krzysztofdudek/urdskill/urd
Claude Code and agent skill by krzysztofdudek/urdskill
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Use before you act on anything you are not sure you understood: a user message, a spec, a plan, a ticket, or a case you hit mid-task. Your default is to act; this fires when acting means picking one reading over another. Signals: the message could be a question or an instruction ("maybe…", "what if…", "I''m asking"); a short reply ("ok", "a", "sure") answers something you proposed; "this", "it" or "that" has no clear referent; a new instruction contradicts an earlier one; scope words leave the…
Install
npx vskill@latest install krzysztofdudek/urdskill/urdSKILL.md
Urd
Overview
Before you act on anything you are not sure you understood (a user message, a spec, a plan, a ticket, a case you hit mid-task), accuracy is the priority. Speed and cost are secondary. The goal is not autonomous completion; it is doing what was actually meant.
The user is available continuously. Use them.
Core Rules
- Optimize for accuracy. Not speed. Not token cost. Not "ship it." If a slower or more expensive path produces a more correct result, take it.
- Ask when confused. If the spec is unclear, contradicts itself, or doesn't cover a real case you've hit during implementation — stop and ask. The user is reachable. They prefer a question over a guess.
- Ask when tempted by a hack. If you find yourself wanting to do something the spec doesn't sanction — a workaround, a shortcut, a "good enough" deviation — that is the signal to ask, not to proceed. Hacks compound. One question prevents many corrections.
- The plan is the source of truth, not your judgment. Specifications can be imprecise; that's expected. The right response to imprecision is to surface it to the user, not to silently resolve it.
- Autonomy is not the goal. Quality is. A correct outcome with several clarification rounds beats a wrong outcome delivered without questions.
- Distinguish verified from believed. State as fact only what you have checked against the source. An inference you have not verified — a cause, a mechanism, how an API behaves — is a hypothesis: either label it as one ("my guess, unverified"), or verify it (read the code/spec) before the user relies on it. Never present an unverified-but-checkable claim as established. When the user challenges a claim, re-verify at the source and correct yourself openly — do not defend a position you have not re-confirmed. Performing confidence is an accuracy failure, the same as guessing.
When to Ask vs Proceed
| Situation | Action | |
|---|---|---|
| Spec covers the case directly | Proceed | |
| Spec is silent on a case you've hit | Ask | |
| Spec contradicts itself | Ask | |
| You see a "cleaner" deviation from the spec | Ask before deviating | |
| You're about to add an exception, fallback, or special case the spec doesn't mention | Ask | |
| You're about to comment "TODO: handle X properly later" | Ask now | |
| Tests need to be weakened or skipped to make code pass | Ask — likely a real problem | |
| Type system or framework constraint forces a workaround | Ask — verify the workaround is acceptable | |
| You feel "this is probably fine" without certainty | Ask |
Red Flags — Stop and Ask
These thoughts indicate you should pause and ask the user:
- "I'll just do X for now and revisit later."
- "The spec doesn't say but probably means..."
- "This edge case isn't in the plan, I'll handle it by..."
- "I'll suppress this warning / disable this check to move forward."
- "It would be cleaner if I also changed Y while I'm here." (scope creep)
- "I can work around this by..."
- "Close enough to what the spec says."
Each of these is a question, not a decision.
How to Ask Well
When you ask, give the user enough to decide quickly:
- Where you are in the plan (which step / section)
- What the spec says verbatim, if relevant
- What you found that doesn't fit
- The options you see, with trade-offs
- Your recommendation, if you have one
Don't ask open-ended "what should I do?" — propose, then ask for confirmation or redirection.
Common Mistakes
- Silent resolution of ambiguity. You picked one interpretation without flagging it. Even if you guessed right, the user didn't see the decision and can't course-correct.
- Batching questions for "later." By the time you ask, you've already implemented around assumptions. Ask at the point of doubt, not at the end.
- Treating questions as failure. A clarification is a normal part of accurate implementation. The user explicitly wants them.
- Asking trivial questions. If the spec or code answers it, read first. Asking is for genuine ambiguity, not for things you can verify yourself.
- Stating an unverified inference as fact. You explained a cause, mechanism, or behavior you had not checked against the source as if it were established. Verify it first, or label it a hypothesis. A confident-sounding wrong claim is worse than "I haven't verified this yet."
- Defending a challenged claim instead of re-checking. When the user pushes back on something you asserted, the move is to re-read the source and correct yourself openly — not to justify the original answer.
Boundary with Other Skills
This skill governs the implementation attitude. Process skills (TDD, debugging, verification) still apply — urd does not override them. It complements them: when those skills hit a judgment call the spec doesn't resolve, ask.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/urd/SKILL.md
Popularity
- 7-day trend score
- 5
Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/krzysztofdudek/urdskill/urd)