hanamizuki/solopreneur/handoff

Handoff

Package the current session into a portable, self-contained markdown document so a fresh agent — in a new Claude Code session, Codex, ChatGPT, or running on another machine — can pick up the work without asking the user clarifying questions.

The document is printed inline AND saved to /tmp/handoff/<YYYY-MM-DD>_<slug>.md (e.g. /tmp/handoff/2026-06-01_fix-portfolio-cost-basis.md). The user can copy from the terminal or grab the file directly.

When this is the right tool

Use it when the user is about to switch sessions, run something on a different machine, or hand off to a teammate's agent, and the new agent needs to know what's done, what's next, what NOT to relitigate, and what dead ends to skip.

Not the right tool when:

• The user wants a git worktree created — use worktree-handoff instead.
• The user wants a recap of what just happened. Handoff is forward-looking;

a recap is retrospective.

Flow

1. Decide whether the next step is clear

The most load-bearing field in the document is Next step. Three cases:

When asking, present the realistic forks ("Will the next session (a) just analyse the existing results, or (b) run the next iteration end-to-end? Each needs different scope and different env."), not open-ended ("What's next?").

2. Gather context

Run the gathering commands in parallel. Collect liberally; filter aggressively in step 3 — only ship what's relevant to continuing.

Environment

• pwd
• git rev-parse --show-toplevel
• git branch --show-current
• git status -s
• git log --oneline -10
• Background processes / dev servers / tunnels started in this session

From conversation history

• Files modified (Edit / Write tool calls) — path + what changed + why
• Files read for context that the new agent will also need to read — path + what's in them
• Significant Bash commands — and which the new agent should re-run vs. treat as already done
• Decisions the user committed to — design choices, accepted trade-offs
• Approaches tried and ruled out with the reason — saves the new agent from repeating mistakes
• Open questions or things blocked on user input
• Env vars or credentials referenced — by name only, never the value

3. Print the document

Use the structure below. Omit any section that has nothing meaningful — a missing section is better than a padded one.

# <Concrete task title> — Handoff Context
 
> For a fresh agent in a new session continuing this work. Read top-down —
> this is intended to be self-contained.
 
## Goal
<1–3 sentences. What to accomplish and why.>
 
## Current state
<Where the work stands right now. What infrastructure / data / branches are in place.>
 
## Next step
<One concrete action. Include exact command, absolute file path, and the
decision the user already made about it.>
 
## Decisions already made (do not relitigate)
-<decision> — <one-line reason>
 
## Tried and ruled out
-<approach> — <why it didn't work, so the new agent doesn't repeat it>
 
## Open questions / awaiting user
-<question> — <why it matters / what it blocks>
 
## Environment
-**CWD**: `<absolute path>`
-**Repo**: `<owner>/<repo>` @ `<branch>` (last commit: `<sha7> <subject>`)
-**Uncommitted changes**: <none / brief summary>
-**Recent commits** (newest first):
  -`<sha7>` <subject>
-**Env / credentials**: <names only — e.g. `OPENROUTER_API_KEY` is in `<repo>/langgraph/.env`>
-**Running services / background processes**: <only if relevant to continuation>
 
## Relevant files
-`<absolute path>` — [modified] <what was changed>
-`<absolute path>` — [reference] <what's in it, why the new agent will need it>
 
## References
-`<doc / README / URL / related skill>` — <why it matters>

4. Write to file

Derive a slug from the task title (lowercase, hyphens, no special chars). Ensure the directory exists (mkdir -p /tmp/handoff), then write the document to /tmp/handoff/<YYYY-MM-DD>_<slug>.md. How, and what you print afterwards, depends on the host — check whether CODEX_THREAD_ID is set:

• Unset — Claude Code: write with the Write tool, then deliver the file

with SendUserFile.

• Set — Codex: write it with whatever file-write mechanism the host offers.

A read-only sandbox denies /tmp, so this write can fail; a denied write is not a failed run, because the printed document is the deliverable. On success, print the absolute path on its own line. On denial, print file not written: <reason> instead. Codex has no SendUserFile — never report a file as delivered.

5. Stop

The printed document plus step 4's one-line file result is the entire response. Do not add a preamble before the markdown (no "Here's the handoff doc"), a closing line after it (no "ready, copy it"), a summary, or any commentary.

The only exception is step 1: if the next step is unclear, ask the focused question first and wait. After the answer, generate the doc and stop.

Quality bar

The output must pass these checks. Revise before printing if any fails.

1. Self-contained. A new agent can take the first action without asking

the user a clarifying question to start.

1. Concrete next step. One specific action with an exact command or file

path. Not "review the plan", not "continue where we left off".

1. Absolute paths everywhere. Every file reference is fully qualified.

Every command is copy-pasteable as-is.

1. No conversation jargon. Don't write "as we discussed", "the issue from

earlier", "the change I just made". Restate the actual content.

1. No padded sections. A 3-line "Decisions" section of real content beats

a 10-line one of restated obvious things. Empty section → delete it.

1. Verifiable. Every non-trivial claim ("the bug is in TSV parsing")

should be backed by a file path or command listed in the doc.

1. No secret values. Env var names only. Never paste keys, tokens, or

passwords.

1. Document + file result is the entire response. No text before the

markdown block, no commentary after it. The only post-doc output is step 4's one-line file result.

Anti-patterns

• Vague goal: "Continue the eval work" → instead: "Run round 5 of the

LangGraph health-analysis eval, including the 31 OpenRouter models added on 2026-04-26."

• Naked path drops: "Look at run_batch.py" → instead: "langgraph/eval/scripts/run_batch.py —

change MODELS = [...] and THROTTLE_SECONDS (12 for :free models, 0.5 for paid)."

• Implicit "same as before": "Use the same approach as last time" →

instead: restate the approach in 1–2 lines.

• War story: long recap of what was tried during this session, with no

forward signal.

• Hidden assumptions: assuming the new agent shares your terminal env,

has the same skills installed, knows your file layout — state it.

• Pasting secret values in env / credentials section. Names only.

Example flow

User: /handoff

1. Check the conversation for an explicit next step. If clear, skip to step 3.
2. If unclear, ask one focused question — e.g. *"Will the next session

(a) only run the speed prescreen for the new models, or (b) the full round 5 including 100-case scoring? Different scope and env requirements."* Wait for the answer.

1. Run gathering commands in parallel:

`` pwd git -C <cwd> rev-parse --show-toplevel git -C <cwd> branch --show-current git -C <cwd> status -s git -C <cwd> log --oneline -10 ``

1. Walk back through the conversation, extracting modified files, decisions,

dead ends, env requirements.

1. Compose the markdown using the template, filling only the meaningful

sections.

1. Print it, write to /tmp/handoff/<YYYY-MM-DD>_<slug>.md, and report the

result the way step 4 requires for the current host. Nothing else — no preamble, no closing line, no commentary.