<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentAutomated scan100/100
fjilvvi/growthlens/pricing-analysis
──Details
PublishedSeptember 28, 2026 at 05:48 PM
Content Hashsha256:297847f239b4f4b6...
Git SHA
──Files
Files (1 file, 4.2 KB)
SKILL.md4.2 KBactive
SKILL.md · 107 lines · 4.2 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: pricing-analysis description: >- Analyze a company's pricing and packaging from its pricing page — tiers, value metric, anchoring and decoy effects, good-better-best structure, gating, discounts, and monetization gaps — and recommend improvements. Use when the user shares a pricing page or asks to "analyze pricing", "review their plans", "is this priced right", "improve our packaging", or compares pricing across competitors. license: MIT metadata: author: fjilvi-afk version: "1.0" category: competitive


Pricing & Packaging Analysis

Decode how a company prices and packages — and where they're leaving money on
the table or scaring buyers away.

What it does

Breaks down a pricing page into its mechanics — the value metric, tier structure, psychological devices, and gating logic — then evaluates how well the pricing matches the buyer and recommends concrete changes. Works for a single company or a side-by-side comparison of several.

When to use this skill

  • "Analyze this pricing page: <url>."
  • "Is our pricing right? Here are our plans."
  • "Compare pricing for <A> vs <B> vs <C>."
  • Designing or auditing packaging, tiers, or a price increase.

Inputs needed

  • Required: the pricing page URL(s), or the plans/prices pasted in.
  • Helpful: the target customer, the product's main value metric, the user's

goal (raise ARPU, reduce friction, move upmarket), and competitor prices.

  • If pricing is "contact sales" with nothing public, analyze the strategy that

implies and ask for any figures the user has.

Method

  1. Inventory — list every plan: name, price, billing cadence, what's included,

limits, and the headline benefit of each.

  1. Find the value metric — what does price scale on (seats, usage, contacts,

revenue, flat)? Is it aligned with the value the customer gets and growth?

  1. Read the structure — Good-Better-Best? How many tiers? Is there a clear

"most popular" anchor and an enterprise/contact tier as the upper anchor?

  1. Spot the psychology — anchoring, decoy tier, charm pricing, annual

discount framing, urgency, "save X%", free tier/trial as acquisition.

  1. Check gating — are the right features gated to drive upgrades, or are key

features locked too early (friction) or given away too freely (left money)?

  1. Assess fit — does the entry price match the ICP's willingness to pay? Is

there a gap between free and the first paid tier (the "leap")?

  1. Recommend — specific changes: re-tiering, value-metric change, anchor

additions, gating moves, packaging simplification. Prioritize by impact/effort.

Output format

markdown
# Pricing Analysis — <Company>
## TL;DR
-The value metric, the structure, and the single biggest pricing opportunity.
## Plan inventory
| Plan | Price | Billing | Value metric | Key inclusions / limits | Apparent target |
|------|-------|---------|--------------|-------------------------|-----------------|
## Structure & psychology
-Tier model (e.g. Good-Better-Best):
-Anchors (most-popular / enterprise):
-Devices observed (decoy, charm, annual discount, urgency):
## Gating & monetization
-What's gated where, and whether it drives upgrades:
-Free → first paid "leap":
## Fit with the buyer
-Entry price vs ICP willingness-to-pay:
-Where pricing creates friction or leaves money on the table:
## Recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Why (finding) | Impact | Effort |
|---|----------------|---------------|--------|--------|

(For a comparison, add a matrix: rows = companies, columns = entry price, value metric, # tiers, free option, annual discount, enterprise tier.)

Quality bar

  • Quote prices exactly as shown, with currency and cadence. Note the capture date.
  • Separate observed structure from your recommendations.
  • No invented willingness-to-pay or conversion numbers — reason qualitatively.
  • Every recommendation references a specific finding.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Saying "too expensive / too cheap" without tying it to the buyer and value.
  • Ignoring the value metric (the highest-leverage pricing decision).
  • Recommending more tiers when the problem is an unclear anchor.
All versions