hermesonehq/hermes-registry/agent-platform-eval-flywheel

Claude Code and agent skill by hermesonehq/hermes-registry

Trust tier 2
  • community
LLM review pending
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Measures and improves the quality of AI models and agents on Google Cloud using the Eval Quality Flywheel methodology. Use when evaluating an agent or model, building an eval dataset, picking or writing evaluation metrics, analyzing failures, comparing results before and after a fix, or when guidance is needed on Agent Platform eval methodology — including dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. For fine-tuning, use agent-platform-tuning. For general production deployment, use agent-platform-deploy.

Install

npx vskill@latest install hermesonehq/hermes-registry/agent-platform-eval-flywheel

SKILL.md

Agent Platform Eval Flywheel Skill

Help users evaluate and iteratively improve GenAI models and agents using the Agent Platform GenAI Evaluation SDK (google.genai / agentplatform).

When to use this skill

  • Evaluating GenAI agents or models with the Agent Platform GenAI

Evaluation SDK (client.evals.evaluate()).

  • Creating evaluation datasets from session traces, pandas DataFrames, or

synthetic generation.

  • Selecting, configuring, or writing custom evaluation metrics.
  • Analyzing rubric verdicts, loss patterns, and clustering failures.
  • Suggesting concrete code/prompt improvements based on eval results.
  • Evaluating a model served on an Agent Platform endpoint (BYOM) or a

Model-as-a-Service (MaaS) model by ID — including deploying the model first if needed. For this case, follow references/deployment.md and use the endpoint_evaluation.py / maas_evaluation.py scripts.

Safety & Confirmation Tiers (CRITICAL)

Before executing any commands or scripts on behalf of the user, you MUST adhere to the following safety tiers based on the action requested:

  1. Tier R: Read-only (inspect_results.py, compare_results.py, validate_dataset.py, parse_adk_traces.py, render_html_report.py)
  • Rule: No confirmation needed. You may execute these helper scripts immediately to inspect data, validate schemas, parse traces, or compare evaluation results.
  1. Tier M: Read-only with Compute Costs (`client.evals.run_inference`, `client.evals.evaluate`, `client.evals.generate_user_scenarios`, `client.evals.generate_loss_clusters`)
  • Rule: These operations invoke LLMs or remote evaluation services

that consume compute resources and incur costs. This requires interactive confirmation with 'Yes'/'No' options. Once granted once, you do not have to prompt for future evaluation.

Setup

Install the SDK:

bash
pip install google-cloud-aiplatform[evaluation]>=1.154.0 google-genai>=1.0.0

Need GOOGLE_CLOUD_PROJECT and GOOGLE_CLOUD_LOCATION. Check env vars first; if missing, ask the user. Newer Gemini models often need location="global".

The Quality Flywheel

Five stages, run in order on the first pass, then loop 2 → 5 until quality targets are met.

Shortcuts that waste time
ShortcutWhy it fails
"I'll tune the metric threshold down so it passes."Hides real failures. Fix the agent, not the bar.
"This case is flaky, I'll skip it."Flakiness reveals non-determinism in the agent. Fix with temperature=0 or stricter instructions.
"I just need to fix the eval dataset, not the agent."If expected outputs keep moving, the agent has a behavior problem.
"I can tell from the trace it works — skip Stage 3."Self-grading doesn't generalize. Always run evaluate() and read scores.
"One iteration is enough."Expect 5–10+ iterations. Stopping early leaves regressions on other metrics undetected.
1. Prepare Data

Produce an EvaluationDataset. There are three input shapes, pick the one that matches the data the user already has:

  • `EvalCase` list (single-turn or multi-turn):

``python from agentplatform import types dataset = types.EvaluationDataset(eval_cases=[ types.EvalCase(prompt="What is 2+2?", response="4", reference="4"), # For multi-turn agent traces, set agent_data instead of prompt/response. ]) ``

Multi-turn agent traces wrap each conversation in AgentData → ConversationTurn → AgentEvent. See references/dataset_schema.md for the full type hierarchy.

  • Pandas DataFrame (tabular sources — CSV, BigQuery, Sheets):

```python import pandas as pd from agentplatform import types

df = pd.DataFrame({ "prompt": ["What is 2+2?", "Capital of France?"], "response": ["4", "Paris"], "reference": ["4", "Paris"], }) dataset = types.EvaluationDataset(eval_dataset_df=df) ```

Column names must match the fields the chosen metrics expect (see references/dataset_schema.md for the per-metric requirements table).

  • Cold start (no data at all): synthesize scenarios server-side with

client.evals.generate_user_scenarios(...) and a UserScenarioGenerationConfig (user_scenario_count, simulation_instruction, environment_data). Stage 2 plays them out.

For ADK session dumps, use scripts/parse_adk_traces.py instead of writing the conversion by hand.

2. Run Inference

Populate responses/traces on the dataset. Skip this stage if traces are already complete (e.g., production logs or replay).

python
# Agent eval — pass a callable wrapping the user's ADK Agent/App.
client.evals.run_inference(model=agent_callable, src=dataset)
# Model eval — pass a model ID directly.
client.evals.run_inference(model="gemini-2.5-flash", src=dataset)
# Synthesized scenarios — let the simulator drive.
client.evals.run_inference(
model=agent_callable,
src=dataset,
user_simulator_config=UserSimulatorConfig(max_turn=10),
)
# DataFrame also works as src= — no EvalCase wrapping needed.
client.evals.run_inference(model="gemini-2.5-flash", src=df)
3. Grade (always run)
python
result = client.evals.evaluate(dataset=dataset, metrics=[...])

Pick metrics by what you want to measure. Full catalog in references/metric_registry.md.

Agent metrics (multi-turn, adaptive rubrics) — start here for agent eval.

GoalMetric
Did the agent achieve the user's goal?multi_turn_task_success
Was the reasoning path logical and efficient?multi_turn_trajectory_quality
Tool/function calling quality across turnsmulti_turn_tool_use_quality
Overall conversational qualitymulti_turn_general_quality
Final response quality (no reference needed)final_response_quality
Final response vs. a golden referencefinal_response_match
Single-turn tool usetool_use_quality

General quality metrics (single-turn, adaptive rubrics) — for model eval.

GoalMetric
Overall response quality (recommended starting point)general_quality
Linguistic quality (fluency, coherence, grammar)text_quality
Adherence to specific constraints / instructionsinstruction_following

Static rubric metrics (fixed criteria) — apply alongside the above.

GoalMetric
Catch hallucinated claims (RAG, factual answers)hallucination
Factuality / consistency against provided contextgrounding
Safety policy compliancesafety

Domain-specific check no built-in covers: write a custom metric.

  • Predefined: types.RubricMetric.<NAME> — server-side AutoRater, no

judge model needed.

  • Custom LLM-as-a-judge: types.LLMMetric with prompt_template or

types.MetricPromptBuilder for structured rubrics.

  • Custom code: types.CodeExecutionMetric with a custom_function

string containing def evaluate(instance: dict) for remote sandboxed execution; or types.Metric with custom_function=<callable> for local execution.

Always persist the result so Stage 4 and 5 can read it. Save both JSON (machine-readable, diffable) and HTML (human-readable, linkable):

python
import datetime
from pathlib import Path
from agentplatform._genai import _evals_visualization
out_dir = Path("artifacts/grade_results")
out_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
ts = datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d_%H%M%S")
result_json = result.model_dump_json()
(out_dir / f"results_{ts}.json").write_text(result_json)
html = _evals_visualization.get_evaluation_html(result_json)
(out_dir / f"results_{ts}.html").write_text(str(html))

Or after the fact: scripts/render_html_report.py --type evaluation or scripts/inspect_results.py --save-html.

4. Analyze Failures

Read summary_metrics and eval_case_results — never fabricate scores. Use scripts/inspect_results.py --failing-only to filter to failures.

For each failed metric, see references/failure_patterns.md for deeper diagnoses. The compact mapping:

Failing metricWhat to change
multi_turn_task_success lowThe agent isn't completing the goal — fix orchestration, missing tool calls, premature termination, wrong tool selection.
multi_turn_trajectory_quality lowThe agent reaches the goal inefficiently — refine planning prompts, remove redundant tool calls.
multi_turn_tool_use_quality lowFix tool descriptions, parameter docstrings, or agent instructions for tool selection.
final_response_quality lowRead auto-generated rubric verdicts; refine instructions to address the worst-scoring criterion.
final_response_match lowThe agent's final answer doesn't match the golden reference — adjust response format or update the reference.
hallucination lowTighten instructions to stay grounded in tool output; verify the tool actually returned the claimed data.
grounding lowThe response contradicts the provided context — add explicit "cite only from context" instructions.
safety lowAdd safety guardrails; review the violating content category in the rubric verdict.
general_quality / text_quality lowAdjust system instruction wording; the model's default phrasing is too generic for the task.
instruction_following lowThe agent is ignoring constraints — restate them in the system instruction or use stricter wording.
Agent calls wrong toolsFix tool descriptions, agent instructions, or tool_config.
Agent calls extra toolsAdd explicit stop instructions, or switch to multi_turn_tool_use_quality to surface the extra calls in the rubric.

For 10+ failures on the same metric, use the Error Analysis service to cluster failures into themes (L1/L2 taxonomy categories) instead of reading every trace:

This is the start of the file. Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
91
Repository forks
17
7-day trend score
23

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/hermesonehq/hermes-registry/agent-platform-eval-flywheel/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/hermesonehq/hermes-registry/agent-platform-eval-flywheel)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.