martin-hausleitner/martins-awesome-skills/tool-comparison-heatmap
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Create interactive feature-comparison heatmaps that score, rank, and crown winners across multiple tools, repos, or products. Use this skill whenever the user asks to compare tools, software, GitHub repos, frameworks, extensions, or any set of alternatives across multiple features or criteria — especially when they want a visual matrix, heatmap, scorecard, ranking, or 'who wins' analysis. Also trigger when the user says things like 'compare features', 'which is the best', 'feature matrix', 'score them 1-100', 'rank these tools', 'Vergleich', 'Heatmap', 'wer gewinnt', or 'Gewinner küren'. The output is always an interactive React (.jsx) artifact with clickable GitHub/repo links, last-update dates, color-coded scores, sorting, and an automatic winner badge.
Install
npx vskill@latest install martin-hausleitner/martins-awesome-skills/tool-comparison-heatmapSKILL.md
Tool Comparison Heatmap Skill
Create a polished, interactive React heatmap that compares tools/repos across user-defined features, scores each 0–100, links to repositories, shows last-update dates, and automatically crowns the winner(s).
When to Use
- User wants to compare multiple tools, repos, frameworks, extensions, or products
- User asks for a feature matrix, heatmap, scorecard, or ranking
- User wants to know "which is the best" across several criteria
- User mentions "Gewinner küren", "wer gewinnt", "score them", "rank", "compare features"
Research Phase
Before building the heatmap, gather accurate data:
- Identify the tools the user wants to compare (aim for 5–30)
- Define feature categories — ask the user or derive from context. Typical categories:
- Technical capabilities (e.g., multi-tab, parallel agents, self-healing)
- Ecosystem (e.g., BYOK, open source, MCP support, Chrome extension)
- Usability (e.g., no-code, voice, memory/persistence)
- Trust (e.g., privacy, license, community size)
- Research each tool using web search:
- GitHub URL (exact, verified)
- GitHub stars (current count)
- Last meaningful update date (check releases page or recent commits)
- Feature support level per category
- Score each feature 0–100 based on research:
- 85–100: Excellent / native support / best-in-class
- 65–84: Good / solid support with minor gaps
- 45–64: Partial / workaround needed / experimental
- 25–44: Weak / very limited
- 0–24: Missing / not applicable
Output Requirements
Generate a single .jsx React artifact with ALL of the following:
1. Data Structure
2. Interactive Table
- Sticky first column with tool name, type, stars, and last-update date
- Tool name is a clickable link → opens the GitHub repo in a new tab (
target="_blank") - Last update shown as subtle text below the name (e.g., "Letztes Update: Apr 2026")
- Stars shown as
⭐ ~12.6k - Color-coded score cells: green (85+), teal (65-84), amber (45-64), red (0-44)
- Sortable columns: click any header to sort ascending/descending
- Click any cell → shows detail panel below with the note/explanation
3. Winner Badge
- Calculate average score (
total) across all features for each tool - Display a 🏆 trophy column or winner row at the top
- The tool with the highest average gets a visible
🏆 Gewinnerbadge - If user asked for category winners, also show per-feature winners
4. Styling
- Use CSS variables for theming (works in light/dark mode)
- Font: import a distinctive Google Font (e.g., DM Sans, Plus Jakarta Sans)
- Monospace font for scores (e.g., JetBrains Mono)
- Alternating row backgrounds for readability
- Responsive horizontal scroll for many columns
- Frosted/blurred detail panel on cell click
5. Winner Summary Box
Below the table, add a colored summary box:
🏆 Gesamtsieger: [Tool Name] mit Ø [Score]/100- List top 3 tools with their average scores
- Per-category leaders:
Bester bei [Feature]: [Tool] ([Score]) - If the user's question had a specific focus (e.g.,
wer kann parallele Tab-Gruppen), highlight that category winner prominently
Template Code Structure
Critical Rules
- Every GitHub link must be verified — search the web to confirm the URL exists. Never guess.
- Last update date must be researched — check the repo's releases or commit history.
- Stars must be current — use web search to find the latest count.
- Tool names must be clickable links — use
<a href={tool.github} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">. - Winner must be automatically calculated — not hardcoded.
- The artifact must be a single
.jsxfile — no separate CSS files. - All text in the user's language — if user speaks German, labels/descriptions in German.
Example Invocations
Vergleiche die 10 besten Browser-Extensions mit einer HeatmapScore these 5 AI coding tools across speed, accuracy, and costWer gewinnt bei Multi-Tab-Steuerung? Mach eine VergleichstabelleCreate a feature matrix of React state management librariesRank these databases 1-100 on performance, scalability, and ease of use
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/analysis/tool-comparison-heatmap/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 4
- Repository forks
- 1
- 7-day trend score
- 0
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/martin-hausleitner/martins-awesome-skills/tool-comparison-heatmap)