madappgang/claude-code/ab-testing-patterns

Trust tier 2
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

A/B testing methodology for cold email optimization

Install

npx vskill@latest install madappgang/claude-code/ab-testing-patterns

SKILL.md

plugin: instantly updated: 2026-01-20

A/B Testing Patterns

Testing Fundamentals

One Variable at a Time

CRITICAL: Only change one element per test for clear attribution.

Test TypeVariableKeep Same
Subject LineSubject onlyBody, CTA, timing
Opening LineFirst sentenceSubject, rest of body
CTACall to actionSubject, body intro
Send TimeDelivery timeAll copy elements
Sample Size Requirements
Confidence LevelMinimum Sample per Variant
90%100
95% (standard)150
99%200

Formula:

sample_size = (Z^2 * p * (1-p)) / E^2
Where:
Z = 1.96 for 95% confidence
p = expected conversion rate (use 0.5 if unknown)
E = margin of error (typically 0.05)

Subject Line Testing

Test Categories
CategoryControl ExampleVariant Example
Curiosity vs Specific"Quick question""2 min about {{company}}'s pipeline"
Personal vs Generic"{{first_name}}, saw this""Your team might like this"
Question vs Statement"Struggling with X?""How we fixed X for [Company]"
Short vs Medium"Quick win?""{{first_name}}, 2 ideas for {{company}}"
Best Practices
  1. Test 2-3 variants maximum - More variants require more sample
  2. Run for minimum 3 days - Account for daily patterns
  3. Test during stable periods - Avoid holidays, major events
  4. Document everything - Record hypothesis, results, learnings

Body Copy Testing

Elements to Test
ElementLow-LiftHigh-Lift
Opening hookDifferent pain pointDifferent approach entirely
Social proofDifferent company nameNo social proof
Value propositionReframe benefitDifferent benefit
CTASoft vs hard askDifferent action
Copy Frameworks to Test

PAS vs AIDA:

  • PAS: Problem-Agitate-Solution (emotional)
  • AIDA: Attention-Interest-Desire-Action (logical)

Test Hypothesis: PAS performs better for pain-point-heavy ICPs, AIDA for solution-seekers.

Timing Tests

Variables to Test
VariableOptions to Test
Day of weekTue vs Thu (typically best)
Time of day8-10am vs 2-4pm
TimezoneSend in prospect's local time vs batch send
Sequence gaps2-day vs 3-day follow-up gaps
Default Schedule (Starting Point)
Optimal Sending Windows:
Primary: Tuesday-Thursday, 9-11am local time
Secondary: Tuesday-Thursday, 2-4pm local time
Avoid: Monday morning, Friday afternoon

Statistical Significance

Quick Significance Check
Total SampleLift Needed for 95% Confidence
200 (100 per variant)15%+ lift
500 (250 per variant)10%+ lift
1000 (500 per variant)7%+ lift
Decision Framework
IF lift >= 15% AND sample >= 100/variant:
Declare winner with medium confidence
IF lift >= 10% AND sample >= 250/variant:
Declare winner with high confidence
IF lift < 10% OR sample < 100/variant:
Continue test or call it inconclusive

Implementing A/B Tests in Instantly

Method 1: Split Leads
  1. Export lead list
  2. Randomly split into Variant A and Variant B groups
  3. Create two identical campaigns with one variable different
  4. Use move_leads_to_campaign to assign leads
Method 2: Sequential Testing
  1. Run Control for X days, collect metrics
  2. Update campaign with Variant (update_campaign_sequence)
  3. Run Variant for X days, collect metrics
  4. Compare (less rigorous, use only if lead volume is limited)
Tracking Results
markdown
## A/B Test Log
**Test ID**: {uuid}
**Campaign**: {campaign_name}
**Variable**: {what_was_tested}
**Hypothesis**: {expected_outcome}
**Control**:
-Version: {control_description}
-Sample: {n}
-Open Rate: {x}%
-Reply Rate: {y}%
**Variant**:
-Version: {variant_description}
-Sample: {n}
-Open Rate: {x}%
-Reply Rate: {y}%
**Result**: {Winner|Inconclusive}
**Lift**: {z}%
**Confidence**: {confidence}%
**Learning**: {what_we_learned}

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
255
Repository forks
31
7-day trend score
28

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Refreshed 3 May 2026, 5 months ago.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/madappgang/claude-code/ab-testing-patterns/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/madappgang/claude-code/ab-testing-patterns)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.