fabriqaai/specs.md/walkthrough-generate

Claude Code and agent skill by fabriqaai/specs.md

Trust tier 2
  • community
LLM review pending
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Generate implementation walkthrough for human review after run completion. Documents decisions, changes, and verification steps.

Install

npx vskill@latest install fabriqaai/specs.md/walkthrough-generate

SKILL.md

<objective> Generate implementation walkthrough for human review after run completion. </objective>

<triggers>

  • Run completed successfully
  • Invoked by run-execute skill

</triggers>

<degrees_of_freedom> LOW — Follow walkthrough structure precisely. Be thorough but concise. </degrees_of_freedom>

<llm critical="true"> <mandate>ALWAYS generate walkthrough after run completion</mandate> <mandate>Document DECISIONS, not just changes</mandate> <mandate>Include verification steps — how to test this works</mandate> <mandate>Track DEVIATIONS from plan — compare to original work item</mandate> <mandate>List ALL new dependencies added during implementation</mandate> <mandate>Capture developer notes — gotchas save future debugging time</mandate> </llm>

<flow> <step n="1" title="Gather Implementation Data"> <action>Read run log from .specs-fire/runs/{run-id}/run.md</action> <action>Read work item plan from .specs-fire/intents/{intent}/work-items/{work-item}/</action> <action>Collect:</action> <substep>Work item details (id, title, intent)</substep> <substep>Files created during implementation</substep> <substep>Files modified during implementation</substep> <substep>Decisions made during execution</substep> <substep>Tests added and coverage</substep> <substep>Dependencies added (new packages in package.json, requirements.txt, etc.)</substep> <substep>Deviations from the original work item plan</substep> </step>

<step n="2" title="Analyze Implementation"> <action>For each file created/modified:</action> <substep>Identify purpose of the file</substep> <substep>Summarize key changes</substep> <substep>Note patterns or approaches used</substep> <action>Document structure overview:</action> <substep>How the pieces fit together architecturally</substep> <substep>Data flow or component relationships</substep> <substep>Keep high-level, NO CODE</substep> <action>Identify architecture pattern (if multi-component):</action> <substep>Pattern used (Repository, Service Layer, MVC, Clean Architecture, etc.)</substep> <substep>Layer structure diagram (ASCII) if applicable</substep> <action>Document domain model (if entities/models created):</action> <substep>Entities with properties and business rules</substep> <substep>Value objects with constraints</substep> </step>

<step n="3" title="Document Key Details"> <action>Extract implementation highlights:</action> <substep>Main flow/algorithm implemented</substep> <substep>Integration points with existing code</substep> <action>Document security considerations (if applicable):</action> <substep>Authentication/authorization approach</substep> <substep>Input validation strategy</substep> <substep>Data protection measures</substep> <substep>Format as table: Concern | Approach</substep> <action>Document performance considerations (if applicable):</action> <substep>Optimization strategies used</substep> <substep>Caching, indexing, or query optimization</substep> <substep>Scalability approach</substep> <substep>Format as table: Requirement | Implementation</substep> <action>Document deviations from plan:</action> <substep>Compare implementation to original work item plan</substep> <substep>Note any changes and explain WHY they were made</substep> <substep>If no deviations, state "None"</substep> <action>Capture developer notes:</action> <substep>Gotchas or non-obvious behaviors</substep> <substep>Tips for future developers</substep> <substep>Context that would save debugging time</substep> </step>

<step n="4" title="Create Verification Steps"> <action>Generate how-to-verify section:</action> <substep>Commands to run the feature</substep> <substep>Expected behavior/output</substep> <substep>Manual test scenarios</substep> </step>

<step n="5" title="Assess Ready for Review"> <action>Evaluate implementation completeness:</action> <substep>All acceptance criteria met?</substep> <substep>Tests passing?</substep> <substep>No critical issues remaining?</substep> <substep>Documentation updated (if applicable)?</substep> <substep>Developer notes captured?</substep> <action>Generate checklist with [x] for met, [ ] for unmet</action> </step>

<step n="6" title="Generate Walkthrough"> <action>Generate walkthrough using template: templates/walkthrough.md.hbs</action> <action>Include all sections (conditional sections only if data exists):</action> <substep>Architecture — only if multi-component with clear pattern</substep> <substep>Domain Model — only if entities/value objects created</substep> <substep>Security Considerations — only if security-relevant changes</substep> <substep>Performance Considerations — only if performance-relevant changes</substep> <action>Save to: .specs-fire/runs/{run-id}/walkthrough.md</action> <output> Walkthrough generated: .specs-fire/runs/{run-id}/walkthrough.md </output> </step> </flow>

<output_template> Walkthrough (.specs-fire/runs/{run-id}/walkthrough.md):

````markdown


run: {run-id} work_item: {work-item-id} intent: {intent-id} generated: {timestamp} mode: {mode}


# Implementation Walkthrough: {title}

## Summary

{2-3 sentences describing what was implemented}

## Structure Overview

{High-level description of how pieces fit together - NO CODE}

## Architecture (if multi-component)

### Pattern Used {Pattern and rationale - e.g., Repository pattern for data access abstraction}

### Layer Structure ``text ┌─────────────────────────────┐ │ Presentation │ ├─────────────────────────────┤ │ Application │ ├─────────────────────────────┤ │ Domain │ ├─────────────────────────────┤ │ Infrastructure │ └─────────────────────────────┘ ``

Files Changed

Created
FilePurpose
{path}{purpose}
Modified
FileChanges
{path}{changes}

Domain Model (if entities created)

Entities
EntityPropertiesBusiness Rules
{name}{props}{rules}
Value Objects
Value ObjectPropertiesConstraints
{name}{props}{constraints}

Key Implementation Details

1. {Detail Title}

{description of implementation approach}

Security Considerations (if applicable)

ConcernApproach
{concern}{approach}

Performance Considerations (if applicable)

RequirementImplementation
{requirement}{implementation}

Decisions Made

DecisionChoiceRationale
{decision}{choice}{rationale}

Deviations from Plan

{Changes from work item plan and why, or "None"}

Dependencies Added

PackageWhy Needed
{package}{reason}

How to Verify

  1. {Step Title}

``bash {command} ``

Expected: {expected output}

Test Coverage

  • Tests added: {count}
  • Coverage: {percentage}%
  • Status: {passing/failing}

Ready for Review

  • [x] All acceptance criteria met
  • [x] Tests passing
  • [x] No critical issues
  • [ ] Documentation updated (if applicable)
  • [x] Developer notes captured

Developer Notes

{Gotchas, tips, or context for future work - keep brief}


Generated by specs.md - fabriqa.ai FIRE Flow Run {run-id}

````

</output_template>

<success_criteria> <criterion>Walkthrough generated with all applicable sections</criterion> <criterion>Structure overview explains architecture (NO CODE)</criterion> <criterion>Architecture pattern documented (if multi-component)</criterion> <criterion>Domain model documented (if entities created)</criterion> <criterion>Files changed documented with purposes</criterion> <criterion>Security considerations documented (if security-relevant)</criterion> <criterion>Performance considerations documented (if performance-relevant)</criterion> <criterion>Decisions recorded with rationale</criterion> <criterion>Deviations from plan documented (or "None")</criterion> <criterion>Dependencies added listed with reasons</criterion> <criterion>Verification steps included</criterion> <criterion>Ready for Review checklist completed</criterion> <criterion>Developer notes capture gotchas and tips</criterion> <criterion>Saved to run folder</criterion> </success_criteria>

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
82
Repository forks
7
7-day trend score
22

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Refreshed 21 Mar 2026, 7 months ago.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/fabriqaai/specs.md/walkthrough-generate/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/fabriqaai/specs.md/walkthrough-generate)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.