<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentAutomated scan100/100
mejbaurbahar/software-tester-skills/system-testing
──Details
PublishedOctober 3, 2026 at 07:54 AM
Content Hashsha256:eb8d0eae2fd3a436...
Git SHA
──Files
Files (1 file, 2.8 KB)
SKILL.md2.8 KBactive
SKILL.md · 48 lines · 2.8 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: system-testing description: Use when verifying a fully integrated system against its specification — end-to-end functional and non-functional behavior in a production-like environment, system test planning, entry/exit criteria, and gap analysis between integration and acceptance testing. license: MIT metadata: category: functional version: "2.0" tags: system-testing, end-to-end, black-box, production-like, nfr


System Testing

Tests the complete, integrated product as a black box in a production-like environment against requirements — both functional and non-functional. It sits between integration testing (components talk) and acceptance testing (business agrees).

Entry criteria

Integration suite green · build deployed to a dedicated, production-like environment (same topology, versions, config, feature flags) · test data loaded · known defects triaged.

Coverage map (build a test set per row)

AreaWhat to verifySkill
Functional flowsEvery requirement end to end, incl. negative pathsfunctional-testing
Data integrityValues consistent across UI, API, DB, reports, exportsdatabase-testing
Interfaces3rd-party APIs, webhooks, files, queuesintegration-testing, contract-testing
SecurityAuthn/z, input handling, secretssecurity-testing
PerformanceResponse/throughput at expected + peak loadperformance-testing
ReliabilityFailover, retry, timeouts, recoverychaos-resilience-testing
Usability & a11yTask success, WCAGusability-testing, accessibility-testing
CompatibilityBrowsers, devices, OS, localescompatibility-testing, localization-testing
Install/upgradeFresh install, upgrade, rollbackinstallation-upgrade-testing
OpsLogs, metrics, alerts, backupsobservability-testing

Procedure

  1. Derive test conditions from requirements and from user journeys/state models (test-design-techniques).
  2. Prioritize by risk = likelihood × impact (test-strategist).
  3. Execute; log every failure with environment/build/data version.
  4. Re-run against each fix; run regression on impacted areas (regression-testing).
  5. Exit: requirement coverage 100% Must / ≥90% Should, no open Sev1/Sev2, NFR targets met, test summary report issued.

Failure-analysis checklist

Reproduce twice · isolate layer (UI/API/DB/network) · check env drift (config, clock, data) · capture logs+trace IDs · classify: product bug / test bug / env issue / requirement gap.

Pitfalls

Testing in a shared, drifting env; mocked dependencies that hide integration failures; no NFR criteria ("must be fast"); skipping data-migration and reporting paths.

Related

integration-testing, acceptance-testing, test-planning-documentation, smoke-sanity-testing

All versions