<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentAutomated scan100/100
hurricane0698/zot/zot-vault-review
──Details
PublishedNovember 5, 2026 at 05:41 AM
Content Hashsha256:9c07a6683a212b4c...
Git SHA3560a7519e2b
──Files
Files (1 file, 2.0 KB)
SKILL.md2.0 KBactive
SKILL.md · 37 lines · 2.0 KB

name: zot-vault-review description: Periodic review skill for zot vaults. Use when the user asks for weekly review, vault maintenance, linting, retrospective, meta-learning analysis, or to turn accumulated notes into clearer understanding and output drills. Include QMD refresh and search checks, and use the smoke test when local workflow wiring needs verification. Not for first-time ingest of new sources or large cross-operation wiki rewrites. metadata: version: "1.0.0"


zot Vault Review

This skill is for periodic maintenance and synthesis of a zot vault.

Use zot-vault-wiki instead when the review turns into a broader compile pass, a feedback-resolution sprint, or a multi-step reorganization across many notes.

Required workflow

  1. Resolve the vault path from ZOT_VAULT, then legacy OMEGA_VAULT.
  2. Read kb/meta/index.md, kb/meta/log.md, and kb/meta/review.md when present.
  3. Run qmd update -c <vault-local-collection> if note files changed since the last review.
  4. Run "$ZOT_VAULT/scripts/kb-lint" for a mechanical pass.
  5. Identify orphan notes, stale syntheses, duplicated concepts, and missing active-output drills.
  6. If the review produced durable insight, file it under kb/wiki/syntheses/ or kb/wiki/queries/.
  7. Use "$ZOT_VAULT/scripts/kb-smoke-test" when search or CLI wiring looks suspicious.
  8. When the user asks for versioning, review the diff before any commit.
  9. If the work stops being a review and becomes a structural rewrite, switch to zot-vault-wiki.

Review outputs to prefer

  • weekly synthesis note
  • error-pattern note
  • "teach it back" drill
  • migration suggestions from legacy notes into kb/wiki/**
  • retrieval sanity check based on CLI + qmd smoke test

Guardrails

  • Do not auto-commit without checking what changed.
  • Keep reviews focused on compounding understanding, not vanity metrics.
  • If a file may contain secrets, flag it and recommend rotation or removal.
  • Prefer review outputs such as backlog trimming, synthesis notes, and drills over broad note surgery.
All versions