feiyang-k/curation-bench/blink-multimodal-large-language-models-can-see-but-not-perceive-arxiv-2404-12390v2

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Install

npx vskill@latest install feiyang-k/curation-bench/blink-multimodal-large-language-models-can-see-but-not-perceive-arxiv-2404-12390v2

SKILL.md

BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive

One-line decision

Use this skill when you need a benchmark revealing perception gaps in VLMs — tasks that are trivially easy for humans but hard for models. Avoid it when standard VLM benchmarks show sufficient performance.

Skill metadata

  • Skill type: visual-perception-gap-benchmark
  • Paper kind: operational-method
  • Actionability: high
  • Evidence quality: full_paper

Goal

Create a benchmark that reveals visual perception gaps in VLMs — tasks that are trivially easy for humans (one blink) but surprisingly challenging for state-of-the-art VLMs.

Problem signature

  • Modality: images with perception tasks easy for humans but hard for VLMs.
  • Data state: 3,807 carefully curated perception challenge examples.
  • Scale regime: 3,807 diagnostic examples.
  • Model requirement: Any VLM for evaluation.

Use when

  • You want to find perception gaps in VLMs.
  • You need tasks where VLMs fail despite human ease.
  • You want diagnostic rather than performance evaluation.

Do not use when

  • Standard performance benchmarks are sufficient.
  • You do not need to identify perception gaps.
  • Your VLM already handles basic perception well.

Required inputs

  • perception_challenges: 3,807 curated visual perception examples.
  • human_baselines: Human performance on the examples.
  • vlm_to_evaluate: VLM for evaluation.

Optional inputs

  • difficulty_analysis: Per-task difficulty analysis.

Outputs

  • blink_scores: VLM performance on perception challenges.
  • gap_analysis: Analysis of human-VLM perception gaps.

Assumptions and prerequisites

  • VLMs have significant perception gaps despite high benchmark scores.
  • Human-easy tasks reveal fundamental model limitations.
  • Understanding gaps guides training data improvement.

Procedure

  1. Curate perception challenges

Action: Create 3,807 examples easy for humans but challenging for VLMs. Why: Reveals perception gaps. Note: See paper for details.

  1. Establish human baselines

Action: Measure human performance on the challenges. Why: Human comparison contextualizes VLM gaps. Note: See paper for details.

  1. Evaluate VLMs

Action: Test state-of-the-art VLMs on BLINK. Why: Identifies specific perception failures. Note: See paper for details.

  1. Analyze gaps

Action: Determine which perception types VLMs fail on. Why: Guides targeted improvement. Note: See paper for details.

Parameters to set

  • challenge_types — Role: Types of perception challenges. How to set: Include spatial, temporal, counting, depth, etc. Default/range: 14 task types. Effect: More types reveal more gaps.
  • difficulty_calibration — Role: How difficulty is calibrated. How to set: Easy for humans, variable for VLMs. Default/range: Human-easy. Effect: Ensures gaps are meaningful.

Validation checks

  • Human performance should be very high (near-ceiling).
  • VLM performance should be significantly lower.
  • The gap should indicate genuine perception limitations.

Failure modes

  • Some challenges may be ambiguous even for humans.
  • The gap may narrow as VLMs improve.
  • 3,807 examples may not cover all perception types.

Adaptation notes for VLM training

  • BLINK reveals which training data types are missing for VLM perception.
  • Perception gaps guide data curation for visual understanding.
  • Addressing BLINK failures requires targeted training data.

Implementation notes

  • Use the BLINK evaluation framework.
  • Report human-VLM gap per task type.
  • Prioritize addressing the largest gaps.

Evidence from the paper

  • BLINK reveals that VLMs can see but not perceive many visual properties.
  • Tasks trivially easy for humans are challenging for state-of-the-art VLMs.
  • The benchmark identifies 14 types of perception gaps.
  • Understanding gaps guides targeted VLM improvement.

Source paper

  • Title: BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive
  • Year: 2024
  • Venue: ECCV
  • Paper ID: arxiv-2404.12390v2
  • URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12390v2
  • arXiv ID: 2404.12390v2

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

7-day trend score
0

Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/feiyang-k/curation-bench/blink-multimodal-large-language-models-can-see-but-not-perceive-arxiv-2404-12390v2/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/feiyang-k/curation-bench/blink-multimodal-large-language-models-can-see-but-not-perceive-arxiv-2404-12390v2)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.