Skill v1.0.0
currentAutomated scan100/100version: "1.0.0" name: pricing-playbook description: The 5 laws of Hormozi's LEAKED Pricing Playbook. Use it to analyze the current price, recommend a range, structure tiers and anchoring, and validate against the Value Equation and the market.
Pricing Playbook — 5 Laws
Source: LEAKED Pricing Playbook + cross-referenced with $100M Offers.
Law 1: Don't compete on price. Compete on value.
Before touching price, run the Value Equation (skill value-equation). If Probability sits at 4/10, dropping the price won't help — strengthen probability first (case studies, guarantees, a named mechanism).
Violation signal: "They charge X, I'll charge X-20%."
Law 2: Charge what it's worth, not what it costs.
Cost is your problem, not the customer's. Cost-plus pricing (cost + margin) leaves money on the table.
Value-based pricing:
- Measure the transformation delivered in dollars or time
- Charge 10-20% of the transformation
- Justify the price by the outcome, not the input
Example: if you help a client close an extra $100k in 60 days, charging $10-20k is defensible.
Law 3: Price signals quality.
A price that's too low = perception of low value.
Counterintuitively, high prices INCREASE:
- Customer commitment (skin in the game)
- Results (the customer actually applies it)
- Margin for a high-quality delivery
- Filtering out difficult customers
Rule of thumb: if more than 50% of leads say "done" without hesitating, your price is too low.
Law 4: Tiering captures more of the market without commoditizing.
3 standard tiers (silver / gold / platinum):
- Silver: core without premium support, entry price
- Gold (default): core + support + 1-2 bonuses (60-70% of customers pick it)
- Platinum: core + done-for-you + 1:1 mentorship + premium bonuses (10-15% pick it, but high margin)
Rules:
- The gap between tiers has to be perceived (not cosmetic)
- Platinum exists to make Gold look cheap (anchoring)
- Silver exists so you don't lose budget-conscious buyers
- Default = Gold (visual highlight on the LP)
Tiering by product category
These are market reference points (B2B/B2C, 2024-2026) — localize per market and currency. A wider range is fine; what matters is the ratio between tiers (Gold ~3-4x Silver; Platinum ~3-5x Gold).
| Category | Silver | Gold (default) | Platinum (decoy) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-paced digital course | $97 | $297 | $997 | |
| Live course (cohort) | $297 | $1,497 | $4,997 | |
| Mastermind / group coaching | $1,497 | $5,997 | $19,997 | |
| 1:1 consulting (3 months) | $4,997 | $11,997 | $29,997 | |
| B2B SaaS (monthly) | $149/mo | $499/mo | $1,497/mo | |
| B2B SaaS (annual, discounted) | $1,428/yr | $4,788/yr | $14,388/yr | |
| High-ticket service (3 months) | $5,997 | $17,997 | $59,997 + continuity | |
| Enterprise service (annual) | — | $60k | $150k+ |
Platinum's decoy function:
Platinum doesn't need to sell volume — it exists so Gold looks like "the obvious choice." 10-15% pick Platinum (high margin); 60-70% pick Gold, anchored against Platinum. If Gold alone were $11,997 with no $29k anchor, conversion would drop 25-40%.
Signs of broken tiering:
- Tiers too similar (Silver $297, Gold $397, Platinum $497) → false choice, nothing anchors
- No Platinum → Gold looks like the ceiling, the customer haggles
- No Silver → you lose budget-conscious buyers and gain nothing
- The difference is only "more hours/sessions" → commoditization, the customer compares hour to hour
Law 5: Longer runway, bigger ask.
If you serve the customer for 12 months, you can charge far more than for a 1-month engagement — because the anchor is bigger and the cumulative transformation is bigger.
Application:
- Long programs charge more per month (not less) than short ones
- The annual-package anchor > the monthly-package anchor × 12
- Genuine delayed gratification = a bigger ask
Pricing review workflow
- Gather: offer + current price + 3-5 competitors + target margin + LTV
- Run the Value Equation first (skill
value-equation) - Score each of the 5 laws with a grade and rationale
- Identify whether the problem is price or perception (critical distinction)
- Recommend a range (not a single price), with explicit anchoring
- Suggest a structure: tiers, installments, downsell, upsell
- Suggest a validation test (next 10-20 leads) executable in 1-2 weeks
Signs of broken pricing
- Charging the same as a direct competitor (you're a commodity)
- No tiers, no anchoring (leaving revenue on the table)
- Price justified by hours/modules instead of transformation
- More than 50% say "ok, done" without hesitating (underpriced)
- More than 90% say "too expensive" and vanish (overpriced OR weak value equation)
Use by case
| Case | Application | |
|---|---|---|
| Sales LP | LP shows 3 tiers; Gold default highlighted; price anchored against ROI | |
| Ad script | Pull price out of the initial ad (reveal it on the LP); use ROI in the copy | |
| Business plan | Pricing strategy per segment; projected tier mix; 70%+ margin guardrail |
Detailed reference
See reference/leaked-pricing-playbook.md.