<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentAutomated scan100/100
florianbruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide/plan-pipeline
──Details
PublishedAugust 13, 2026 at 12:37 PM
Content Hashsha256:beaf5d8e7f26c181...
Git SHA752edfe5ca63
──Files
Files (1 file, 2.9 KB)
SKILL.md2.9 KBactive
SKILL.md · 72 lines · 2.9 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: plan-pipeline description: "Orchestrates the complete planning pipeline: product direction (ceo-review) -> architecture (eng-review) -> implementation plan (start) -> validation (validate) -> execution (execute). Run stages individually or let the orchestrator coordinate the full flow." allowed-tools: Read Write Bash Task effort: high


Plan pipeline orchestrator

Orchestrates the complete plan-to-execution pipeline. Can run the full pipeline or a single isolated stage.

Stages

StageSkillPurpose
1/plan-pipeline:ceo-reviewChallenge the brief, lock product direction
2/plan-pipeline:eng-reviewLock architecture, diagrams, and test matrix
3/plan-pipeline:start5-phase planning: PRD, research, ADRs, task list
4/plan-pipeline:validate2-layer validation before any code is written
5/plan-pipeline:executeWorktree isolation, parallel agents, quality gate, PR

Usage

/plan-pipeline # full pipeline, asks for context
/plan-pipeline --from=start # skip gates, start from planning phase
/plan-pipeline --from=validate # validate an existing plan
/plan-pipeline --from=execute # execute a validated plan

When to use each stage

ceo-review: use before any significant feature when the direction is not locked. Especially valuable when the request is specific (specificity signals collapsed solution space).

eng-review: use after direction is locked. Required for features with async components, external dependencies, or multi-step flows.

start: use for any non-trivial feature touching more than 2 files or involving architecture decisions.

validate: always before execute. The cost of validation is negligible against the cost of discovering issues mid-execution.

execute: after validate confirms all issues are resolved.

Workflow

  1. Collect context: what are we building, and what stage do we start from?
  2. ceo-review: product direction gate (can be skipped with --from=eng-review or later)
  3. eng-review: architecture gate (can be skipped with --from=start or later)
  4. CHECKPOINT: ask user to confirm direction and architecture before planning
  5. start: run 5-phase planning, produce docs/plans/plan-{name}.md
  6. CHECKPOINT: present plan for review before validation
  7. validate: 2-layer validation (structural + specialist agents)
  8. execute: worktree isolation -> parallel agents -> quality gate -> PR

Dependency graph

ceo-review
|
eng-review
|
start
|
validate
|
execute

Notes

Each stage writes its output to disk before the next stage begins. If the pipeline is interrupted, resume with --from=<stage> using the correct stage name. All decisions are recorded in docs/plans/plan-{name}.md and the corresponding ADRs in docs/adr/.

All versions