Skill v1.0.0
currentAutomated scan100/100version: "1.0.0" name: seo-checker description: Audit web pages for SEO issues in a real browser. Checks rendered meta tags, heading hierarchy, image alt text, structured data, canonical URLs, mobile rendering, and performance signals. Produces a scored report with specific findings and fixes. Read-only — inspects, doesn't modify. Requires the hanzi browser automation MCP server and Chrome extension. category: productivity
SEO Checker
You audit web pages for SEO issues using a real browser — rendered meta tags, actual heading structure, real schema markup, mobile viewport behavior. This skill is read-only: observe and report, don't modify.
Tool Selection Rule
- Prefer existing tools first (code search, local files,
curl). Review HTML source, meta tags, and sitemap before opening the browser. - Use Hanzi for Phase 2–5 — always open the browser for these phases even if Phase 1 found all static data. Do not substitute curl or WebFetch for browser phases.
Before Starting
Call browser_status to verify the extension is reachable. If unavailable, tell the user to install from: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/hanzi-browse/iklpkemlmbhemkiojndpbhoakgikpmcd
What You Need
- URL — page or site to audit
- Scope — single page, specific section, or full site (default: single page)
- Focus — any specific SEO concerns (e.g., "we're not showing up in rich results", "mobile traffic dropped")
Audit Phases
Phase 1 — Source Review (before browser)
Check what you can without a browser:
- Robots.txt: Fetch
<domain>/robots.txt— check for accidentalDisallow: /or blocked important paths. Note: some sites serve different robots.txt to different user agents (UA sniffing). If the curl result looks suspicious or overly restrictive, verify withbrowser_startto see what a real browser receives. - Sitemap: Fetch
<domain>/sitemap.xml— verify it exists and includes the target URL - HTML source: If accessible, review raw
<head>for meta tags, canonical, hreflang - Codebase (if source available): Scan for hardcoded noindex, missing meta tag templates, SEO component patterns
Summarize findings before opening the browser.
Phase 2 — Meta & Head Tags (browser)
Use browser_start to open the page and inspect the rendered DOM. JavaScript-rendered SPAs may have different meta tags than the raw HTML source.
- Title tag: Exists, 50-60 characters, unique, descriptive (not "Home" or "Untitled")
- Meta description: Exists, 150-160 characters, includes target keywords, compelling for CTR
- Canonical URL: Present, points to the correct URL (not a duplicate or wrong domain)
- Robots meta: Check for unintentional
noindex,nofollow, ornonedirectives - Open Graph tags:
og:title,og:description,og:image,og:url— all present and correct - Twitter Card tags:
twitter:card,twitter:title,twitter:description,twitter:image - Viewport meta:
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">present - Charset & lang:
<meta charset="utf-8">and<html lang="...">set correctly
Screenshot the page after loading.
Phase 3 — Content Structure (browser)
- H1 tag: Exactly one per page, descriptive, contains primary keyword
- Heading hierarchy: H1 → H2 → H3 — no skipped levels (e.g., H1 → H3 with no H2)
- Image alt text: All meaningful images have descriptive alt text; decorative images use
alt="" - Internal links: Key pages are linked, anchor text is descriptive (not "click here")
- Broken links: Check for obvious 404s or dead links on the page
Phase 4 — Structured Data (browser)
- JSON-LD / Microdata: Check
<script type="application/ld+json">blocks in the rendered DOM - Schema types: Verify appropriate types are used (Article, Product, LocalBusiness, BreadcrumbList, FAQ, etc.)
- Required properties: Each schema type has required fields — check they're populated (e.g., Article needs
headline,datePublished,author) - Validation: Flag malformed JSON-LD or schemas with empty/placeholder values
Phase 5 — Mobile & Performance (browser)
Render the page at a mobile viewport (375×812, iPhone-sized):
- Mobile layout: No horizontal scrolling, text readable without zooming, tap targets at least 48×48px
- Content parity: Mobile version has the same key content as desktop (Google uses mobile-first indexing)
- Image optimization: Check for oversized images (e.g., 2000px wide image in a 375px container), missing
loading="lazy"on below-fold images - CLS indicators: Elements that visibly shift during load (ads, images without dimensions, dynamically injected content)
- Core Web Vitals: Use
javascript_toolto extract real navigation timing from the Performance API:
const nav = performance.getEntriesByType('navigation')[0];const paint = performance.getEntriesByType('paint');({ttfb: nav.responseStart - nav.requestStart,domContentLoaded: nav.domContentLoadedEventEnd - nav.startTime,load: nav.loadEventEnd - nav.startTime,fcp: paint.find(e => e.name === 'first-contentful-paint')?.startTime,});
Screenshot at mobile viewport.
Scoring
Rate each category on a 0-10 scale:
| Category | What's checked | |
|---|---|---|
| Meta Tags | Title, description, canonical, robots, OG, Twitter cards | |
| Content Structure | H1, heading hierarchy, image alt text, internal links | |
| Structured Data | JSON-LD presence, correct types, required properties | |
| Mobile | Responsive layout, content parity, tap targets | |
| Performance Signals | Image sizes, lazy loading, CLS indicators | |
| Internationalisation | hreflang alternates, lang attribute, multilingual implementation |
Overall score = average of the 6 category scores (out of 10).
- 9-10: Excellent — production-ready SEO
- 7-8: Good — minor improvements needed
- 5-6: Needs work — several issues affecting visibility
- 3-4: Poor — significant SEO problems
- 0-2: Critical — major issues blocking indexing or ranking
Report Format
# SEO Audit: [URL]Overall Score: [X]/10## Meta Tags — [X]/10✓ [What passed — one line each]✗ [What failed — element, issue, specific fix]📸 Screenshot: [evidence]## Content Structure — [X]/10✓ / ✗ [same format]## Structured Data — [X]/10✓ / ✗ [same format]## Mobile — [X]/10✓ / ✗ [same format]## Performance Signals — [X]/10✓ / ✗ [same format]## Internationalisation — [X]/10✓ / ✗ [same format]## Top 3 Priorities1. [Most impactful fix — what to do and why]2. [Second priority]3. [Third priority]
For each failing item, include:
- What's wrong: specific element and current value
- Why it matters: impact on search visibility or user experience
- How to fix: concrete action (e.g., "Add
<meta name="description" content="...">with 150-160 chars describing the page") - Reference: link to relevant Google/web.dev guideline where helpful
Rules
- One page at a time — screenshot at each phase
- Be specific: "the hero image (1920×1080, 2.4MB)" not "some images are large"
- Cite standards: Google's SEO guidelines, web.dev, Schema.org specs
- Don't report unverified issues — if the rendered DOM differs from source, note both
- If
browser_starttimes out, callbrowser_screenshotto diagnose - Read-only — never modify the page, submit forms, or click CTAs
- SPA handling: always check rendered DOM, not just HTML source — SPAs may inject meta tags via JavaScript