magnus919/hermes-profiles/technology-radar

Claude Code and agent skill by magnus919/hermes-profiles

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

CTO methodology for technology evaluation, architecture governance, build-vs-buy decisions, engineering metrics, technical debt quantification, and innovation pipeline management. Covers technology radar framework (Adopt/Trial/Assess/Hold), TCO analysis, architecture review boards, RFC processes, DORA/SPACE/DevEx metrics, debt interest calculation, and POC-to-production readiness criteria.

Install

npx vskill@latest install magnus919/hermes-profiles/technology-radar

SKILL.md

Technology Radar

CTO methodology for making technology decisions, governing architecture, measuring engineering effectiveness, managing technical debt, and operating an innovation pipeline. These frameworks help a CTO balance short-term delivery velocity with long-term platform health.

Domain Model

DomainCoversArtifact
Technology RadarAdopt/Trial/Assess/Hold quadrants, tool selection criteria, deprecation policyTechnology radar document
Build vs BuyTCO analysis, decision matrices, vendor evaluation, integration costBuild-vs-buy recommendation
Architecture GovernanceStandards, review boards, RFC process, design reviewsADRs, RFC documents, governance charter
Engineering MetricsDORA (deploy frequency, lead time, MTTR, change failure rate), SPACE, DevExEngineering dashboard, health report
Technical DebtInterest calculation, remediation prioritization, principal estimationTechnical debt register
Innovation PipelineHorizon scanning, POC criteria, production readiness gatesInnovation funnel, POC report

When to Load

Load this skill when the task involves:

  • Evaluating a new technology or tool for adoption
  • Making a build-vs-buy decision with TCO analysis
  • Designing or auditing architecture governance processes
  • Setting up engineering metrics dashboards (DORA, SPACE)
  • Quantifying and prioritizing technical debt remediation
  • Running an innovation pipeline with POC-to-production gates
  • Deprecating or retiring legacy technology
  • Conducting an architecture review board session

Loading Order

skill_view('technology-radar') # This — methodology index
skill_view('executive-methodology') # Shared decision frameworks
skill_view('artifact-pyramids') # Output contract
skill_view('technology-radar', file_path='references/technology-radar.md')
skill_view('technology-radar', file_path='references/build-vs-buy.md')
skill_view('technology-radar', file_path='references/architecture-governance.md')
skill_view('technology-radar', file_path='references/engineering-metrics.md')

Reference Files

ReferenceLoad WhenFile
Technology RadarYou need to evaluate and categorize a technology or tool for adoption, trial, assessment, or holdreferences/technology-radar.md
Build vs BuyYou're comparing build vs buy options with TCO analysis and decision criteriareferences/build-vs-buy.md
Architecture GovernanceYou're designing RFC processes, review boards, or architecture standardsreferences/architecture-governance.md
Engineering MetricsYou need to measure engineering effectiveness with DORA, SPACE, or DevEx frameworksreferences/engineering-metrics.md

Design Principles

  1. Technology is a means, not an end. Every technology decision must trace back to a business outcome. "Because it's new" is not a reason to adopt. "Because it solves X faster/safer/cheaper" is.
  2. Radar is a living document. A technology radar updated once a year is a museum. Update it quarterly, or every time a significant adoption/hold/promote/promote-to-trial decision is made.
  3. Build vs buy is never just cost. Total Cost of Ownership includes maintenance, hiring, training, integration, migration, and opportunity cost. A cheaper build today may be vastly more expensive over 3 years.
  4. Engineering metrics measure the system, not the people. DORA metrics measure the delivery capability of the org. SPACE measures developer satisfaction. Neither is a performance review tool for individuals.
  5. Technical debt has a principal and an interest payment. The principal is the cost to fix it properly. The interest is the recurring drag on velocity. Prioritize debt where interest/principal ratio is highest.
  6. Production readiness gates exist to prevent crisis. Every gate that is skipped in the name of speed will be paid for in incident response time later.

Related Skills

  • executive-methodology — shared decision frameworks and governance
  • operational-design — COO-side process design and scaling
  • artifact-pyramids — output contract specification
  • platform-engineering — infrastructure and CI/CD implementation patterns

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
7
7-day trend score
10

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/magnus919/hermes-profiles/technology-radar/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/magnus919/hermes-profiles/technology-radar)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.