps
- Draw before judging. Produce the diagrams the plan implies — a
component diagram for boundaries, a sequence diagram for each main flow, a state diagram for anything with a lifecycle, a data-flow diagram for anything that transforms input. Plain-text diagrams are fine; the act of drawing is the audit. Anything that cannot be drawn is not yet understood.
- Walk the failure paths. For each sequence diagram, ask at every arrow:
what happens if this call fails, hangs, returns twice, or returns garbage? The plan must answer with retry, surface, or accept — silence is a finding.
- Name the edge cases. Empty states, first-run, concurrent writers,
pagination boundaries, timezone and encoding hazards, permission boundaries, quota exhaustion. List them explicitly; "handled generically" is not an answer.
- Check the trust boundaries. Where does external input enter? Where do
privileges change? Each crossing needs validation on the boundary, not somewhere after it.
- Build the test matrix. Rows are behaviors from the plan, columns are
the conditions that vary (auth state, data size, failure injection). Every cell is a test that exists, a test to write, or an explicit won't-test with a reason.
- Rule on build order. Integration points land first; two slices that
meet at an interface get that contract written before either side builds against imagination.
- Lock or bounce. Lock the plan only when every finding above is either
absorbed into the plan or explicitly accepted as a risk with an owner.
Quality bar
- Every main flow has a sequence diagram with failure paths annotated.
- The edge-case list is enumerated, not gestured at.
- The test matrix has no blank cells — only tests or reasoned won't-tests.
Output format
A locked plan appendix: Diagrams, Failure Paths, Edge Cases, Trust Boundaries, Test Matrix, Build Order, and a LOCKED line naming accepted risks.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingcompanies/stackwise-engineering/skills/plan-eng-review/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 2
- 7-day trend score
- 10
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/ever-works/orgs/plan-eng-review)