luanmorenommaciel/agentspec/excalidraw-diagram

Claude Code and agent skill by luanmorenommaciel/agentspec

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Create Excalidraw diagram JSON files that make visual arguments. Use when the user wants to visualize workflows, architectures, or concepts.

Install

npx vskill@latest install luanmorenommaciel/agentspec/excalidraw-diagram

SKILL.md

Excalidraw Diagram Creator

Generate .excalidraw JSON files that argue visually, not just display information.

Setup: Ensure the required dependencies are available in the environment. See the First-Time Setup section below (under Render & Validate) for the exact install commands.

Customization

All colors and brand-specific styles live in one file: references/color-palette.md. Read it before generating any diagram and use it as the single source of truth for all color choices — shape fills, strokes, text colors, evidence artifact backgrounds, everything.

To make this skill produce diagrams in your own brand style, edit color-palette.md. Everything else in this file is universal design methodology and Excalidraw best practices.


Core Philosophy

Diagrams should ARGUE, not DISPLAY.

A diagram isn't formatted text. It's a visual argument that shows relationships, causality, and flow that words alone can't express. The shape should BE the meaning.

The Isomorphism Test: If you removed all text, would the structure alone communicate the concept? If not, redesign.

The Education Test: Could someone learn something concrete from this diagram, or does it just label boxes? A good diagram teaches—it shows actual formats, real event names, concrete examples.


Depth Assessment (Do This First)

Before designing, determine what level of detail this diagram needs:

Simple/Conceptual Diagrams

Use abstract shapes when:

  • Explaining a mental model or philosophy
  • The audience doesn't need technical specifics
  • The concept IS the abstraction (e.g., "separation of concerns")
Comprehensive/Technical Diagrams

Use concrete examples when:

  • Diagramming a real system, protocol, or architecture
  • The diagram will be used to teach or explain (e.g., YouTube video)
  • The audience needs to understand what things actually look like
  • You're showing how multiple technologies integrate

For technical diagrams, you MUST include evidence artifacts (see below).


Research Mandate (For Technical Diagrams)

Before drawing anything technical, research the actual specifications.

If you're diagramming a protocol, API, or framework:

  1. Look up the actual JSON/data formats
  2. Find the real event names, method names, or API endpoints
  3. Understand how the pieces actually connect
  4. Use real terminology, not generic placeholders

Bad: "Protocol" → "Frontend" Good: "AG-UI streams events (RUN_STARTED, STATE_DELTA, A2UI_UPDATE)" → "CopilotKit renders via createA2UIMessageRenderer()"

Research makes diagrams accurate AND educational.


Evidence Artifacts

Evidence artifacts are concrete examples that prove your diagram is accurate and help viewers learn. Include them in technical diagrams.

Types of evidence artifacts (choose what's relevant to your diagram):

Artifact TypeWhen to UseHow to Render
Code snippetsAPIs, integrations, implementation detailsDark rectangle + syntax-colored text (see color palette for evidence artifact colors)
Data/JSON examplesData formats, schemas, payloadsDark rectangle + colored text (see color palette)
Event/step sequencesProtocols, workflows, lifecyclesTimeline pattern (line + dots + labels)
UI mockupsShowing actual output/resultsNested rectangles mimicking real UI
Real input contentShowing what goes IN to a systemRectangle with sample content visible
API/method namesReal function calls, endpointsUse actual names from docs, not placeholders

Example: For a diagram about a streaming protocol, you might show:

  • The actual event names from the spec (not just "Event 1", "Event 2")
  • A code snippet showing how to connect
  • What the streamed data actually looks like

Example: For a diagram about a data transformation pipeline:

  • Show sample input data (actual format, not "Input")
  • Show sample output data (actual format, not "Output")
  • Show intermediate states if relevant

The key principle: show what things actually look like, not just what they're called.


Multi-Zoom Architecture

Comprehensive diagrams operate at multiple zoom levels simultaneously. Think of it like a map that shows both the country borders AND the street names.

Level 1: Summary Flow

A simplified overview showing the full pipeline or process at a glance. Often placed at the top or bottom of the diagram.

Example: Input → Processing → Output or Client → Server → Database

Level 2: Section Boundaries

Labeled regions that group related components. These create visual "rooms" that help viewers understand what belongs together.

Example: Grouping by responsibility (Backend / Frontend), by phase (Setup / Execution / Cleanup), or by team (User / System / External)

Level 3: Detail Inside Sections

Evidence artifacts, code snippets, and concrete examples within each section. This is where the educational value lives.

Example: Inside a "Backend" section, you might show the actual API response format, not just a box labeled "API Response"

For comprehensive diagrams, aim to include all three levels. The summary gives context, the sections organize, and the details teach.

Bad vs Good
Bad (Displaying)Good (Arguing)
5 equal boxes with labelsEach concept has a shape that mirrors its behavior
Card grid layoutVisual structure matches conceptual structure
Icons decorating textShapes that ARE the meaning
Same container for everythingDistinct visual vocabulary per concept
Everything in a boxFree-floating text with selective containers
Simple vs Comprehensive (Know Which You Need)
Simple DiagramComprehensive Diagram
Generic labels: "Input" → "Process" → "Output"Specific: shows what the input/output actually looks like
Named boxes: "API", "Database", "Client"Named boxes + examples of actual requests/responses
"Events" or "Messages" labelTimeline with real event/message names from the spec
"UI" or "Dashboard" rectangleMockup showing actual UI elements and content
~30 seconds to explain~2-3 minutes of teaching content
Viewer learns the structureViewer learns the structure AND the details

Simple diagrams are fine for abstract concepts, quick overviews, or when the audience already knows the details. Comprehensive diagrams are needed for technical architectures, tutorials, educational content, or when you want the diagram itself to teach.


Container vs. Free-Floating Text

Not every piece of text needs a shape around it. Default to free-floating text. Add containers only when they serve a purpose.

Use a Container When...Use Free-Floating Text When...
It's the focal point of a sectionIt's a label or description
It needs visual grouping with other elementsIt's supporting detail or metadata
Arrows need to connect to itIt describes something nearby
The shape itself carries meaning (decision diamond, etc.)Typography alone creates sufficient hierarchy
It represents a distinct "thing" in the systemIt's a section title, subtitle, or annotation

Typography as hierarchy: Use font size, weight, and color to create visual hierarchy without boxes. A 28px title doesn't need a rectangle around it.

The container test: For each boxed element, ask "Would this work as free-floating text?" If yes, remove the container.


Design Process (Do This BEFORE Generating JSON)

Step 0: Assess Depth Required

Before anything else, determine if this needs to be:

  • Simple/Conceptual: Abstract shapes, labels, relationships (mental models, philosophies)
  • Comprehensive/Technical: Concrete examples, code snippets, real data (systems, architectures, tutorials)

If comprehensive: Do research first. Look up actual specs, formats, event names, APIs.

Step 1: Understand Deeply

Read the content. For each concept, ask:

  • What does this concept DO? (not what IS it)
  • What relationships exist between concepts?
  • What's the core transformation or flow?
  • What would someone need to SEE to understand this? (not just read about)
Step 2: Map Concepts to Patterns

For each concept, find the visual pattern that mirrors its behavior:

If the concept...Use this pattern
Spawns multiple outputsFan-out (radial arrows from center)
Combines inputs into oneConvergence (funnel, arrows merging)
Has hierarchy/nestingTree (lines + free-floating text)
Is a sequence of stepsTimeline (line + dots + free-floating labels)
Loops or improves continuouslySpiral/Cycle (arrow returning to start)
Is an abstract state or contextCloud (overlapping ellipses)
Transforms input to outputAssembly line (before → process → after)
Compares two thingsSide-by-side (parallel with contrast)
Separates into phasesGap/Break (visual separation between sections)
Step 3: Ensure Variety

For multi-concept diagrams: each major concept must use a different visual pattern. No uniform cards or grids.

Step 4: Sketch the Flow

Before JSON, mentally trace how the eye moves through the diagram. There should be a clear visual story.

Step 5: Generate JSON

Only now create the Excalidraw elements. See below for how to handle large diagrams.

Step 6: Render & Validate (MANDATORY)

After generating the JSON, you MUST run the render-view-fix loop until the diagram looks right. This is not optional — see the Render & Validate section below for the full process.


Large / Comprehensive Diagram Strategy

For comprehensive or technical diagrams, you MUST build the JSON one section at a time. Do NOT attempt to generate the entire file in a single pass. This is a hard constraint — Claude Code has a ~32,000 token output limit per response, and a comprehensive diagram easily exceeds that in one shot. Even if it didn't, generating everything at once leads to worse quality. Section-by-section is better in every way.

The Section-by-Section Workflow

Phase 1: Build each section

  1. Create the base file with the JSON wrapper (type, version, appState, files) and the first section of elements.
  2. Add one section per edit. Each section gets its own dedicated pass — take your time with it. Think carefully about the layout, spacing, and how this section connects to what's already there.
  3. Use descriptive string IDs (e.g., "trigger_rect", "arrow_fan_left") so cross-section references are readable.
  4. Namespace seeds by section (e.g., section 1 uses 100xxx, section 2 uses 200xxx) to avoid collisions.
  5. Update cross-section bindings as you go. When a new section's element needs to bind to an element from a previous section (e.g., an arrow connecting sections), edit the earlier element's boundElements array at the same time.

Phase 2: Review the whole

After all sections are in place, read through the complete JSON and check:

  • Are cross-section arrows bound correctly on both ends?
  • Is the overall spacing balanced, or are some sections cramped while others have too much whitespace?
  • Do IDs and bindings all reference elements that actually exist?

Fix any alignment or binding issues before rendering.

Phase 3: Render & validate

Now run the render-view-fix loop from the Render & Validate section. This is where you'll catch visual issues that aren't obvious from JSON — overlaps, clipping, imbalanced composition.

Section Boundaries

Plan your sections around natural visual groupings from the diagram plan. A typical large diagram might split into:

This is the start of the file. Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
176
Repository forks
87
7-day trend score
26

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Refreshed 16 May 2026, 5 months ago.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/luanmorenommaciel/agentspec/excalidraw-diagram/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/luanmorenommaciel/agentspec/excalidraw-diagram)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.