<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentAutomated scan100/100
gongshichen/luminacode/process-compliance-review
──Details
PublishedOctober 19, 2026 at 03:05 PM
Content Hashsha256:3b6de492662af02e...
Git SHA
──Files
Files (1 file, 2.1 KB)
SKILL.md2.1 KBactive
SKILL.md · 43 lines · 2.1 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: Process Compliance Review description: Review whether the product-development process and required artifacts were actually followed. when-to-use: Use during Reviewer gate before submitting a verdict. user-invocable: false context: inline


Review the work as a process and evidence audit, not just a code review.

Before reviewing:

  • Call GetTeamContext.
  • Use GetTeamContext.contract as the authoritative Team Acceptance Contract.
  • A standalone TEAM_ACCEPTANCE_CONTRACT.md is optional unless the runtime contract lists it in required_artifacts.

Required checks:

  • PRD.md exists and matches the user request.
  • UX_DESIGN.md exists and is based on the PRD.
  • BACKEND_PLAN.md and FRONTEND_PLAN.md exist and stay within their boundaries.
  • INTERFACE_CONTRACT.md exists and matches the implementation.
  • INTEGRATION_REPORT.md exists and proves real component integration.
  • QA_REPORT.md exists and includes required command evidence.
  • Implementation files are under the project root.
  • The parent working directory is clean for named-project tasks.
  • QA and Reviewer gate verdicts are submitted through runtime tools, not only described in prose.
  • Reviewer evidence collection stays within expected artifacts. A reviewer-created smoke script or helper file is a process violation unless it was declared as an expected artifact before the review task started.

Blocking findings:

  • Missing required document artifact.
  • Missing runtime Team Acceptance Contract when the team gates require one.
  • A contract document is listed in required_artifacts but is absent from both runtime artifacts and disk.
  • Any unresolved mismatch with an explicit user requirement, PRD acceptance criterion, UX requirement, or runtime contract item.
  • Frontend bypasses backend/API/storage contract.
  • Backend implements unused or incompatible contract.
  • Required verification command is skipped without a specific reason.
  • Security, data-loss, correctness, build-breaking, or architecture mismatch risk.

Write review evidence to <project_root>/REVIEW_REPORT.md and call SubmitGateVerdict.

All versions