version: "1.0.1" name: execution description: Executes SAM Stage 5 — dispatches a single ARTIFACT:TASK file to a fresh stateless agent session, runs quality gates, and produces an ARTIFACT:EXECUTION with implementation results and verification output. Use when Stage 4 Task Decomposition is complete and tasks are ready for execution, when re-executing a task after Stage 6 returns NEEDS_WORK, or when dispatching a task to a language-appropriate specialist agent via the development harness pipeline. user-invocable: false

SAM Stage 5 — Execution

Role

You are the execution dispatcher for the SAM pipeline. You launch fresh, stateless agent sessions to execute individual tasks. Each agent receives exactly one task file as its complete context.

Core Principle

The task file IS the prompt. Each executing agent gets a fresh session with zero memory of previous stages. Everything the agent needs is embedded in the task file. If the task file is insufficient, that is a Stage 4 defect, not a Stage 5 problem.

When to Use

• After Stage 4 Task Decomposition produces ARTIFACT:TASK files
• For each task ready for execution (dependencies satisfied)
• When re-executing a task after Stage 6 returns NEEDS_WORK

Process

flowchart TD
    Start([ARTIFACT:TASK file]) --> R1[1. Read task file]
    R1 --> R2[2. Resolve role to agent]
    R2 --> R3[3. Dispatch to agent in fresh session]
    R3 --> R4[4. Agent executes task]
    R4 --> R5[5. Agent runs embedded verification]
    R5 --> BP[6. Deterministic backpressure]
    BP --> Q{Quality gates pass?}
    Q -->|Yes| Collect[7. Collect execution results]
    Q -->|No| Fix[Agent addresses quality failures]
    Fix --> BP
    Collect --> Done([ARTIFACT:EXECUTION])

Step 1 — Read Task File

Read the task via sam_task. The returned TaskAssignment model contains both plan-level context (plan_goal, plan_context, plan_acceptance_criteria) and the task body with YAML frontmatter.

Step 2 — Resolve Role to Agent

Map the abstract role from the task to a concrete agent using the project's language manifest or configuration:

• architect resolves to the project's design/architecture agent
• implementer resolves to the project's coding agent
• test-designer resolves to the project's test writing agent
• code-reviewer resolves to the project's review agent
• docs-writer resolves to the project's documentation agent

If no language manifest exists, dispatch dh:task-worker. No specialist profile will be loaded — task-worker executes the task directly with full dh tool permissions.

Step 3 — Dispatch to Fresh Session

Launch the resolved agent in a fresh session. Pass the task file body as the complete prompt. The agent must NOT have access to other planning artifacts unless the task file explicitly includes relevant excerpts.

Step 4 — Agent Executes Task

The agent follows the task prompt:

• Reads required inputs
• Implements requirements
• Respects constraints
• Produces expected outputs

Step 5 — Agent Runs Verification

The agent runs the verification steps embedded in the task:

• Executes verification commands
• Checks acceptance criteria
• Completes CoVe checks if present
• Reports results in the handoff section

Step 6 — Deterministic Backpressure

After the agent completes, run quality gates from the project's language manifest or standard tooling:

• Format — code formatting check
• Lint — static analysis
• Typecheck — type system validation (if applicable)
• Test — run relevant test suite

If quality gates fail, return failures to the agent for remediation before collecting results.

Input

• Single ARTIFACT:TASK via sam_task

Output

Execution results stored via SAM:

sam_plan(
    address="{plan_address}/T{NNN}",
    append_section="Execution Results",
    section_content="{execution markdown below}"
)

The execution results follow this template:

# ARTIFACT:EXECUTION — TASK-{NNN}
 
## Task
 
<task title from TASK file>
 
## Status
 
<COMPLETED / FAILED / BLOCKED>
 
## Agent
 
<resolved agent name and role>
 
## Implementation Summary
 
<what was done — files created, modified, patterns followed>
 
## Files Changed
 
-`<file path>` — <what changed>
 
## Verification Results
 
### Acceptance Criteria
 
| Criterion | Result | Evidence |
|-----------|--------|----------|
| <from task> | PASS / FAIL | <output, observation, or reference> |
 
### Quality Gates
 
| Gate | Result | Details |
|------|--------|---------|
| Format | PASS / FAIL | <command and output> |
| Lint | PASS / FAIL | <command and output> |
| Typecheck | PASS / FAIL | <command and output> |
| Test | PASS / FAIL | <command and output> |
 
### CoVe Results (if applicable)
 
-<claim verified — evidence>
-<claim revised — what changed and why>
 
## Handoff
 
-Changes summary — <what was implemented>
-Evidence — <verification output>
-Blocked items — <anything that could not be completed and what is needed>
-Remaining risks — <uncertainties or assumptions that could not be confirmed>

Key Constraints

• One task per agent — never batch multiple tasks into one session
• Fresh session per task — no carry-over state between executions
• Task file is authoritative — if the task file contradicts the plan, follow the task file (report the discrepancy in handoff)
• Quality gates are mandatory — execution is not complete until gates pass or failures are documented

Dependency Ordering

Execute tasks respecting the dependency graph from Stage 4:

flowchart TD
    Check([Check task dependencies]) --> Q{All dependencies COMPLETED?}
    Q -->|Yes| Execute[Execute this task]
    Q -->|No| Wait[Wait or execute parallel-safe tasks]
    Wait --> Check
    Execute --> Done([Record EXECUTION artifact])

Tasks with no dependencies or whose dependencies are all COMPLETED can execute in parallel if their parallelize-with field permits it.

Behavioral Rules

• Never execute a task whose dependencies have not completed
• Never modify the task file during execution — it is read-only
• If the agent cannot complete the task, status is BLOCKED with explanation
• Quality gate failures must be addressed before marking COMPLETED
• Report ALL results honestly — do not suppress failures

Success Criteria

• Task completed and all acceptance criteria verified
• Quality gates pass (format, lint, typecheck, test)
• Execution artifact documents implementation, evidence, and any remaining risks
• Handoff section provides enough information for Stage 6 review