lis186/sourceatlas/overview

Claude Code and agent skill by lis186/sourceatlas

Trust tier 2
  • community
LLM review pending
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Get project overview - scan <5% of files to achieve 70-80% understanding

Install

npx vskill@latest install lis186/sourceatlas/overview

SKILL.md

SourceAtlas: Project Overview (Stage 0 Fingerprint)

Constitution: ANALYSIS_CONSTITUTION.md v1.0

Context

Arguments: ${ARGUMENTS:-.}

Goal: Generate project fingerprint by scanning <5% of files to achieve 70-80% understanding in 10-15 minutes.

Auto-Save: Results automatically saved to .sourceatlas/overview.yaml (or subdirectory-specific path)

Time Limit: 10-15 minutes (typically 0-5 minutes)


Cache Check (Highest Priority)

If `--force` is NOT in arguments, check cache first:

  1. Calculate cache path:
  • No path argument or .: .sourceatlas/overview.yaml
  • With path (e.g., src/api): .sourceatlas/overview-src-api.yaml
  1. Check if cache exists:

``bash ls -la .sourceatlas/overview.yaml 2>/dev/null ``

  1. If cache exists:
  • Calculate days since modification
  • Use Read tool to read cache
  • Output:

`` πŸ“ Loading cache: .sourceatlas/overview.yaml (N days ago) πŸ’‘ Add --force to re-analyze ``

  • If over 30 days: Show warning
  • Output cache content
  • End, do not execute analysis
  1. If cache does not exist: Continue with analysis

If `--force` is in arguments: Skip cache, execute analysis


Your Task

Execute Stage 0 Analysis Only - generate project fingerprint using information theory principles.

Information Theory Approach:

  • High-entropy files contain disproportionate information
  • Scan priority: Documentation β†’ Configuration β†’ Models β†’ Entry Points β†’ Tests
  • Scale-aware: TINY/SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE/VERY_LARGE projects need different approaches

Core Workflow

Execute these phases in order. See workflow.md for complete details.

Phase 1: Project Detection & Scale-Aware Planning (2-3 minutes)

Purpose: Detect project type, count files, determine scale, set scan limits.

Execute detection:

bash
# Try helper script first (recommended)
if [ -f ~/.claude/scripts/atlas/detect-project.sh ]; then
bash ~/.claude/scripts/atlas/detect-project.sh ${ARGUMENTS:-.}
elif [ -f scripts/atlas/detect-project.sh ]; then
bash scripts/atlas/detect-project.sh ${ARGUMENTS:-.}
else
echo "Warning: detect-project.sh not found, using manual detection"
fi

Scale-Aware Scan Limits:

  • TINY (<5 files): 1-2 files (50% max)
  • SMALL (5-15 files): 2-3 files (10-20%)
  • MEDIUM (15-50 files): 4-6 files (8-12%)
  • LARGE (50-150 files): 6-10 files (4-7%)
  • VERY_LARGE (>150 files): 10-15 files (3-7%)

β†’ See workflow.md#phase-1 for manual fallback

Phase 2: High-Entropy File Prioritization (5-8 minutes)

Purpose: Scan highest information-density files first.

Scan Priority Order:

  1. Documentation (README.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/)
  2. Configuration (package.json, docker-compose.yml, etc.)
  3. Core Models (models/, entities/, domain/) - pick 2-3 only
  4. Entry Points (app.ts, routes/) - pick 1-2 examples
  5. Tests - pick 1-2 examples

Execute scanning:

bash
# Use helper script if available
if [ -f ~/.claude/scripts/atlas/scan-entropy.sh ]; then
bash ~/.claude/scripts/atlas/scan-entropy.sh ${ARGUMENTS:-.}
else
echo "Warning: scan-entropy.sh not found, scanning manually"
fi

AI Tool Detection:

bash
# Detect AI collaboration level (Tier 1 + Tier 2)
if [ -f ~/.claude/scripts/atlas/detect-ai-tools.sh ]; then
bash ~/.claude/scripts/atlas/detect-ai-tools.sh ${ARGUMENTS:-.}
else
# Fallback: manual checks
ls -la CLAUDE.md .cursorrules .windsurfrules CONVENTIONS.md AGENTS.md .aiignore 2>/dev/null
ls -la .claude/ .cursor/rules/ .windsurf/rules/ .clinerules/ .roo/ .continue/rules/ .ruler/ 2>/dev/null
fi

β†’ See workflow.md#phase-2 for manual commands

Phase 3: Generate Hypotheses (3-5 minutes)

Purpose: Generate scale-appropriate hypotheses with confidence levels and evidence.

Hypothesis Categories:

  • Technology Stack: Languages, frameworks, databases, testing
  • Architecture: Patterns, structure, layering
  • Development Practices: Code quality, testing, documentation
  • AI Collaboration: Tool detection (Level 0-4)
  • Business Domain: Purpose, entities, features

Scale-Aware Targets:

  • TINY: 5-8 hypotheses
  • SMALL: 7-10 hypotheses
  • MEDIUM: 10-15 hypotheses
  • LARGE: 12-18 hypotheses
  • VERY_LARGE: 15-20 hypotheses

Each hypothesis must include:

  • hypothesis: Clear statement
  • confidence: 0.0-1.0 (aim for >0.7)
  • evidence: file:line references
  • validation_method: How to verify

β†’ See workflow.md#phase-3 for detailed guidance


Output Format

Generate output with branded header, then YAML format:

markdown
πŸ—ΊοΈ SourceAtlas: Overview
───────────────────────────────
πŸ”­ [project_name] β”‚ [SCALE] ([file count] files)

Then YAML content with sections:

  • metadata: project_name, scan_time, total_files, scanned_files, scan_ratio, project_scale, context
  • project_fingerprint: project_type, scale, primary_language, framework, architecture
  • tech_stack: backend, frontend (optional), infrastructure (optional)
  • hypotheses: architecture, tech_stack, development, ai_collaboration, business
  • scanned_files: List with file, reason, key_insight
  • summary: understanding_depth, key_findings

β†’ See output-template.md for complete YAML structure and examples


Critical Rules

  1. Scale-Aware Scanning: Follow recommended file limits from Phase 1
  2. Exclude Common Bloat: Never scan .venv/, node_modules/, vendor/, __pycache__, .git/
  3. Time Limit: Complete in 10-15 minutes (typically 0-5 minutes)
  4. Hypothesis Quality: Each must have confidence >0.7 and evidence
  5. Scale-Aware Targets: Use hypothesis targets appropriate for project scale
  6. No Deep Diving: Understand structure > implementation details
  7. STOP after Stage 0: Do not proceed to validation or git analysis

Handoffs Decision Rules

Follow Constitution Article VII: Handoffs Principles

⚠️ Choose ONE output, NOT both:

Case A - End (No Table): When any condition is met:

  • Project too small: TINY (<10 files)
  • Findings too vague: Cannot provide high confidence (>0.7) parameters
  • Goal achieved: AI collaboration Level β‰₯3 and scale TINY/SMALL

Output:

markdown
βœ… **Analysis sufficient** - Project is small, can read all files directly

Case B - Suggestions (Table): When project scale is large enough or clear next steps exist.

FindingCommandParameter
Clear patterns/sourceatlas:patternPattern name
Complex architecture/sourceatlas:flowEntry point file
Scale β‰₯ LARGE/sourceatlas:historyNo parameters
High risk areas/sourceatlas:impactRisk file/module

Format:

markdown
## Recommended Next
| # | Command | Purpose |
|---|---------|---------|
| 1 | `/sourceatlas:pattern "repository"` | Found Repository pattern in 15 files |
πŸ’‘ Enter a number (e.g., `1`) or copy the command to execute

β†’ See reference.md#handoffs for detailed logic


Self-Verification Phase (REQUIRED)

Purpose: Prevent hallucinated file paths, incorrect counts, fictional configs.
Execute AFTER output generation, BEFORE save.

Verification Steps:

Step V1: Extract Verifiable Claims

Extract from generated YAML:

  • File paths (scanned_files[].file)
  • Config files (tools_detected[].config_file)
  • File count (metadata.total_files)
  • Git branch (metadata.context.git_branch)
  • Evidence references (hypotheses.*.evidence)
Step V2: Parallel Verification

Run ALL checks in parallel:

  • Verify scanned files exist: test -f path
  • Verify AI tool configs exist: test -f config
  • Verify file count: Β±10% tolerance
  • Verify git branch: git branch --show-current
  • Verify evidence files exist
Step V3: Handle Results
  • βœ… All pass β†’ Continue to output/save
  • ⚠️ 1-2 fail β†’ Correct claims, note in summary
  • ❌ 3+ fail β†’ Re-execute analysis phases
Step V4: Verification Summary

Add to footer:

If all passed:

βœ… Verified: [N] scanned files, [M] config paths, file count

If corrected:

πŸ”§ Self-corrected: [list corrections]
βœ… Verified: [N] scanned files, [M] config paths, file count

β†’ See verification-guide.md for complete checklist and examples


Auto-Save (Default Behavior)

After verification passes, automatically:

  1. Create directory: mkdir -p .sourceatlas
  2. Save YAML output to:
  • Root: .sourceatlas/overview.yaml
  • Subdirectory: .sourceatlas/overview-[path].yaml
  1. Confirm: πŸ’Ύ Saved to .sourceatlas/overview.yaml

β†’ See reference.md#auto-save for details


Advanced


Output Header

Start your output with:

markdown
πŸ—ΊοΈ SourceAtlas: Overview
───────────────────────────────
πŸ”­ [project_name] β”‚ [SCALE] ([file count] files)

Then follow YAML structure in output-template.md.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
35
Repository forks
1
7-day trend score
18

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Refreshed 25 Mar 2026, 7 months ago.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/lis186/sourceatlas/overview/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/lis186/sourceatlas/overview)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.