joenandez/spectre/spectre-plan-route
Claude Code and agent skill by joenandez/spectre
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Internal semantic classifier for Plan-or-Execute preparation. Use only from Plan or Execute with bounded routing input; never for planning, artifacts, telemetry, or user gates.
Install
npx vskill@latest install joenandez/spectre/spectre-plan-routeSKILL.md
plan-route
Purpose
Classify into plan-routing/v1 for Plan/Execute; caller owns authority.
Inputs
- Canonical Scope/authority + bounded work, not size.
- Initial; observed uses prior decision + selection before drafting; legacy may include Routing Observations.
- Execute when transported assessment is missing/materially stale.
- Resume-only legacy size is normalized once.
Working Set
- Bounded scan: topology, uncertainty, evidence, boundaries, graph risk, shipped precedent, user decisions.
- If missing evidence alone would cross a costlier route, use exactly one bounded probe (
@spectre:finder/@spectre:patterns) for one repository question.
Outputs + DONE
Produce plan-routing/v1: shape ATOMIC|DIRECT|STRUCTURED; uncertainty LOW|MODERATE|HIGH; evidence SUFFICIENT|PROBE_REQUIRED|PROBED; protected_boundaries[] {type, threatened_invariant, failure_mode}; task_graph_risk LOW|HIGH; design flag, size, route, rationale. Observed adds regret, reason codes, KEEP|RERUN_SMALLER|RERUN_LARGER.
DONE when fields validate; probe is consumed; STRUCTURED names workstreams; HIGH graph risk names an implementation-graph failure; only table derives size/route.
Method / guardrails
| Semantic result | Size · route | |
|---|---|---|
| ATOMIC + LOW + no changed protected boundary | XS · XS_DIRECT | |
| ATOMIC + LOW + changed protected boundary OR DIRECT + LOW | S · S_DIRECT | |
| ATOMIC/DIRECT + MODERATE/HIGH | M · M_REVIEWED_DIRECT | |
| STRUCTURED + LOW/MODERATE + ordinary graph risk | L · L_STRUCTURED | |
| STRUCTURED + HIGH uncertainty or HIGH task-graph risk | XL · XL_REVIEWED_STRUCTURED |
- STRUCTURED requires multiple independently implementable workstreams; render variants of one surface (layout, density, breakpoint, theme), dependencies, supporting artifacts, workflow/acceptance steps, and pilots are not workstreams.
- Two shipped instances of a change-shape make the next DIRECT; its layers are not workstreams; STRUCTURED requires a named delta beyond repetition.
- HIGH graph risk requires a credible implementation ordering/coordination/rollback failure; workflow gates/state transitions do not qualify.
- A protected boundary needs a concrete invariant + credible failure mode; it floors size at S but never creates structure or HIGH graph risk.
- Honor confirmed Scope assumptions and explicit selected-source boundaries. Missing paths/evidence permit at most the one probe; when Scope mandates an abstraction, spend it on whether it ships; classify the real delta. Only unresolved, approach-changing uncertainty affects size.
- Design authority needs unresolved product, compatibility, destructive, migration/rollback, or architecture choice; size and routine placement never create it.
- Observed consumes the completed minimum-solution selection before drafting, reports regret and KEEP|RERUN_SMALLER|RERUN_LARGER, and never repeats work or removes artifacts. The same routing table alone maps selected structural facts, uncertainty, protected boundaries, graph risk, and assurance floor; it does not select solution shape.
- Normalize legacy once: MICRO→XS, LIGHT→S, STANDARD-DIRECT→M, STANDARD→L, COMPREHENSIVE→XL; labels never decide.
- Never use file volume, dependency count, surface counts, or sensitive-domain keywords as size authority, and never let them create workstreams. Never plan, write artifacts, emit telemetry, or present gates while classifying; these limits end with the record and never bind the caller's next step.
Handoff
Inline (Plan): keep record/probe as internal data; never print it as a reply. DONE does not end caller's turn: in the same response, run the caller's next step. Child (Execute): final message is the record. Caller owns persistence, explanation, orchestration, gates, telemetry.
Escalate-If
- Canonical Scope absent/conflicting, invalid enum, or boundary lacks predicate.
- Material user-authority decision: report
design_authority_required, never decide.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingplugins/spectre/skills/spectre-plan-route/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 164
- Repository forks
- 16
- 7-day trend score
- 31
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/joenandez/spectre/spectre-plan-route)