h30190/hjplus_taiwan_architect_kb/public-review

Claude Code and agent skill by h30190/hjplus_taiwan_architect_kb

Trust tier 2
  • community
LLM review pending
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

This skill should be used when an architect needs to understand Taiwan's public review (公開閱覽) procedures for government procurement, including how to review tender documents, provide professional feedback, and evaluate project opportunities before formal bidding.

Install

npx vskill@latest install h30190/hjplus_taiwan_architect_kb/public-review

SKILL.md

Public Review (公開閱覽)

This skill covers Taiwan's public review (公開閱覽) process under the Government Procurement Act, a pre-tender procedure where procurement documents are made available for industry feedback. Invoke this skill when reviewing upcoming procurement opportunities, preparing feedback on tender documents, or evaluating whether to participate in subsequent formal bidding.


Section 1: Legal Framework

1.1 Governing Provisions
LawArticleContent
Government Procurement Act (政府採購法)Art. 34Public review requirements for tender documents
Enforcement RulesArt. 43Detailed procedures for public review process
Public Construction Technical Service Contract TemplateFull textStandard contract clauses reference
1.2 When Public Review is Required
ConditionRequirement
Above announcement threshold (≧ NTD 1,000,000)May conduct public review
Complex or large-scale projectsRecommended by PCC guidelines
Projects with novel technical requirementsRecommended to reduce disputes
Above audit threshold (≧ NTD 50,000,000)Strongly recommended

Section 2: Public Review Process

2.1 Process Flow
1. Publication
└─ Procuring entity posts notice on Government e-Procurement System
└─ Documents made available for download/inspection
2. Review Period
└─ Typically 5-7 working days
└─ Minimum period per PCC guidelines
3. Feedback Submission
└─ Written comments submitted by interested parties
└─ Format: per procuring entity requirements (usually written/email)
4. Agency Response
└─ Procuring entity compiles all feedback
└─ Public response to each comment (accepted/rejected with rationale)
5. Document Revision
└─ Tender documents revised based on accepted feedback
└─ Revision history documented
6. Formal Tender
└─ Revised documents used for formal bidding process

Section 3: Key Review Areas for Architects

3.1 Document Review Checklist
AreaWhat to CheckCommon Issues
Scope DefinitionClear work items, deliverablesAmbiguous scope, missing items
Fee CalculationAlignment with official fee standardsBelow-standard fees, unclear payment schedule
Design TimelineReasonable duration per project complexityUnrealistic deadlines
Evaluation CriteriaWeight distribution, objectivityOver-emphasis on price vs. quality
Contract TermsRisk allocation, liability clausesUnfair risk transfer to service provider
Penalty ClausesDelay penalties, liquidated damagesExcessive penalty rates
Technical RequirementsSpecifications clarityRestrictive specs limiting competition
3.2 Feedback Categories
CategoryPriorityExample
Legal complianceHighContract clause contradicts Procurement Act
Fee adequacyHighFee below 機關委託技術服務廠商計費標準 minimum
Timeline feasibilityHighDesign period insufficient for required regulatory reviews
Risk allocationMediumUnfair force majeure clause
Technical clarityMediumAmbiguous performance specifications
Competition fairnessMediumSpecs written for specific vendor

Section 4: Strategic Considerations

4.1 Benefits of Participation
  • Influence tender conditions before they become binding
  • Early insight into upcoming project opportunities
  • Build relationship with procuring entities
  • Demonstrate expertise and market awareness
4.2 Best Practices
PracticeRationale
Submit specific, actionable feedbackGeneric complaints are less likely to result in changes
Reference official standards and regulationsStrengthens the basis for requested changes
Coordinate through professional associations (建築師公會)Collective feedback carries more weight
Maintain written records of all submissionsDocumentation for potential future disputes
Attend pre-bid meetings if offeredAdditional context beyond written documents

Section 5: MCP Tool Integration

python
# Search Government Procurement Act provisions on public review
taiwan-building-code_search_building_code(query="政府採購法 公開閱覽")
# Search interpretations on tender document requirements
taiwan-building-code_search_building_interpretations(query="招標文件 公開閱覽")
# Download procurement-related specifications
pcc-downloader_download_specification(chapter="procurement", keyword="公開閱覽", format="pdf")

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
36
Repository forks
48
7-day trend score
18

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/h30190/hjplus_taiwan_architect_kb/public-review/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/h30190/hjplus_taiwan_architect_kb/public-review)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.