kenny589/gtm-flywheel/icp-matrix-builder
Claude Code and agent skill by kenny589/gtm-flywheel
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Build comprehensive Ideal Customer Profile matrices that define exactly who to target. Tiering frameworks, scoring models, and segmentation strategies for precision outbound.
Install
npx vskill@latest install kenny589/gtm-flywheel/icp-matrix-builderSKILL.md
ICP Matrix Builder
When to Use
- Launching outbound for a new company or product line
- Refining targeting after initial campaign data comes in
- Expanding into new verticals or market segments
- Building the foundation for any lead generation or ABM campaign
Framework
What an ICP Matrix Is (And Isn't)
An ICP Matrix is a structured scoring document that ranks and segments your ideal buyers across multiple dimensions. It's the bridge between "we sell to B2B companies" and "we target Series B SaaS companies with 100-500 employees who just hired their first VP of Sales."
It IS:
- A living document that evolves with campaign data
- A scoring framework that makes targeting decisions objective
- A segmentation tool that enables personalized outreach at scale
It is NOT:
- A one-time exercise you do during onboarding and forget
- A single persona description
- A firmographic filter (company size + industry alone is not an ICP)
The 5 Dimensions of an ICP Matrix
Every complete ICP Matrix scores prospects across five dimensions:
Dimension 1: Firmographic Fit
Does the company match your ideal customer profile structurally?
| Attribute | Tier 1 (Best) | Tier 2 (Good) | Tier 3 (Acceptable) | Disqualified | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company size | Define range | Define range | Define range | Too small/large | |
| Revenue | Define range | Define range | Define range | Outside range | |
| Industry | Primary verticals | Adjacent verticals | Emerging fit | No fit | |
| Geography | Primary markets | Secondary markets | Expansion markets | Restricted | |
| Business model | Exact match | Similar | Adaptable | Incompatible | |
| Growth stage | Ideal stage | Adjacent stages | Possible fit | Wrong stage |
How to fill this in:
- Start with your best 10 customers — what do they have in common?
- Look at your worst 10 customers — what disqualified them (in hindsight)?
- The patterns that appear in your best but NOT your worst = your Tier 1 criteria
Dimension 2: Technographic Fit
Does their tech stack indicate they're a good fit?
| Attribute | Signal Strength | Why It Matters | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uses your integration partners | Strong | Lower friction to adopt | |
| Uses a competitor | Strong | Active buyer, proven budget | |
| Tech stack complexity matches | Medium | Right sophistication level | |
| Recently adopted adjacent tools | Medium | Active buying cycle | |
| No relevant tech stack | Weak | May not understand the category |
Dimension 3: Buying Intent Signals
Is this company likely to be in-market right now?
| Signal | Intent Level | Scoring Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hiring for the role your product serves | Very High | 5x | |
| Recent funding round | High | 4x | |
| Competitor evaluation (G2, review sites) | Very High | 5x | |
| Content consumption (webinars, guides) | Medium-High | 3x | |
| Website visits (if tracking available) | High | 4x | |
| Leadership change in relevant dept | Medium | 2x | |
| No detectable intent | Low | 1x |
Dimension 4: Persona Mapping
Who within the company should you target?
For each ICP tier, define 2-3 target personas:
| Persona Attribute | What to Define | |
|---|---|---|
| Title patterns | VP Sales, Director of Revenue, Head of Growth (include variants) | |
| Department | Sales, Marketing, RevOps, Growth | |
| Seniority level | C-Suite, VP, Director, Manager | |
| Decision role | Economic buyer, Champion, Influencer, Blocker | |
| Pain points | 3-5 specific, measurable pains this persona faces | |
| Buying triggers | What events push them to evaluate solutions | |
| Success metrics | What KPIs they're measured on | |
| Common objections | Top 3-5 reasons they say no |
Dimension 5: Engagement Readiness
How likely is this company to respond to outbound?
| Factor | High Readiness | Low Readiness | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous interactions | Engaged before (event, content, trial) | Cold — no prior touchpoint | |
| Outbound receptiveness | SMB/mid-market, growth-stage | Enterprise, heavily gatekept | |
| Channel preference | Active on LinkedIn, responsive to email | Dark social, unreachable online | |
| Sales cycle length | < 60 days | 6+ months | |
| Committee size | 1-3 decision makers | 5+ stakeholders |
The Tiering Framework
After scoring all five dimensions, segment accounts into tiers:
| Tier | Criteria | Outreach Strategy | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1: Bullseye | 4-5 dimensions score "Strong" | Hyper-personalized, multi-channel, 8+ touches | 5-10% of list | |
| Tier 2: Strong Fit | 3-4 dimensions score "Strong" | Signal-based personalization, email-first | 20-30% of list | |
| Tier 3: Good Fit | 2-3 dimensions score "Strong" | Bucket personalization, email-only | 40-50% of list | |
| Tier 4: Stretch | 1-2 dimensions score "Strong" | Test with small batch, generic angle | 10-20% of list | |
| Disqualified | 0 dimensions score "Strong" OR has a DQ flag | Do not contact | Remove from list |
Disqualification triggers (immediate removal regardless of other scores):
- Company too small to have budget
- Industry you can't serve
- Already a customer
- Competitor or partner (unless intentional)
- Bad data (no valid email, wrong person)
Building the Matrix: 6-Step Process
Step 1: Analyze Your Best Customers
Pull your top 10-20 customers by: revenue, retention, NPS, speed-to-close, or expansion rate.
For each, document:
- Firmographics (size, revenue, industry, geo)
- What triggered them to buy
- Who the champion was (title, seniority)
- How long the sales cycle took
- What their tech stack looked like at purchase
Step 2: Analyze Your Worst Customers
Pull 10-20 churned or low-value customers. Document the same attributes.
The gap between best and worst = your ICP definition.
Step 3: Identify Scoring Patterns
Look for attributes that appear in 70%+ of your best customers but less than 30% of your worst:
Step 4: Build the Scoring Model
Assign point values to each attribute:
| Dimension | Attribute | Tier 1 Points | Tier 2 Points | Tier 3 Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firmographic | 50-200 employees | 10 | 5 | 2 | |
| Firmographic | B2B SaaS | 8 | 4 | 2 | |
| Technographic | Uses Salesforce | 6 | 3 | 1 | |
| Intent | Hiring SDRs | 10 | 5 | 2 | |
| Intent | Recent funding | 8 | 4 | 2 | |
| Persona | VP Sales title | 6 | 3 | 1 |
Total possible: Sum of all Tier 1 points Tier thresholds: Tier 1 = 80%+, Tier 2 = 60-79%, Tier 3 = 40-59%, Below 40% = DQ
Step 5: Validate with Campaign Data
After running your first campaigns, compare:
- Positive reply rate by ICP tier
- Meeting rate by ICP tier
- Close rate by ICP tier
If Tier 2 accounts are outperforming Tier 1, your scoring model needs adjustment. The data will tell you which attributes actually predict buying behavior vs. which ones you assumed would.
Step 6: Iterate Quarterly
Every quarter, re-run the analysis:
- Which attributes correlated with closed deals?
- Which new signals appeared in your best customers?
- Has your product evolved to serve a different segment better?
Update the matrix. Adjust scoring weights. Re-tier your target accounts.
Multiple ICP Segments
Most companies have 2-4 distinct ICP segments. Each needs its own matrix:
Rule: Each segment gets its own campaigns, its own copy, and its own personalization strategy. Never blend segments in a single campaign.
Templates
ICP Matrix Template
Tips
- Your ICP is not who you CAN sell to — it's who you SHOULD sell to. The narrower your ICP, the higher your conversion rates.
- Start with 1 segment, not 4. Validate one ICP completely before expanding to adjacent segments.
- The #1 mistake in ICP development: using only firmographic data. A 100-person SaaS company that just raised Series B and is hiring 5 SDRs is a completely different prospect than a 100-person SaaS company that's been flat for 3 years. Same firmographics, wildly different intent.
- Interview your sales team. They know which deals close fast and which are painful — that pattern recognition is your ICP definition.
- If you don't have 10 customers to analyze yet, start with competitor customer analysis. Who are THEIR best customers? That's your starting ICP.
- Update your matrix every time you close (or lose) a significant deal. What did you learn? Did it match your scoring model?
Progressive disclosure: load industry-specific ICP templates and scoring benchmarks only when building a matrix for a specific vertical.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingicp-research/icp-matrix-builder/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 71
- Repository forks
- 26
- 7-day trend score
- 0
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/kenny589/gtm-flywheel/icp-matrix-builder)