feiyang-k/curation-bench/blink-multimodal-large-language-models-can-see-but-not-perceive-arxiv-2404-12390v2
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Install
npx vskill@latest install feiyang-k/curation-bench/blink-multimodal-large-language-models-can-see-but-not-perceive-arxiv-2404-12390v2SKILL.md
BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive
One-line decision
Use this skill when you need a benchmark revealing perception gaps in VLMs — tasks that are trivially easy for humans but hard for models. Avoid it when standard VLM benchmarks show sufficient performance.
Skill metadata
- Skill type: visual-perception-gap-benchmark
- Paper kind: operational-method
- Actionability: high
- Evidence quality: full_paper
Goal
Create a benchmark that reveals visual perception gaps in VLMs — tasks that are trivially easy for humans (one blink) but surprisingly challenging for state-of-the-art VLMs.
Problem signature
- Modality: images with perception tasks easy for humans but hard for VLMs.
- Data state: 3,807 carefully curated perception challenge examples.
- Scale regime: 3,807 diagnostic examples.
- Model requirement: Any VLM for evaluation.
Use when
- You want to find perception gaps in VLMs.
- You need tasks where VLMs fail despite human ease.
- You want diagnostic rather than performance evaluation.
Do not use when
- Standard performance benchmarks are sufficient.
- You do not need to identify perception gaps.
- Your VLM already handles basic perception well.
Required inputs
- perception_challenges: 3,807 curated visual perception examples.
- human_baselines: Human performance on the examples.
- vlm_to_evaluate: VLM for evaluation.
Optional inputs
- difficulty_analysis: Per-task difficulty analysis.
Outputs
- blink_scores: VLM performance on perception challenges.
- gap_analysis: Analysis of human-VLM perception gaps.
Assumptions and prerequisites
- VLMs have significant perception gaps despite high benchmark scores.
- Human-easy tasks reveal fundamental model limitations.
- Understanding gaps guides training data improvement.
Procedure
- Curate perception challenges
Action: Create 3,807 examples easy for humans but challenging for VLMs. Why: Reveals perception gaps. Note: See paper for details.
- Establish human baselines
Action: Measure human performance on the challenges. Why: Human comparison contextualizes VLM gaps. Note: See paper for details.
- Evaluate VLMs
Action: Test state-of-the-art VLMs on BLINK. Why: Identifies specific perception failures. Note: See paper for details.
- Analyze gaps
Action: Determine which perception types VLMs fail on. Why: Guides targeted improvement. Note: See paper for details.
Parameters to set
- challenge_types — Role: Types of perception challenges. How to set: Include spatial, temporal, counting, depth, etc. Default/range: 14 task types. Effect: More types reveal more gaps.
- difficulty_calibration — Role: How difficulty is calibrated. How to set: Easy for humans, variable for VLMs. Default/range: Human-easy. Effect: Ensures gaps are meaningful.
Validation checks
- Human performance should be very high (near-ceiling).
- VLM performance should be significantly lower.
- The gap should indicate genuine perception limitations.
Failure modes
- Some challenges may be ambiguous even for humans.
- The gap may narrow as VLMs improve.
- 3,807 examples may not cover all perception types.
Adaptation notes for VLM training
- BLINK reveals which training data types are missing for VLM perception.
- Perception gaps guide data curation for visual understanding.
- Addressing BLINK failures requires targeted training data.
Implementation notes
- Use the BLINK evaluation framework.
- Report human-VLM gap per task type.
- Prioritize addressing the largest gaps.
Evidence from the paper
- BLINK reveals that VLMs can see but not perceive many visual properties.
- Tasks trivially easy for humans are challenging for state-of-the-art VLMs.
- The benchmark identifies 14 types of perception gaps.
- Understanding gaps guides targeted VLM improvement.
Source paper
- Title: BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive
- Year: 2024
- Venue: ECCV
- Paper ID: arxiv-2404.12390v2
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12390v2
- arXiv ID: 2404.12390v2
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/data-acquisition/blink-multimodal-large-language-models-can-see-but-not-perceive-arxiv-2404-12390v2/SKILL.md
Popularity
- 7-day trend score
- 0
Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/feiyang-k/curation-bench/blink-multimodal-large-language-models-can-see-but-not-perceive-arxiv-2404-12390v2)