<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentLLM-judged scan90/100
gal-tab/sir_albert/execute
──Details
PublishedOctober 22, 2026 at 12:41 PM
Content Hashsha256:2086e3c53675e440...
Git SHA4f1f062e8346
──Files
Files (1 file, 3.2 KB)
SKILL.md3.2 KBactive
SKILL.md · 69 lines · 3.2 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: execute description: Use when given a spec and tickets to implement, when asked to "work the tickets", "implement this spec", "execute the plan", or "implement ticket NN". Reads spec + tickets, builds a task graph, dispatches Sonnet subagents to implement each unblocked ticket, and gates all irreversible actions.


execute

Boot from os/PREAMBLE.md.

Adapted from Pocock skills/in-progress/implement-spec (MIT); see THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md.

Announce on invocation: "I'm using the execute skill. Reading the spec and building the task graph."


Phase 1 — Read and build the task graph

  1. Read the spec (usually docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md).
  2. Read all ticket files (docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>/tickets/NN-<slug>.md).
  3. Build the task graph: map each ticket's Blocked by: edges to find the frontier — the set of tickets with no unmet blockers. These are ready to implement now.
  4. State the frontier out loud: "Frontier: tickets 01, 03, 06 (unblocked). Tickets 02, 04, 05 blocked by predecessors."

Phase 2 — Implement the frontier

For each unblocked ticket, launch an implementer subagent:

  • Model: Sonnet (explicitly; do not use Opus for implementation subagents)
  • Run in background where tickets are independent (no shared files)
  • Context: sparse pointers to spec path + ticket path + previous commit hashes. Do NOT duplicate ticket content in the subagent prompt.
  • Coordinator stays in main context to answer questions the subagent surfaces
  • When an implementer finishes, merge its work and re-evaluate the frontier

Worktrees and draft PR: optional — only create a branch + draft PR if the user requests it or the output is a code branch. Most of Gal's work (config, docs, analysis) does not need a PR. Skip unless asked.


CHECKPOINT gates (hard rules — cannot be skipped or auto-approved)

Stop and explicitly ask Gal before any of these actions. Do not proceed autonomously:

ActionWhy it's gated
git push / push to remoteIrreversible; affects shared state
gh pr create / open a PRExternal visibility
gh pr merge / merge PRCode goes to main; cannot un-merge easily
Live config apply (n8n, HubSpot, GTM, GA4)Affects production immediately
Deploy to productionSelf-explanatory
Any delete that clears dataIrreversible

Format for CHECKPOINT: "CHECKPOINT: I'm about to [action]. Shall I proceed? (Affects: [what changes])"


Phase 3 — Complete

  • If output is a code branch: run /sir-albert:build verification step (tests pass, no debug artifacts, PR description written). Then CHECKPOINT before pushing.
  • If output is not a code branch (docs, config, analysis): run the verification step from the spec's DOD. Show the output. Confirm it matches the spec.
  • Report: "All tickets implemented. Frontier is empty. Verification: [result]."

Communication rules

  • Subagents communicate via context pointers (spec path, ticket path, commit hash), not inline prose summaries.
  • Coordinator does not re-narrate what the subagent did. The commit history is the record.
  • If a subagent surfaces a question, the coordinator answers it inline and adds the decision to the relevant ticket file.
All versions