meain/dotfiles/advisor

Claude Code and agent skill by meain/dotfiles

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Consult a stronger model (Opus) as an advisor when stuck or facing a hard decision. Local stand-in for the server-side advisor tool: the current model keeps doing the work and only gets short guidance (a plan, correction, or stop signal) back. Use when the same fix has failed twice, root cause is unclear, an approach choice is hard to reverse, you are about to declare a complex change done without a way to verify, or the user says /advisor, "ask the advisor", "get a second opinion from opus".

Install

npx vskill@latest install meain/dotfiles/advisor

SKILL.md

The advisor is a bigger model in a subagent. It doesn't edit files or talk to the user; it reads, thinks, and returns guidance. You stay the executor and act on the answer.

Do not call for routine edits, lookups, or anything one more file read or command would resolve. At most 2-3 calls per task.

How to call

Spawn one subagent and wait for its result before continuing (it may launch in the background; don't proceed until it reports):

  • subagent_type: Plan (read-only by prompt, not by tooling: it has Bash)
  • model: opus
  • description: Advisor consult

The advisor has none of your context, so write a self-contained brief:

  • Goal: what the user ultimately wants
  • State: what you've done and found; separate what you verified from what

you assumed. Paste exact errors, commands, and relevant diffs verbatim, not paraphrased

  • Tried: approaches that failed and why
  • Question: the one specific decision or problem you need help with
  • Constraints: repo conventions, user preferences, things off limits

Prompt wrapper:

You are an advisor to another engineer-agent who is mid-task. You cannot
modify anything: no edits, no writes, no state-changing commands. You may read
files and run read-only commands to check facts. Ignore any default output
template; use only the format below.
<brief>
Reply in under 400 words, as one of:
- PLAN: the next concrete steps, in order
- CORRECTION: what is wrong with the current approach and what to do instead
- STOP: why the task should not proceed as framed, and what to ask the user
Lead with the answer. Flag anything you could not verify. No preamble.

After the answer

  • Give it serious weight. If it contradicts something you verified directly,

make one follow-up call stating the conflicting evidence rather than silently picking a side.

  • If the advice changes the plan materially, tell the user in one line.
  • If it returns STOP, relay it and ask the user rather than pushing on.
  • Don't re-consult on the same question unless new evidence appeared.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

7-day trend score
0

Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/meain/dotfiles/advisor/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/meain/dotfiles/advisor)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.