version: "1.0.0" name: project-complexity-mapper description: > Diagnose project complexity from a rough project description using the DelftX TOE framework and detail/dynamic complexity model. Use when the user wants to map, score, visualize, or understand project complexity; create a TOE matrix; generate a quadrant chart; or choose a fit-for-purpose management approach.

Project Complexity Mapper

Turn a rough project description, project idea, or messy notes into a structured complexity diagnosis. The output is a TOE assessment, overall and hotspot quadrants, a Mermaid quadrant chart, and management-fit guidance.

This skill is diagnostic only. Do not create an action plan. End with a short human-readable handoff table that another planning skill can use.

Core Workflow

1. Read the user's project description.
2. Run a fast first-pass complexity scan by default.
3. Infer likely Technical, Organizational, and External complexity elements.
4. Ask only the few questions needed to resolve high-impact uncertainty.
5. Score relevant elements by TOE contribution, detail complexity, dynamic

complexity, impact, severity, and confidence.

1. Output the report using references/output-format.md.
2. Include both overall project quadrant and per-hotspot quadrants.
3. Include a Mermaid quadrant chart for the main hotspots.
4. End with a human-readable handoff table.

Assessment Modes

Default mode: Fast Complexity Scan.

• Use the user's free-form description as input.
• Infer likely TOE elements from the description.
• Ask only high-value clarification questions.
• Do not walk through all 47 TOE elements.
• Mark low-confidence scores clearly.

Complete mode: Full TOE Assessment.

• Before switching, ask the user if they want the complete 47-element assessment.
• Load references/toe-elements.md.
• Walk through all TOE elements.
• Score each element from 1 to 5.
• Separate user evidence from AI inference.
• Mark confidence for every score.

Use complete mode only when the user explicitly asks for it or agrees after being asked.

References

Load only what is needed:

• references/output-format.md: required when producing final report.
• references/scoring-rules.md: required when assigning scores, severity, and confidence.
• references/management-approaches.md: required when recommending management fit.
• references/toe-elements.md: required for complete 47-element assessment, optional for fast scan if element names are needed.

Input Rules

Accept free-form project descriptions, rough thoughts, copied notes, or partially structured text. Do not require JSON, YAML, templates, or forms.

Keep the interview light. Ask one question at a time only when the answer would change the diagnosis materially.

Do not add a stakeholder-question section. It is fine to note that complexity is subjective and should be reassessed with other perspectives, but do not generate stakeholder interview questions.

Complexity Principles

• Complexity is subjective: different actors can perceive the same project

differently.

• Complexity evolves over the project lifecycle.
• TOE dimensions are Technical, Organizational, and External.
• Detail complexity means many parts, interfaces, dependencies, or disciplines.
• Dynamic complexity means uncertainty, change, limited predictability, shifting

actors, or unstable context.

• Severity is based on TOE contribution plus impact on project progress.
• Do not flatten the project into one average. Preserve hotspots.
• The goal is fit-for-purpose management, not generic project management advice.

Output Rules

Use the structure in references/output-format.md.

Required sections:

1. Summary
2. Findings by Category
3. Quadrant Matrix
4. Overall Quadrant
5. Hotspot Quadrants
6. Complexity Map
7. Management Fit
8. Handoff

Do not include:

• Action plan
• Stakeholder questions
• "What's Already Strong" section
• Machine-readable block
• JSON/YAML input or output mode