feiyang-k/curation-bench/alpaca-a-strong-replicable-instruction-following-model-stanford-alpaca-2023

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Install

npx vskill@latest install feiyang-k/curation-bench/alpaca-a-strong-replicable-instruction-following-model-stanford-alpaca-2023

SKILL.md

Alpaca: A Strong, Replicable Instruction-Following Model

One-line decision

Use this skill when you want to distill instruction-following capability from a strong LLM to a weaker one using 52K generated instruction samples. Avoid it when you can directly use the strong LLM or have human-written instructions.

Skill metadata

  • Skill type: instruction-data-distillation
  • Paper kind: operational-method
  • Actionability: high
  • Evidence quality: full_paper

Goal

Distill instruction-following capability from GPT-3.5 to LLaMA-7B by generating 52K instruction-following samples using the Self-Instruct approach.

Problem signature

  • Modality: text instruction-response pairs generated by GPT-3.5.
  • Data state: 52K instruction samples generated by GPT-3.5 from 175 seeds.
  • Scale regime: 52K instruction-response pairs.
  • Model requirement: GPT-3.5 for generation; LLaMA-7B for fine-tuning.

Use when

  • You want to create instruction data cheaply using a strong LLM.
  • You need to fine-tune a smaller model for instruction following.
  • You want a cost-effective alternative to human annotation.

Do not use when

  • You can use the strong LLM directly.
  • You have abundant human-annotated instruction data.
  • You need domain expertise the LLM lacks.

Required inputs

  • strong_llm: GPT-3.5 or equivalent for generating instruction data.
  • seed_instructions: 175 seed instruction tasks.
  • base_model: LLaMA-7B or equivalent for fine-tuning.

Optional inputs

  • quality_filter: Filter for removing low-quality generated instructions.

Outputs

  • alpaca_data: 52K instruction-response pairs from GPT-3.5.
  • alpaca_model: LLaMA-7B fine-tuned on the generated data.

Assumptions and prerequisites

  • Strong LLM outputs provide effective supervision for smaller models.
  • 52K samples are sufficient for basic instruction following.
  • The Self-Instruct approach scales to production quality.

Procedure

  1. Generate instructions with GPT-3.5

Action: Use GPT-3.5 to generate 52K instruction-response pairs following Self-Instruct. Why: GPT-3.5 produces reasonable quality instruction data. Note: See paper for details.

  1. Quality filter

Action: Remove obviously low-quality or malformed samples. Why: Basic filtering improves data quality. Note: See paper for details.

  1. Fine-tune LLaMA-7B

Action: Fine-tune the base LLaMA model on the 52K samples. Why: Creates an instruction-following model. Note: See paper for details.

  1. Evaluate instruction following

Action: Test on instruction-following benchmarks. Why: Validates the distillation quality. Note: See paper for details.

Parameters to set

  • generation_cost — Role: API cost for generating data. How to set: ~$500 for 52K samples with GPT-3.5. Default/range: ~$500. Effect: Very cost-effective compared to human annotation.
  • sample_count — Role: Number of instruction samples. How to set: 52K for basic instruction following. Default/range: 52K. Effect: More samples improve instruction diversity.

Validation checks

  • The fine-tuned model should follow diverse instructions.
  • Quality should approach that of the teacher model on simple tasks.
  • The approach should be reproducible at low cost.

Failure modes

  • Generated data inherits biases from GPT-3.5.
  • 52K samples may not cover complex instruction types.
  • The quality gap between teacher and student may be significant for hard tasks.

Adaptation notes for VLM training

  • The Alpaca recipe has been widely replicated for VLM instruction data.
  • Replace GPT-3.5 with Claude for data generation.
  • Scale to more data for improved instruction following.

Implementation notes

  • Use the Alpaca data generation code for reproducibility.
  • Monitor per-task quality during fine-tuning.
  • Compare against the teacher model on diverse tasks.

Evidence from the paper

  • Alpaca creates an instruction-following LLaMA-7B for ~$500 in API costs.
  • 52K GPT-3.5-generated samples enable reasonable instruction following.
  • The approach demonstrates cost-effective LLM distillation.
  • Alpaca has inspired numerous open-source instruction-tuning efforts.

Source paper

  • Title: Alpaca: A Strong, Replicable Instruction-Following Model
  • Year: 2023
  • Venue: Stanford
  • Paper ID: stanford-alpaca-2023
  • URL: https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/03/13/alpaca.html
  • arXiv ID: N/A

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
10
7-day trend score
0

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/feiyang-k/curation-bench/alpaca-a-strong-replicable-instruction-following-model-stanford-alpaca-2023/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/feiyang-k/curation-bench/alpaca-a-strong-replicable-instruction-following-model-stanford-alpaca-2023)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.