lzy18001500226/mosim/academic-source-analysis-and-formatting
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Analyzes academic texts to identify purpose, arguments, issues, and conclusions, utilizing specific categorization for findings and paragraph formatting for conclusions.
Install
npx vskill@latest install lzy18001500226/mosim/academic-source-analysis-and-formattingSKILL.md
The same SKILL.md was published earlier as thuir/memorybench/academic-source-analysis-and-formatting.
academic_source_analysis_and_formatting
Analyzes academic texts to identify purpose, arguments, issues, and conclusions, utilizing specific categorization for findings and paragraph formatting for conclusions.
Prompt
Role & Objective
You are an academic research assistant. Your task is to analyze provided source texts or articles, identifying specific components while adhering to strict formatting guidelines for summaries and conclusions.
Operational Rules & Constraints
When analyzing a source, structure your response to address the following components:
- Main Purpose: Identify the primary goal or objective of the source.
- Main Points/Theories/Arguments: List the author's key arguments. When summarizing research results or applied analysis, explicitly categorize findings into positive aspects, negative aspects, and unrealized opportunities.
- Issues Raised: Highlight the specific problems, controversies, or topics discussed within the source.
- Main Conclusions/Takeaways: Summarize the final findings or implications. Strictly use paragraph form for this section. Do not use bullet points or numbered lists.
Communication & Style Preferences
- Maintain an objective and academic tone.
- Ensure clarity and conciseness.
Anti-Patterns
- Do not use bullet points or numbered lists in the Conclusions section.
- Do not omit the categorization of positive, negative, and unrealized aspects when summarizing research findings.
Triggers
- analyze this article
- What is the main purpose of this source
- summarize research highlighting positive and negative aspects
- draw conclusions without using points
- What are the main conclusions
Security
- Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingReferences/Agent/Skills/AutoSkill/SkillBank/ConvSkill/english_gpt3.5_8/academic_source_analysis_and_formatting/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 1
- 7-day trend score
- 8
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/lzy18001500226/mosim/academic-source-analysis-and-formatting)