griffinhilly/claude-code-synthesis/review

Claude Code and agent skill by griffinhilly/claude-code-synthesis

Trust tier 2
  • community
LLM review pending
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Review completed work against success criteria and flag issues

Install

npx vskill@latest install griffinhilly/claude-code-synthesis/review

SKILL.md

Review

Evaluate completed work against its success criteria. Find problems before they compound.

Input

What to review: $ARGUMENTS

If no arguments, review whatever was most recently implemented in the conversation.

Process

Step 1: Pre-check
  • If /verify hasn't been run on the target, suggest running it first — /verify catches completeness issues, /review catches quality issues. Different concerns.
  • Read relevant COMP files (CLAUDE.md for conventions, MEMORY.md for gotchas)
  • Identify the success criteria (from /plan-task output, PLAN.md, or conversation)
Step 2: Launch Review

Read ~/.claude/skills/review/review-dimensions.md for what to check based on the type of work (code, data, writing).

Launch the review using a fresh-context subagent (use the code-reviewer agent persona for code). Apply the strengthened review discipline (per CLAUDE.md "Fresh eyes for review"):

  1. Spec-blind: Do NOT include the original spec, plan, or coder context in the reviewer's prompt. Pass the diff (or the artifact) and have the reviewer reason backward. The reviewer's lack of spec-knowledge is a feature — it surfaces unstated assumptions the spec hid.
  2. Multiple uncorrelated passes: Launch the reviewer 2-3 times in parallel with the same prompt. Union their findings. If the same model produces overlapping findings, that's signal; if they find different things, the union is the value.
  3. Treat-as-adversary: Frame the reviewer's findings as questions about the work, not defects to auto-fix. Pass each finding through "is this actually wrong, or is it the reviewer pattern-matching without context?" Keep the credible ones; reject the rest with reasoning.
Step 3: Present Findings

Read ~/.claude/skills/review/output-format.md for how to organize findings.

Step 4: Escalation Check
  • For significant reviews, consider suggesting /dialectic-review for adversarial depth
  • If the review surfaces architectural concerns, suggest /dialectic-review --premortem before proceeding with fixes

Rules

Read ~/.claude/skills/review/rules.md for review rules and gotchas.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

7-day trend score
5

Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/griffinhilly/claude-code-synthesis/review/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/griffinhilly/claude-code-synthesis/review)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.