Skill v1.0.0
currentAutomated scan100/100version: "1.0.0" name: pricing-analysis description: >- Analyze a company's pricing and packaging from its pricing page — tiers, value metric, anchoring and decoy effects, good-better-best structure, gating, discounts, and monetization gaps — and recommend improvements. Use when the user shares a pricing page or asks to "analyze pricing", "review their plans", "is this priced right", "improve our packaging", or compares pricing across competitors. license: MIT metadata: author: fjilvi-afk version: "1.0" category: competitive
Pricing & Packaging Analysis
Decode how a company prices and packages — and where they're leaving money onthe table or scaring buyers away.
What it does
Breaks down a pricing page into its mechanics — the value metric, tier structure, psychological devices, and gating logic — then evaluates how well the pricing matches the buyer and recommends concrete changes. Works for a single company or a side-by-side comparison of several.
When to use this skill
- "Analyze this pricing page: <url>."
- "Is our pricing right? Here are our plans."
- "Compare pricing for <A> vs <B> vs <C>."
- Designing or auditing packaging, tiers, or a price increase.
Inputs needed
- Required: the pricing page URL(s), or the plans/prices pasted in.
- Helpful: the target customer, the product's main value metric, the user's
goal (raise ARPU, reduce friction, move upmarket), and competitor prices.
- If pricing is "contact sales" with nothing public, analyze the strategy that
implies and ask for any figures the user has.
Method
- Inventory — list every plan: name, price, billing cadence, what's included,
limits, and the headline benefit of each.
- Find the value metric — what does price scale on (seats, usage, contacts,
revenue, flat)? Is it aligned with the value the customer gets and growth?
- Read the structure — Good-Better-Best? How many tiers? Is there a clear
"most popular" anchor and an enterprise/contact tier as the upper anchor?
- Spot the psychology — anchoring, decoy tier, charm pricing, annual
discount framing, urgency, "save X%", free tier/trial as acquisition.
- Check gating — are the right features gated to drive upgrades, or are key
features locked too early (friction) or given away too freely (left money)?
- Assess fit — does the entry price match the ICP's willingness to pay? Is
there a gap between free and the first paid tier (the "leap")?
- Recommend — specific changes: re-tiering, value-metric change, anchor
additions, gating moves, packaging simplification. Prioritize by impact/effort.
Output format
# Pricing Analysis — <Company>## TL;DR-The value metric, the structure, and the single biggest pricing opportunity.## Plan inventory| Plan | Price | Billing | Value metric | Key inclusions / limits | Apparent target ||------|-------|---------|--------------|-------------------------|-----------------|## Structure & psychology-Tier model (e.g. Good-Better-Best):-Anchors (most-popular / enterprise):-Devices observed (decoy, charm, annual discount, urgency):## Gating & monetization-What's gated where, and whether it drives upgrades:-Free → first paid "leap":## Fit with the buyer-Entry price vs ICP willingness-to-pay:-Where pricing creates friction or leaves money on the table:## Recommendations| # | Recommendation | Why (finding) | Impact | Effort ||---|----------------|---------------|--------|--------|
(For a comparison, add a matrix: rows = companies, columns = entry price, value metric, # tiers, free option, annual discount, enterprise tier.)
Quality bar
- Quote prices exactly as shown, with currency and cadence. Note the capture date.
- Separate observed structure from your recommendations.
- No invented willingness-to-pay or conversion numbers — reason qualitatively.
- Every recommendation references a specific finding.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Saying "too expensive / too cheap" without tying it to the buyer and value.
- Ignoring the value metric (the highest-leverage pricing decision).
- Recommending more tiers when the problem is an unclear anchor.