version: "1.0.2" name: what-am-i-missing description: Surface risks, blind spots, overlooked items, and accountability across commitments and relationships. Triggers on "what am I overlooking?", "blind spots", "what's falling through the cracks", "what do I owe?", "am I overdue?", "check my commitments". See also: risk-surfacer for the proactive auto-firing version on overdue items and cooling relationships. argument-hint: "[person name or 'overdue']" effort-level: high

What Am I Missing

Surface risks, blind spots, overlooked items, and accountability across all areas.

What to Check

1. Commitment Risks

From context/commitments.md:

• Overdue items
• Items at risk (due soon, no progress)
• Patterns of slippage
• Cascading delays

2. Relationship Risks

From people/ files:

• Cooling relationships (60+ days)
• Unfulfilled promises to key people
• Sentiment shifts detected
• Key relationships not nurtured

3. Waiting Risks

From context/waiting.md:

• Overdue items from others
• Critical dependencies at risk
• Patterns (chronic late deliverers)

4. Pattern Risks

From context/patterns.md:

• Recurring issues not addressed
• Blind spots observed
• Capacity concerns
• Self-limiting patterns

5. Strategic Risks

Looking at the bigger picture:

• Important-but-not-urgent items being neglected
• Opportunities cooling
• Decisions being avoided

6. Data Consistency Check

Cross-reference memory DB against file state to catch divergence:

• Run claudia memory recall "project status commitments" --project-dir "$PWD" --limit 10
• Compare recalled statuses (interview completion, deliverable state) against file-based trackers
• For any active project with a dashboard/README tracker, grep actual file statuses and compare to stated counts
• Flag contradictions: "Memory says X is completed, but tracker shows it outstanding" (or vice versa)
• Recommend correction path: update the stale source to match the authoritative one

This step catches the scenario where an interview/task was processed but only some status sources were updated.

Output Format

## What You Might Be Missing - [Date]
 
### Commitment Risks
 
**Overdue:**
- [Item] was due [date] - [impact]
 
**At Risk:**
- [Item] due [date] - [concern]
 
### Relationship Risks
 
**Cooling:**
- [Person] - last contact [X] days ago
  -> Was: [relationship context]
  -> Risk: [what could happen]
 
**Open Loops:**
- Promised [thing] to [person] - [status]
 
### Waiting Risks
 
**Overdue from Others:**
- [Item] from [person] - expected [date]
  -> Impact: [why this matters]
  -> Suggested action: [what to do]
 
### Pattern Risks
 
- [Pattern] - seen [X] times recently
  -> Concern: [why it matters]
  -> Suggestion: [what to consider]
 
### Strategic Blind Spots
 
- [Thing being neglected]
  -> Why it matters: [impact]
  -> Suggestion: [action]
 
### By Relationship
 
#### [Person/Client Name]
**I Owe:**
- [Item] - due [Date]
 
**They Owe:**
- [Item] - since [Date]
 
[Repeat for key relationships with open items]
 
**Recovery Actions:**
- [Overdue item]: [What to do now]
 
### Data Consistency
 
- [Source A] says [X], but [Source B] says [Y]
  -> Authoritative source: [which one and why]
  -> Fix: Update [stale source] to match
 
### Summary
 
Critical: [X items need immediate attention]
Watch: [Y items to keep an eye on]
Consider: [Z strategic things to think about]
Consistency: [N data mismatches found across sources]

Tone

• Matter-of-fact, not alarmist
• Specific, not vague
• Actionable suggestions
• Prioritized by importance
• Respectful of user's judgment

When to Use

• When feeling overwhelmed and wanting perspective
• Before important planning sessions
• When something feels "off" but unclear what
• As a regular check-in (weekly or biweekly)

Usage Variations

Full analysis: Comprehensive review across all risk categories and relationships.

For specific person: /what-am-i-missing [person name] Filters to only show commitments and risks involving that person.

Quick overdue only: /what-am-i-missing overdue Shows only overdue items and immediate recovery actions.

Quick check: Major risks only, no deep analysis.