<< All versions
Skill v1.0.0
currentAutomated scan100/100gongshichen/luminacode/qa-report
──Details
PublishedNovember 5, 2026 at 09:10 PM
Content Hashsha256:c0d6d8bc79f48af0...
Git SHA7c499726b0a8
──Files
Files (1 file, 2.3 KB)
SKILL.md2.3 KBactive
SKILL.md · 58 lines · 2.3 KB
name: QA Report description: Write a durable QA report with evidence, command results, unresolved findings, and verdict rationale. when-to-use: Use before submitting a QA gate verdict. user-invocable: false context: inline metadata: version: "1.0.0"
Write QA evidence as <project_root>/QA_REPORT.md.
Before writing:
- Call
GetTeamContextand use its runtimecontractas the authoritative Team Acceptance Contract. - Do not invent a missing-contract finding because there is no
TEAM_ACCEPTANCE_CONTRACT.mdfile. A file is required only if the runtime contract lists that file inrequired_artifacts. - Keep the report concise enough for repair: normally 80-180 lines for small/medium tasks.
Required sections:
- Scope verified
- User request summary.
- Runtime Team Acceptance Contract summary from
GetTeamContext. - Documents checked: PRD, UX design, plans, interface contract, integration report.
- Environment
- Working directory.
- Runtime/tool versions when relevant.
- Setup commands and services started.
- Command evidence
- Each required command from the Team Acceptance Contract.
- Exit status.
- Short stdout/stderr summary.
- Whether output proves the requirement.
- Integration evidence
- Real user-facing component path exercised.
- Backend/API/storage/tooling contract exercised.
- Positive, negative, and persistence checks where applicable.
- Parent workspace cleanliness
- Files present in the parent directory before/after when named-project work is used.
- Any byproducts and cleanup performed.
- Findings
- Blocking findings.
- Non-blocking findings.
- Deferred items and why they are safe.
- Any failure of an explicit user requirement, PRD acceptance criterion, UX requirement, or runtime contract item belongs in blocking findings. Examples include localized-error requirements, required exit-code semantics, required integration behavior, or required artifacts.
- Do not classify an explicit requirement violation as non-blocking just because the happy path works or the issue is common in a framework.
- Verdict
pass,fail, ornot_applicable.- Rationale and evidence references.
After writing the report, call SubmitGateVerdict and reference QA_REPORT.md in the evidence.