Skill v1.0.1
currentAutomated scan100/100+6 new
version: "1.0.1" name: generate-requirement-drafts description: "Generates draft requirements from Simulink models. Use when drafting or updating requirement artifacts from a model. Prefers Requirements Toolbox (.slreqx) when available; falls back to structured YAML." license: MathWorks BSD-3-Clause metadata: author: MathWorks version: "2.2"
Generate Requirement Drafts
Generate draft requirements from Simulink models using the richest artifact the environment supports. All outputs are drafts requiring human review and approval before baselining.
When to Use
- Drafting or updating requirements from a Simulink model
- Creating
.slreqxor.yamlrequirements artifacts - Establishing model-to-requirement traceability
When NOT to Use
- Importing requirements from an existing source of truth (ReqIF, DOORS, Word, Excel) — use Requirements Toolbox import APIs directly
- Writing or running tests — use the
testing-simulink-modelsskill - Free-form prose notes with no saved artifact
- User explicitly wants a different text format (markdown, Word)
Output Conventions
- Default file names:
<Model>_Requirements.slreqxor<model>_requirements.yaml - Stable IDs:
REQ_<SYSTEM>_001,REQ_<SYSTEM>_002, … - Follow repo conventions if
.slreqxor.yamlfiles already exist - When updating an existing artifact, preserve existing IDs — append new IDs, never renumber
- Every generated requirement must be marked as draft — use
"draft"in Keywords (slreq) orstatus: Draft+keywords: [draft](YAML)
Writing Good Requirements
Requirements must express behavioral intent (WHAT the system shall do), not restate model topology (HOW it is implemented). Put the WHY in Rationale. Use EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) patterns:
EARS Patterns
Choose the pattern that best fits the model behavior:
| Pattern | Template | When to Use | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubiquitous | The \<system\> shall \<response\>. | Always-on behavior, invariants | |
| Event-driven | When \<trigger\>, the \<system\> shall \<response\>. | Triggered subsystems, Stateflow transitions, input events | |
| State-driven | While \<state\>, the \<system\> shall \<response\>. | Stateflow states, mode-dependent behavior | |
| Unwanted behavior | If \<condition\>, then the \<system\> shall \<response\>. | Error handling, safety limits, saturation | |
| Optional feature | Where \<feature\>, the \<system\> shall \<response\>. | Variant subsystems, configurable features | |
| Combined | While \<state\>, when \<trigger\>, the \<system\> shall \<response\>. | State + event combinations |
Examples — Model Concepts to EARS Requirements
| ❌ Bad — restates implementation | ✅ Good — EARS pattern | |
|---|---|---|
| "Saturation block limits output to [0,1]" | "If throttle command exceeds ThrottleMax (1.0) or falls below ThrottleMin (0.0), then the controller shall clamp the output to the valid range." | |
| "BrakeLogic subsystem disengages controller" | "When brake pedal input exceeds BrakeThreshold (0.0), the controller shall disengage cruise control." | |
| "Gain block multiplies by 2.5" | "While cruise control is active, the controller shall amplify speed error by Kp (2.5) to compute proportional correction." | |
| "Stateflow chart transitions to Idle" | "When the driver presses the off button, the system shall transition to the Idle state." | |
| "Variant subsystem selects Algorithm A" | "Where the adaptive mode is enabled, the controller shall use the predictive algorithm." |
Rules
- Write requirements using EARS patterns — pick the pattern that matches the model behavior
- Use block/subsystem names only in
Rationaleor provenance notes, not in the requirementSummary - When referencing a numeric value, include the workspace variable name and resolved value:
VarName (value). If the model uses a literal with no variable, record the numeric literal directly - Put the WHY in
Rationale, not in the requirement statement - One subsystem may support zero, one, or several behavioral requirements — don't force a 1:1 mapping
Backend Decision Gate
Choose once at the start, then stay on that path.
| Situation | Backend | |
|---|---|---|
User explicitly asks for .slreqx, traceability views, or repo already uses .slreqx | Requirements Toolbox — if probe fails, inform the user that Requirements Toolbox is unavailable; do NOT silently fall back | |
User explicitly asks for .yaml, or repo already uses .yaml requirements | Structured YAML | |
| No format specified — probe for Requirements Toolbox | Requirements Toolbox if probe succeeds | |
| No format specified and probe fails | Structured YAML (silent fallback is OK here since user had no preference) |
Probe (run via evaluate_matlab_code):
hasSlreq = ~isempty(which('slreq.new'));if hasSlreq, try, slreq.find(Type="Link"); catch, hasSlreq = false; end, enddisp(hasSlreq)
Workflow
- Understand the model — use
model_overviewandmodel_readto understand subsystems, interfaces, control logic. - Extract parameters — use
model_query_params/model_resolve_paramsfor thresholds, gains, sample times that should appear in requirement text. Record both variable names and resolved values. - Build a capture table (backend-neutral):
| Id | ParentId | Summary | Description | SourceBlock | Rationale | ASIL | Priority | Keywords |
|---|
- Run the backend path (A or B below).
- Review using the gate below.
Path A — Requirements Toolbox (.slreqx)
Use when probe succeeds. For full API patterns see references/slreq-patterns.md.
model = "CruiseControl";load_system(model);rs = slreq.new(model + "_Requirements");% Add requirements with hierarchy — note behavioral "shall" statementsreq = add(rs, Id="REQ_CC_001", ...Summary="If throttle command exceeds ThrottleMax (1.0) or falls below ThrottleMin (0.0), then the controller shall clamp the output to the valid range.", ...Description="Derived from CruiseControl/ThrottleCmd.");req.Rationale = "Prevents invalid actuator commands that could damage the throttle body.";req.Keywords = ["draft","auto-generated","control","safety"];child = add(req, Id="REQ_CC_002", ...Summary="When brake pedal input exceeds BrakeThreshold (0.0), the controller shall disengage cruise control.", ...Description="Derived from CruiseControl/BrakeLogic.");child.Keywords = ["draft","auto-generated","safety","brake"];% Create traceability links: use block handle from SID (blk_X → X) for robustnesslnk = slreq.createLink(Simulink.ID.getHandle(model + ":5"), req);slreq.createLink(Simulink.ID.getHandle(model + ":8"), child);save(rs);% Save all link setslinkSets = slreq.find(Type="LinkSet");for i = 1:numel(linkSets), save(linkSets(i)); end
Link rules:
- Source = model element, destination = requirement → link type is automatically
Implement - Prefer subsystem-level links; use block-level only when the requirement is block-specific
- Every model-derived requirement must have at least one traceability link
- The model must be loaded (
load_system) before creating links with block paths
Path B — Structured YAML fallback
Use when Requirements Toolbox is unavailable. For schema and field rules see references/yaml-requirements.md.
- Generate a
<model>_requirements.yamlfile from the capture table - Set
status: Draftand includedraftinkeywordsfor every requirement - Self-review: all required fields set,
asil/status/priorityuse valid values, IDs sequential,derived_fromreferences valid IDs or isnull - Validate:
python -c "import yaml, sys; yaml.safe_load(open(sys.argv[1])); print('OK')" path/to/requirements.yaml
Guardrails
| Always | Never | |
|---|---|---|
| Mark every generated requirement as DRAFT | Emit markdown or ad hoc text when .slreqx is available and no text format was requested | |
| Write requirements using EARS patterns | Restate block topology as the requirement summary | |
Include parameter name + value: VarName (value) | Create both .slreqx and .yaml unless user asks for both | |
| Link direction: model element → requirement | Reverse the link direction (requirement → block) | |
load_system before creating traceability links | Over-link every primitive block — prefer subsystem links | |
| Use only R2023a+ APIs | Silently fall back to YAML when user explicitly requested .slreqx | |
| Stay consistent with existing repo format | Renumber existing requirement IDs on regeneration |
Review Gate
Before finishing, verify (both backends):
- [ ] Every requirement has
Id,Summary, andDescription - [ ] Every requirement is marked as DRAFT (via Keywords or status field)
- [ ] Summaries use EARS patterns, not block-topology restatements
- [ ] Numeric values include parameter name + value where a workspace variable exists
- [ ] IDs are stable and sequential; existing IDs preserved on regeneration
slreq path only:
- [ ] Model-derived requirements have a traceability link to the source model element
- [ ] Link direction is model element → requirement (not reversed)
- [ ] Subsystem-level linking preferred over block-level
- [ ] Requirement set and all link sets are saved
YAML path only:
- [ ] File parses without errors
- [ ]
asilandpriorityuse valid enum values (orUnsetwhen unknown)
References
references/slreq-patterns.md— Requirements Toolbox API cookbookreferences/yaml-requirements.md— Structured YAML schema and field rulesreferences/examples/slreq_from_model.m— End-to-end slreq examplereferences/examples/requirements.yaml— Structured YAML example
Copyright 2026 The MathWorks, Inc.